xford Law Prof alarmed at "police’s Mossad-style execution" of innocent ’suspect’
by : John Gardner
Tuesday July 26, 2005 - 19:03
John Gardner is the Professor of Jurisprudence at the University of Oxford, and occasional Visiting Professor at Yale Law School.
Police state: Like many of my fellow-Londoners I am less alarmed by suicide bombers than I am by the police’s Mossad-style execution of a ’suspect’ (who turned out to be a completely innocent passer-by) on Friday 22 July. This is not because we are at greater risk of death at the hands of the police than at the hands of the bombers. (Both risks are pretty tiny, but of the two the risk posed by the police is clearly smaller). Rather, it is because, all else being equal, it is worse to be killed by one’s friends than by one’s enemies, and worse to be killed by people in authority than by people not in authority.
Here are some other important things to remember in thinking about the police actions of 22 July:
(1) There is no general legal duty to assist the police or to obey police instructions. Rice v Connolly  2 QB 414.
(2) There are special police powers to arrest and search. But there is no special police licence to injure or kill. If they injure or kill, the police need to rely on the same law as the rest of us.
(3) The law allows those who use force in prevention of crime to use only necessary and proportionate force. Jack Straw and Sir Ian Blair say that officers are under great pressure. But this is no excuse. In law, as in morality, being under extra pressure gives us no extra latitude for error in judging how much force is proportionate or necessary. R v Clegg  1 A.C. 482.
(4) Arguably, the police should be held to higher standards of calm under pressure than the rest of us. Certainly not lower!
(5) The necessity and proportionality of the police use of force is to be judged on the facts as they believed them to be: R v Williams 78 Cr. App R 276. This does create latitude for factual error. In my view it creates too much latitude. The test should be reasonable belief. The police may be prejudiced like the rest of us, and may treat the fact that someone is dark-skinned as one reason to believe that he is a suicide bomber. But in court this reason should not count.
(6) It is no defence in law that the killing was authorised by a superior officer. A superior officer who authorises an unlawful killing is an accomplice. R v Clegg  1 A.C. 482.
(7) The fact that those involved were police officers is irrelevant to the question of whether to prosecute them. It is a basic requirement of the Rule of Law that, when suspected of crimes, officials are subject to the same policies and procedures as the rest of us.
(8) Some people say: Blame the terrorists, not the police. But blame is not a zero-sum game. The fact that one is responding to faulty actions doesn’t mean one is incapable of being at fault oneself. We may blame Tony Blair for helping to create the conditions in which bombing appeals to people, without subtracting any blame from the bombers. We may also blame the bombers for creating the conditions in which the police act under pressure, without subtracting blame from the police if they overreact. Everyone is responsible for their own faulty actions, never mind the contribution of others. This is the moral position as well as the position in criminal law.
Proposed new anti-terrorist offences: The one that has been variously labelled as ’condoning’ or ’glorifying’ or ’indirectly inciting’ terrorism gives cause for concern. It is already an offence to incite another person to commit an act of terrorism (Terrorism Act 2000 s59). In which respects, we may wonder, is the scope of this offence to be extended? The word ’indirect’ suggests that they mean to catch those who incite the s59 inciter. But under general doctrines of English criminal law it is already an offence to incite the s59 inciter. So one suspects some other extension of the existing offence is being cooked up. Is the plan to criminalise the mere defence or endorsement of a terrorist act? If so we are in for trouble. Terrorism in English law is defined to cover all modes of political violence, however trifling. Are academics and commentators no longer to be permitted to defend any political violence? Is Ted Honderich’s Violence for Equality, or Peter Singer’s Democracy and Disobedience, to be put on the banned books list? The only thing protecting these books at the moment is that, in the eyes of the law, an argued endorsement is not an incitement. The thought that the government may be thinking of changing this should send a shiver down the spine of anyone who still has a spine (damn few).
Lord Hoffman in A v Home Secretary  2 WLR 87: ’The real threat to the life of the nation ... comes not from terrorism but from laws like these.’ Quite right. Some extra risk of being blown up by fanatics on the way to work is one of the prices we pay for living in a free society. Let’s make sure we keep it that way.
