Home > Can You Say Hidden Agenda?

Can You Say Hidden Agenda?

by Open-Publishing - Tuesday 8 August 2006
1 comment

School-University Religions-Beliefs Sciences Governments USA

The Discovery Institute’s True Raison d’être and Why We Need to Be Deeply
Concerned

by Jason Miller

"In 1998, members of a Seattle nonprofit think tank drafted a secret
five-year plan with an ambitious goal: to "defeat scientific materialism"
and "replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding
that nature and human beings are created by God."

Discovery Institute, a Seattle-based think tank which champions socially
conservative causes, has become heavily invested in the "debate" between
Darwinists and those who wish to introduce Intelligent Design into public
school classrooms.

According to their Website, Discovery’s stated mission is:

... to make a positive vision of the future practical. The Institute
discovers and promotes ideas in the common sense tradition of
representative government, the free market and individual liberty.

Finding a handful of academics willing to act as its shills, Discovery’s
ultimate goal is to subvert the prevailing paradigm of modern science
(which they refer to as "materialism") and replace it "with a science
consonant with Christian and theistic convictions".

In an internal document called the Wedge (click the link or continue
reading this piece to view the Wedge Strategy in its entirety) which was
uncovered in 1999, Discovery was highly specific in stating its goals and
plans to accomplish them. The institute clearly indicates that Intelligent
Design will be their principal weapon and Evolution their primary target
in its onslaught against "materialism".

Yet Discovery has higher aspirations than simply "debunking" Evolution and
bringing God back into the public schools.

Consider this excerpt from Nina Shapiro’s The New Creationists:

(Note: When Nina mentions Chapman, she is referring to Bruce Chapman, the
co-founder of Discovery Institute and a participant in the Reagan Regime
that ushered in the Neocon movement and the Second Gilded Age)

"Yet the Discovery Institute as an organization didn’t get involved in the
issue in order to solve the mysteries of the universe. Chapman is up front
about having a social and political agenda. He sees design intelligence as
a way to combat the growing reliance on genetic explanations for human
behavior and what he sees as an undermining of personal responsibility. As
an example of this phenomenon, Chapman cites the infamous "Twinkie
defense" used by a murder defendant claiming his sugar high made him do
it.

Others associated with the institute take a bigger leap of logic to argue
that welfare, as currently dispensed, is a misguided consequence of the
Darwinian outlook. "If you see human beings as nothing but matter and
motion, than all you do is treat them like mouths to feed," says Jay
Richards, program director for the institute’s Center for Science and
Culture. "If they’re more than that, you treat the whole person," he
argues, which would mean looking at such things as family structure and
the role of moral and religious values in their lives.

Do you really have to attack a whole branch of science in order to counter
liberal views on welfare? The Discovery Institute folk think they do.
"Unless you get the science right," Chapman says, "it’s very hard to
contend with the other arguments."

Ironically, Discovery is not even welcome in its "home town" of
Seattle.Consider Dan Gonsiorowski’s characterization on his Website,
Seattlest:

"Something’s gotta be done. We can’t throw them out. We’re looking into
it, but it appears you can’t excommunicate a think tank from the city. Our
usual weapon of choice, shame, won’t work on the minds behind Intelligent
Design because you can’t shame the shameless (see the State of the Union,
see also Fox News, see also the rest of the country, see also everyone but
Seattlest). Simply asking them to reconsider would be like trying to
reason with a monkey’s eyeball. Marching around their compound with big
Darwin posters on sticks and shouting stuff would be cathartic, but
probably have little result other than getting them more air time on Fox,
again with the Fox banner "Seattle-based think tank." Sometimes it’s even
"The Seattle-based think tank," like they’re the only ones thinking up in
here. There are plenty of other Seattle think tanks with more intelligent
design in their little pinky ring than the Discovery Institute has in its
whole body. There’s... Well, there probably is. Maybe that’s our solution.
We need some other thinkers to elevate the thinking. Tank up and start
thinking, Seattle, for the sake of our national image. Think so far
outside the box that you wouldn’t even consider saying something as lame
as "think outside the box" and steer clear of any thinking that leads you
to believe that there’s scientific evidence for Intelligent Design.

