Le site Bellaciao: coloré, multiple, ou le meilleur cotoie fort heureusement le pire, mélangé, bizarre, picabien et dadaîste, explorant toutes sortes de registres et de régimes rhétoriques, drole et polémiqueur, surréaliste: rencontre d'un parapluie et d'une machine à coudre sur une table de dissection, têtes de Lénine sur le clavier d'un piano Steinway ou Bosendorfer...
FR
ES
Senal en Vivo
VIDEO
RADIO
FRIENDS SITES
with Bellaciao
Bellaciao hosted by
To rebel is right, to disobey is a duty, to act is necessary !
Bellaciao  mobile version   |   Home  |   About us   |   Donation  |   Links  |   Contact  |   Search
Why is the left so gauche?

by : Patrice de Beer
Monday March 5, 2007 - 18:55

The French presidential campaign is a clear example of how difficult it can be for the left, in a democratic country, to achieve power. It raises a perennial question: why is the left always so disorganised, divided by internecine and self-destructive squabbles in countries where the political spectrum is, roughly, equally divided?

In France in particular - which since 1978 has voted every government (left or right) out of office after one term - why does the outgoing interior minister and head of the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP) ruling party, Nicolas Sarkozy, still look the most likely candidate to win in the decisive second round on 6 May 2007? Is it because "Sarko" has banished the old curse that the French right wing is "the stupidest in the world" - or because the French left, in its inability to get rid of worn-out politicians, ideologies, methods and political rivalries, has acquired this unwelcome prize?

The left’s responsibility, according to this explanation, is that it has failed to understand that in today’s political world there is no more place for messy amateurism, for militants whose party loyalty is in itself not enough to plan a good campaign, organise efficient meetings or visits for their candidate, or answer tit-for-tat attacks by an opponent whose own campaign team is tightly-knit, geared towards success and led by professionals? No surprise that, in French, the word gauche can mean "left" as well as "clumsy".

It is true that, after the disaster of the 2002 campaign of Parti Socialiste (PS) candidate Lionel Jospin (which should be studied by strategists as a good example of what not to do if you want to win an election), the French left seems today as prone to shoot itself in the foot again. In 2002, the left represented 45% of the votes but was split into ten candidates; so Jospin only got 16%.

This time, Ségolène Royal says she has learnt her lesson and is fighting on a very different platform and in a fresher style, with a feminist touch unheard of in this male-chauvinist political world. But she is also plagued on her left by at least seven potential spoiler candidates: three Trotskyites, one communist, one altermondialiste and two greens: divided among themselves, their only power in the next elections could well be to make a nuisance (see "French politics: where extremes meet", 4 December 2006).

Worse, "Ségo" has touched a raw nerve within her own PS by stealing power from the party stalwarts (or "elephants"); just as François Mitterrand did in the 1970s. True, the main "elephants" (former presidential aspirants Laurent Fabius and Dominique Strauss-Kahn as well as Jospin himself) are now - at least officially - part of Ségo’s team, and the party is at pains to close ranks against a formidably united right.

But the clouds have not dispelled. The PS’s economic expert, Eric Besson has resigned from Ségo’s campaign and left the party, accusing Royal of being an "amateur" and of shunning the "elephants". And two socialist think-tanks - one of top civil servants (Spartacus) and the other regrouping ethnic minorities (Prairial 21) - have broken ranks. Even worse, it looks obvious that Ségo’s - so far - messy campaign has also been the victim of back-stabbing from within the PS, where some seem to prefer Sarkozy - or centrist candidate François Bayrou - to their party’s own, democratically chosen candidate.

Loopy left and ruthless right

Why is it that the prime enemy of leftist militants is so often their closest ally within their own party or political family, rather than their adversary on the opposite, rightwing side?

Will the far left ever learn its lesson? Or will the attraction of splinter, extremist groups making wild promises and advocating ideological paradises (which are, as everyone knows, not of this world) prevail? Will the left continue to prefer the safe comfort of opposition - i.e. the victory of the right they pretend so much to hate - to taking and sharing responsibility?

The paradox is that, even when leftwing parties are attracted by extremism and self-defeatism, their saviours are usually moderates. Here are four examples.

First, Francois Mitterrand led the French left to power twice (in 1981 and 1988). He had started his career on the right of the political spectrum - unlike Jospin who, like many other comrades, entered politics via Trotskyism. Yet Mitterrand was able to put together a formidable war machine and coerce his party’s many cliques (as well as other leftist parties) to work, win and govern together - whereas Jospin, who tried to succeed him as president in 1995 and 2002, each time failed to unite his brother enemies.