Seattle Police Officers Begin New Anti-Terror Training
... by the same people who taught the London cops how to shoot an innocent Brazilian man 8 times while he was pinned to the ground.
Rests behind your border Erdogan !…
Tuesday 4 - 11:27by laurentgantner
Let’s raise our european OXI !
Monday 3 - 21:40by Blockupy International
UPDATE: Get somebody with a history, not an opportunist
Wednesday 29 - 06:38by Timbre Wolf
Between the democracy and the war, there is Recep Tayyip Erdogan…
Tuesday 28 - 20:58by laurentgantner
Luanda Poised to Take Its Place on the World Stage
Monday 27 - 22:51
Saturday 25 - 00:05by Timbre Wolf
Grexit, first Act
Friday 24 - 13:09by Raffaele Sciortino
Europe’s Impossible Dream
Tuesday 21 - 16:58by Paul Krugman
"The Streets Of Athens Will Fill With Tanks"
Tuesday 21 - 16:44by Tyler Durden
Judah Ben-Hur for US President 2016
Tuesday 21 - 15:37
Who is Flavio Becca? The bricklayer who is about to crash
Monday 20 - 15:04
SCOTT WALKER: SATAN’S CANDIDATE
Sunday 19 - 02:21by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
Greece, austerity and the questions to pose
Friday 17 - 22:34by InfoAut
Tomorrow (on Saturday) it will stay 48 hours in Alexeï Tsipras To create the BMG
Friday 17 - 17:03by laurentgantner
Meet Leonid Sedov, the young lawyer behind Ukraine’s corruption
Thursday 16 - 19:27by Oleg Karpov
Maka Angola and Rafael Marques should have nothing to hide from Angola’s NGO ref
Saturday 11 - 17:22by Celia Perron
Greece will enter maybe finally the European Union this weekend …
Friday 10 - 22:32by laurentgantner
Get to Know Mirco de Jesus Martins
Thursday 9 - 23:40by FergusTes
Oxi Means NO... or at least it should
Sunday 5 - 22:26by Daniel Patrick Welch
Sunday 5 - 13:06by Roberto Ferrario
The Greek Tragedy. The Antigones against Creon
Saturday 4 - 10:37by InformationGuerrilla
Friday 3 - 15:26by Government Snitch
Greece - The Time of Refusal
Thursday 2 - 17:05by InfoAut
Valle de San Quintín labourers: a reflection of shame and demands for justice
Monday 29 - 21:16by Guillermo Castillo Ramírez
Civil unrest in America is due
Saturday 27 - 16:31by Willam Morgan
The Doha Goals Forum against discriminations
Friday 26 - 23:29by Pierce Durdan
The Evolution of Revolution
Thursday 25 - 17:06by Timbre Wolf
Young Entrepreneurs Doing Sustainable Business in Angola
Tuesday 23 - 17:26by Enrique Ramires
Taxation Without Representation—Déjà vu
Sunday 7 - 18:15by William John Cox
The specter of 1968 in Baltimore
Sunday 7 - 12:18by YOUSUF AL-BULUSHI
Regional Elections in Italy mark a stop for Renzi’s neoliberal project
Sunday 7 - 11:05by InfoAut
. . . And this leads us to the corporation’s “Most Threatening Man.”
Sunday 7 - 03:10by Timbre Wolf
How Mirco de Jesus Martins Plans to Help Angola
Thursday 4 - 22:52by Fred Gatling
TSA can steal my frying pan but they can’t find your goddamn bomb.
Tuesday 2 - 09:32by Timbre Wolf
Solidarity w/ Goldsmiths Students’ Union Officer Facing Persecution
Sunday 31 - 19:00by I.W.W. - Departments and Unions
Why Are Exchange-Traded Funds Preparing For A ‘Liquidity Crisis’ ....
Friday 15 - 16:25by Michael Snyder
Multiple and inter-dependent struggles for a Europe of communards
Thursday 7 - 14:58by Common Political Space (Italian social centers)
The Power and Symbolism of Voting
Thursday 7 - 13:30by William John Cox
Not everyone likes Expo
Monday 4 - 11:13by InfoAut
A Terrible Beauty
Thursday 30 - 23:34by Daniel Patrick Welch