In 1998, members of a Seattle nonprofit think tank drafted a secret
five-year plan with an ambitious goal: to "defeat scientific materialism"
and "replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding
that nature and human beings are created by God."

For a glimpse into the "soul" of the Discovery Institute, here is its
Wedge Strategy:

http://www.antievolution.org/features/wedge.html

As you peruse the Wedge, bear in mind that the Center for Renewal of
Science and Culture is a part of the Discovery Institute, Intelligent
Design truly is a theory despite the fact that it is merely an assertion
with no supporting evidence, and that Discovery has no religious agenda
whatsoever.

NOTE FROM LENNY FLANK, author of Creation "Science" Debunked: The Wedge
Document is an internal memorandum from the Discovery Institute (the
leading proponent of Intelligent Designer "Theory") that was leaked to the
Internet in 1999. The Discovery Institute later admitted to its
authenticity. Since then, Discovery Institute hasn’t talked very much
about the document, or the strategy it outlines. The reason is crushingly
obvious, since the Wedge Document makes it readily apparent that the
Discovery Institute is flat-out lying to us when it claims that its
Intelligent Designer campaign is concerned only with science and does not
have any religious aims, purpose or effect.

THE WEDGE STRATEGY

CENTER FOR THE RENEWAL OF SCIENCE & CULTURE

INTRODUCTION

The proposition that human beings are created in the image of God is one
of the bedrock principles on which Western civilization was built. Its
influence can be detected in most, if not all, of the West’s greatest
achievements, including representative democracy, human rights, free
enterprise, and progress in the arts and sciences.

Yet a little over a century ago, this cardinal idea came under wholesale
attack by intellectuals drawing on the discoveries of modern science.
Debunking the traditional conceptions of both God and man, thinkers such
as Charles Darwin, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud portrayed humans not as
moral and spiritual beings, but as animals or machines who inhabited a
universe ruled by purely impersonal forces and whose behavior and very
thoughts were dictated by the unbending forces of biology, chemistry, and
environment. This materialistic conception of reality eventually infected
virtually every area of our culture, from politics and economics to
literature and art.

The cultural consequences of this triumph of materialism were devastating.
Materialists denied the existence of objective moral standards, claiming
that environment dictates our behavior and beliefs. Such moral relativism
was uncritically adopted by much of the social sciences, and it still
undergirds much of modern economics, political science, psychology and
sociology.

Materialists also undermined personal responsibility by asserting that
human thoughts and behaviors are dictated by our biology and environment.
The results can be seen in modern approaches to criminal justice, product
liability, and welfare. In the materialist scheme of things, everyone is a
victim and no one can be held accountable for his or her actions.

Finally, materialism spawned a virulent strain of utopianism. Thinking
they could engineer the perfect society through the application of
scientific knowledge, materialist reformers advocated coercive government
programs that falsely promised to create heaven on earth.

Discovery Institute’s Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture seeks
nothing less than the overthrow of materialism and its cultural legacies.
Bringing together leading scholars from the natural sciences and those
from the humanities and social sciences, the Center explores how new
developments in biology, physics and cognitive science raise serious
doubts about scientific materialism and have re-opened the case for a
broadly theistic understanding of nature. The Center awards fellowships
for original research, holds conferences, and briefs policymakers about
the opportunities for life after materialism.

The Center is directed by Discovery Senior Fellow Dr. Stephen Meyer. An
Associate Professor of Philosophy at Whitworth College, Dr. Meyer holds a
Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from Cambridge University.
He formerly worked as a geophysicist for the Atlantic Richfield Company.

THE WEDGE STRATEGY

Phase I.
Scientific Research, Writing & PublicityPhase

II.Publicity & Opinion-making

Phase III.Cultural Confrontation & Renewal

THE WEDGE PROJECTS

Phase I. Scientific Research, Writing & PublicationIndividual Research
Fellowship ProgramPaleontology Research program (Dr. Paul Chien et
al.)Molecular Biology Research Program (Dr. Douglas Axe et al.)