Second, Gerhard Schröder lost power in Germany in 2005 to the CDU’s Angela Merkel thanks to a leftwing split from the SDP under Oskar Lafontaine, whose Die Wahlalternative (WASG) group objected to the chancellor’s "liberal" policies. Today, its Linkspartei alliance with the reformed communists of East Germany (pending a formal merger in June 2007) is represented in the Bundestag, but the policy of Merkel’s government is even more "liberal". So what?

Third, Britain’s Labour Party was plagued by splits from right and left in the 1980s - the Social Democratic Party breakaway and the Trotskyist "entryism" of the Militant Tendency - was ousted from power for two decades by Margaret Thatcher before returning to victory in 1997 under a rightwing, control-freak, authoritarian leader with a iron grip on the party; Tony Blair, thanks to a divided Conservative Party, has since been twice re-elected. In the United States, the only Democrat who was able to wrest power from the Republicans in a quarter of a century was the moderate, "third-way" Bill Clinton; and he owed his success to the fact that the right in 1992 presented two candidates, the independent populist Ross Perot as well as the Republican incumbent, George HW Bush.

Fourth, the centrist Romano Prodi remains the only politician in Italy able to unite the left, and part of the centre, against Silvio Berlusconi. Yet his coalition patchwork is always on the verge of splitting - as happened in 1998, and again in February 2007, in each case at the risk of paving the way for the return of Il Cavaliere. This master of political cocktails - a taste of moderate liqueur, another of leftist hard spirits with a touch of Machiavellian flair - remains the Italian left’s best chance to counter a ruthless right; yet the latter is often less dangerous for his coalition than betrayal from his own ranks, usually from unreconstructed communists.

Are there lessons in all this: that elections are more often lost than won; that their winners often benefit more from their adversaries’ divisions and mistakes than their own strengths; and that winners must beware their friends as much as their enemies? Just look at the 2000 American elections: would George W Bush been elected to lead the United States and the world to the disaster in the middle east, had Al Gore conducted a better campaign and Green candidate Ralph Nader - both convinced environmentalists - not split the democratic vote?

In France, there is a name for this kind of hard green: Khmer Vert, an echo of the Khmer Rouge tag given to the Cambodian extremists under Pol Pot. Yet if democracy is "one person, one vote", its success depends also on the number of boxes where votes can be cast. If, in bipartisan political systems, two is enough and three can be a crowd, what do the forty candidates struggling to join the first round of the French presidential elections on 22 April - of which a dozen at most will be able to stand - say about the quality of French democracy?

 http://www.opendemocracy.net/global...