Phase II. Publicity & Opinion-makingBook PublicityOpinion-Maker
ConferencesApologetics SeminarsTeacher Training ProgramOp-ed FellowPBS (or
other TV) Co-productionPublicity Materials / Publications

Phase III. Cultural Confrontation & RenewalAcademic and Scientific
Challenge ConferencesPotential Legal Action for Teacher TrainingResearch
Fellowship Program: shift to social sciences and humanities

FIVE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN SUMMARY

The social consequences of materialism have been devastating. As symptoms,
those consequences are certainly worth treating. However, we are convinced
that in order to defeat materialism, we must cut it off at its source.
That source is scientific materialism. This is precisely our strategy. If
we view the predominant materialistic science as a giant tree, our
strategy is intended to function as a "wedge" that, while relatively
small, can split the trunk when applied at its weakest points. The very
beginning of this strategy, the "thin edge of the wedge," was Phillip
]ohnson’s critique of Darwinism begun in 1991 in Darwinism on Trial, and
continued in Reason in the Balance and Defeatng Darwinism by Opening
Minds. Michael Behe’s highly successful Darwin’s Black Box followed
Johnson’s work. We are building on this momentum, broadening the wedge
with a positive scientific alternative to materialistic scientific
theories, which has come to be called the theory of intelligent design
(ID). Design theory promises to reverse the stifling dominance of the
materialist worldview, and to replace it with a science consonant with
Christian and theistic convictions.

The Wedge strategy can be divided into three distinct but interdependent
phases, which are roughly but not strictly chronological. We believe that,
with adequate support, we can accomplish many of the objectives of Phases
I and II in the next five years (1999-2003), and begin Phase III (See
"Goals/ Five Year Objectives/Activities").

Phase I: Research, Writing and Publication

Phase II: Publicity and Opinion-making

Phase III: Cultural Confrontation and Renewal

Phase I is the essential component of everything that comes afterward.
Without solid scholarship, research and argument, the project would be
just another attempt to indoctrinate instead of persuade. A lesson we have
learned from the history of science is that it is unnecessary to outnumber
the opposing establishment. Scientific revolutions are usually staged by
an initially small and relatively young group of scientists who are not
blinded by the prevailing prejudices and who are able to do creative work
at the pressure points, that is, on those critical issues upon which whole
systems of thought hinge. So, in Phase I we are supporting vital witting
and research at the sites most likely to crack the materialist edifice.

Phase II. The primary purpose of Phase II is to prepare the popular
reception of our ideas. The best and truest research can languish unread
and unused unless it is properly publicized. For this reason we seek to
cultivate and convince influential individuals in print and broadcast
media, as well as think tank leaders, scientists and academics,
congressional staff, talk show hosts, college and seminary presidents and
faculty, future talent and potential academic allies. Because of his long
tenure in politics, journalism and public policy, Discovery President
Bruce Chapman brings to the project rare knowledge and acquaintance of key
op-ed writers, journalists, and political leaders. This combination of
scientific and scholarly expertise and media and political connections
makes the Wedge unique, and also prevents it from being "merely academic."
Other activities include production of a PBS documentary on intelligent
design and its implications, and popular op-ed publishing. Alongside a
focus on influential opinion-makers, we also seek to build up a popular
base of support among our natural constituency, namely, Christians. We
will do this primarily through apologetics seminars. We intend these to
encourage and equip believers with new scientific evidence’s that support
the faith, as well as to "popularize" our ideas in the broader culture.

Phase III. Once our research and writing have had time to mature, and the
public prepared for the reception of design theory, we will move toward
direct confrontation with the advocates of materialist science through
challenge conferences in significant academic settings. We will also
pursue possible legal assistance in response to resistance to the
integration of design theory into public school science curricula. The
attention, publicity, and influence of design theory should draw
scientific materialists into open debate with design theorists, and we
will be ready. With an added emphasis to the social sciences and
humanities, we will begin to address the specific social consequences of
materialism and the Darwinist theory that supports it in the sciences.

GOALS

Governing Goals

To defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral, cultural and
political legacies.

To replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that
nature and human beings are created by God.

Five Year Goals

To see intelligent design theory as an accepted alternative in the
sciences and scientific research being done from the perspective of design
theory.

To see the beginning of the influence of design theory in spheres other
than natural science.

To see major new debates in education, life issues, legal and personal
responsibility pushed to the front of the national agenda.

Twenty Year Goals

To see intelligent design theory as the dominant perspective in science.

To see design theory application in specific fields, including molecular
biology, biochemistry, paleontology, physics and cosmology in the natural
sciences, psychology, ethics, politics, theology and philosophy in the
humanities; to see its influence in the fine arts.

To see design theory permeate our religious, cultural, moral and political
life.

FIVE YEAR OBJECTIVES

1. A major public debate between design theorists and Darwinists (by 2003)

2. Thirty published books on design and its cultural implications (sex,
gender issues, medicine, law, and religion)

3. One hundred scientific, academic and technical articles by our fellows

4. Significant coverage in national media:

Cover story on major news magazine such as Time or NewsweekPBS show such
as Nova treating design theory fairlyRegular press coverage on
developments in design theoryFavorable op-ed pieces and columns on the
design movement by 3rd party media

5. Spiritual & cultural renewal:

Mainline renewal movements begin to appropriate insights from design
theory, and to repudiate theologies influenced by materialism

Major Christian denomination(s) defend(s) traditional doctrine of creation
& repudiate(s)Darwinism Seminaries increasingly recognize & repudiate
naturalistic presuppositionsPositive uptake in public opinion polls on
issues such as sexuality, abortion and belief in God

6. Ten states begin to rectify ideological imbalance in their science
curricula & include design theory

7. Scientific achievements:

An active design movement in Israel, the UK and other influential
countries outside the US

Ten CRSC Fellows teaching at major universities

Two universities where design theory has become the dominant view

Design becomes a key concept in the social sciences Legal reform movements
base legislative proposals on design theory

ACTVITIES

(1) Research Fellowship Program (for writing and publishing)

(2) Front line research funding at the "pressure points" (e.g., Daul
Chien’s Chengjiang Cambrian Fossil Find in paleontology, and Doug Axe’s
research laboratory in molecular biology)

(3) Teacher training

(4) Academic Conferences

(5) Opinion-maker Events & Conferences

(6) Alliance-building, recruitment of future scientists and leaders, and
strategic partnerships with think tanks, social advocacy groups,
educational organizations and institutions, churches, religious groups,
foundations and media outlets

(7) Apologetics seminars and public speaking

(8) Op-ed and popular writing

(9) Documentaries and other media productions

(10) Academic debates

(11) Fund Raising and Development

(12) General Administrative support

THE WEDGE STRATEGY PROGRESS SUMMARY

Books

William Dembski and Paul Nelson, two CRSC Fellows, will very soon have
books published by major secular university publishers, Cambridge
University Press and The University of Chicago Press, respectively. (One
critiques Darwinian materialism; the other offers a powerful alternative.)

Nelson’s book, On Common Descent, is the seventeenth book in the
prestigious University of Chicago "Evolutionary Monographs" series and the
first to critique neo-Darwinism. Dembski’s book, The Design Inference, was
back-ordered in June, two months prior to its release date.

These books follow hard on the heals of Michael Behe’s Darwin’s Black Box
(The Free Press) which is now in paperback after nine print runs in hard
cover. So far it has been translated into six foreign languages. The
success of his book has led to other secular publishers such as McGraw
Hill requesting future titles from us. This is a breakthrough.

InterVarsity will publish our large anthology, Mere Creation (based upon
the Mere Creation conference) this fall, and Zondervan is publishing Maker
of Heaven and Earth: Three Views of the Creation-Evolution Controversy,
edited by fellows John Mark Reynolds and J.P. Moreland.

McGraw Hill solicited an expedited proposal from Meyer, Dembski and Nelson
on their book Uncommon Descent. Finally, Discovery Fellow Ed Larson has
won the Pulitzer Prize for Summer for the Gods, his retelling of the
Scopes Trial, and InterVarsity has just published his co-authored attack
on assisted suicide, A Different Death.

Academic Articles

Our fellows recently have been featured or published articles in major
scientific and academic journals in The Proceedings to the National
Academy of Sciences, Nature, The Scientist, The American Biology Teacher,
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Biochemistry,
Philosophy and Biology, Faith & Philosophy, American Philosophical
Quarterly, Rhetoric & Public Affairs, Analysis, Book & Culture, Ethics &
Medicine, Zygon, Perspectives on Science and the Christian Faith,
Religious Studies, Christian Scholars’ Review, The Southern Journal of
Philosophy, and the Journal of Psychology and Theology. Many more such
articles are now in press or awaiting review at major secular journals as
a result of our first round of research fellowships. Our own journal,
Origins & Design, continues to feature scholarly contributions from CRSC
Fellows and other scientists.

Television and Radio Appearances

During 1997 our fellows appeared on numerous radio programs (both
Christian and secular) and five nationally televised programs, Techno
Politics, Hardball with Chris Matthews, Inside the Law, Freedom Speaks,
and Firing Line. The special edition of Techno Politics that we produced
with PBS in November elicited such an unprecedented audience response that
the producer Neil Freeman decided to air a second episode from the "out
takes." His enthusiasm for our intellectual agenda helped stimulate a
special edition of William F. Buckley’s Firing Line, featuring Phillip
Johnson and two of our fellows, Michael Behe and David Berlinski. At Ed
Atsinger’s invitation, Phil Johnson and Steve Meyer addressed Salem
Communications’ Talk Show Host conference in Dallas last November. As a
result, Phil and Steve have been interviewed several times on Salem talk
shows across the country. For example, in July Steve Meyer and Mike Behe
were interviewed for two hours on the nationally broadcast radio show
Janet Parshall’s America. Canadian Public Radio (CBC) recently featured
Steve Meyer on their Tapestry program. The episode, "God & the
Scientists," has aired all across Canada. And in April, William Craig
debated Oxford atheist Peter Atkins in Atlanta before a large audience
(moderated by William F. Buckley), which was broadcast live via satellite
link, local radio, and internet "webcast."

Newspaper and Magazine Articles

The Firing Line debate generated positive press coverage for our movement
in, of all places, The New York Times, as well as a column by Bill
Buckley. In addition, our fellows have published recent articles & op-eds
in both the secular and Christian press, including, for example, The Wall
Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Times, National Review,
Commentary, Touchstone, The Detroit News, The Boston Review, The Seattle
Post-lntelligence, Christianity Today, Cosmic Pursuits and World. An op-ed
piece by Jonathan Wells and Steve Meyer is awaiting publication in the
Washington Post. Their article criticizes the National Academy of Science
book Teaching about Evolution for its selective and ideological
presentation of scientific evidence. Similar articles are in the works.

Well-connected, well-funded, and frighteningly determined to impose their
beliefs on society as a whole, it is little wonder that the Discovery
Institute and Fundamentalist Christians are proving to be a match made in
their Christian God’s heaven as they wage their intellectual war against
the "evils" of "materialism".

Proponents of Intelligent Design often charge those of us who support
Evolution as being dogmatic. Yet as a critical thinking person who is
almost constantly seeking to expand my knowledge base, I find myself
consistently examining and shaping my worldview and beliefs. I recognize
that there are limitations to the Theory of Evolution, and I see no
problem with teaching our children that Evolution is a theory rather than
dogmatic fact. And if valid scientific theories arise to rival Evolution,
by all means, our children need to learn them too.

However, I strenuously object to intellectually dishonest groups of people
employing Intelligent Design as their Trojan Horse to put their God back
into public schools.

Evolution is the "wedge". Theocracy is the goal.

Freedom of conscience is one of humanity’s most precious liberties. Which
is precisely why many of the founders of the United States found
themselves fleeing to the "New World".

Is it such a surprise that those of us opposing the agenda of the likes of
Discovery "dogmatically" assert for our freedoms to think critically and
define our own spirituality?

Jason Miller is a 39 year old sociopolitical essayist with a degree in
liberal arts and an extensive self-education (derived from an insatiable
appetite for reading). He is a member of Amnesty International and an avid
supporter of Oxfam International and Human Rights Watch. He welcomes
responses at willpowerful@hotmail.com or comments on his blog, Thomas
Paine’s Corner, at http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/.

Forum posts

  • While Hidden Hand Puppets like Bill O’Reilly distract sovereigns with disinfo such as "there’s a war on christmas" behind the scenes christians have been launching a war on science.