Leave a comment
Print this article





Public Apology to Women of the World from The American Republic (Hypatia of Alex
Monday 31 - 15:21
by Willam Morgan
YES, THERE WILL BE ELECTION FRAUD, AND ON A GRAND SCALE
Sunday 23 - 18:32
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Hillary Clinton will be first female President 2017
Monday 10 - 17:21
by Willam Morgan
Police Shootings: Law, Policy, and Accountability
Thursday 6 - 14:22
by William John Cox
AMERICA DESERVES BETTER, BUT EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE WORLD DESERVES BETTER
Thursday 29 - 18:02
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Back to School for Fascist Dupont-Aignan
Thursday 15 - 11:32
by Nouveau Comité de Vigilance des Intellectuels Antifascistes
The Presidency: Character Matters
Friday 9 - 15:06
by William John Cox
WHY HILLARY IS THE PERFECT PERSON TO SECURE OBAMA’S LEGACY
Tuesday 30 - 18:08
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Remake of Ben Hur in 2020 planned by new motion picture studio
Friday 26 - 15:50
by Wallace
THE CASE FOR DONALD TRUMP
Monday 22 - 19:32
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES IS DEAD
Thursday 11 - 06:42
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
DONALD TRUMP AND THE GENIUS OF IDIOCY
Friday 5 - 00:47
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
FOOLING MOST OF THE PEOPLE MOST OF THE TIME IS WHAT AMERICAN POLITICS ARE ABOUT,
Friday 29 - 18:13
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
A message of your fellow striking workers from France
Tuesday 12 - 20:49
by Info’Com-CGT
The Right to Vote, Effectively
Friday 8 - 22:20
by William John Cox
Fourth of July Lies
Sunday 3 - 19:41
by June C. Terpstra
Who Should Make Political Policy, the People or the Politicians?
Friday 24 - 15:14
by William John Cox
Hollow Women of the Hegemon Part II: Atrocity Enabling Harpies
Tuesday 21 - 18:49
by Dr. June Terpstra
The American Republic Manifestum book is being made into a Movie
Saturday 11 - 15:54
by William Morgan
Write-in Voting and Political Protest
Wednesday 1 - 15:05
by William John Cox
Yves Bouvier art battle plays out in online and social media arena
Tuesday 31 - 21:12
by Dean Bagley
Damaged Candidate Clinton Can’t Call Out Trump
Friday 27 - 13:53
by Daniel Patrick Welch
PLEDGE OF THE NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY
Tuesday 24 - 21:53
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
LET TEXAS SECEDE
Thursday 19 - 00:53
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
LAS TRES ERRES A LA ENÉSIMA POTENCIA.-
Monday 16 - 15:35
by FREDDY SUBDIAGA
DEMAGOGIA POPULISTA...
Monday 16 - 15:26
by FREDDY SUBDIAGA
Oligarchs Won’t Let You Vote Their Wars Away
Wednesday 11 - 20:24
by Daniel Patrick Welch
AN AMERICAN ORIGINAL: JOHN KERRY - FROM HIS REMARKABLE RECENT COMMENCEMENT ADDR
Monday 9 - 20:40
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton support the American Republic Manifestum
Monday 9 - 16:37
by William Morgan
Transformation: A Student-Led Mass Political Movement
Monday 25 - 19:28
by William John Cox
Algerian Feminists react to ’Hijab Day’ in Paris 2016
Monday 25 - 01:13
THE ILLUSION OF RIGHTS
Friday 22 - 18:45
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
US is real superpredator pretending to be victim
Monday 18 - 22:23
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Gaiacomm International has accidently created a fusion reaction/ignition.
Sunday 17 - 17:01
by William Morgan
Clinton’s Campaign Continues to Highlight Horrible Hillary
Saturday 9 - 00:57
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Armoiries racistes à Harvard : Plaidoyer pour la réflexion socio-historique
Thursday 7 - 18:56
by Samuel Beaudoin Guzzo
THANK YOU MISSISSIPPI FOR YOUR HATE
Wednesday 6 - 02:02
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
The PKK in Iraq: “We are ready to fight ISIS everywhere in the world”
Monday 4 - 14:33
by InfoAut
Clinton Crashes and Burns, Sanders Will Win (But hold off on the applause)
Friday 1 - 22:33
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Confirming Supreme Court Justices and Electing Presidents
Friday 1 - 20:59
by William John Cox

home | webmaster



Follow-up of the site's activity
RSS Bellaciao En


rss FR / rss IT / rss ES



Bellaciao hosted by DRI

It is the responsibility of the intellectual to speak the truth and to expose lies. Noam Chomsky
Facebook Twitter Google+
DAZIBAO
I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name
Thursday 10 March
©Olivier Jobard/Myop I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM IS A RIGHT In the phrase « right to asylum », every word matters. Under the law, every person who is persecuted because of his or her political opinions or because of his or her identity, every person that is endangered by violence, war or misery has a RIGHT to seek asylum in another country The aim of this petition is to collect (...)
read more...
Neo-Nazis and far-right protesters in Ukraine 3 live-stream
Friday 24 January
2 comments
The far-right in Ukraine are acting as the vanguard of a protest movement that is being reported as pro-democracy. The situation on the ground is not as simple as pro-EU and trade versus pro-Putin and Russian hegemony in the region. When US Senator John McCain dined with Ukraine’s opposition leaders in December, he shared a table and later a stage with the leader of the extreme far-right Svoboda party Oleh Tyahnybok. This is Oleh Tyahnybok, he has claimed a "Moscow-Jewish mafia" (...)
read more...
Hugo Chavez is dead (video live)
Wednesday 6 March
by : Collective BELLACIAO
1 comment
President Hugo Chavez companeros venezueliano died after a long battle with cancer.
read more...
International initiative to stop the war in Syria Yes to democracy, no to foreign intervention!
Thursday 13 December
Your support here: http://www.peaceinsyria.org/support.php We, the undersigned, who are part of an international civil society increasingly worried about the awful bloodshed of the Syrian people, are supporting a political initiative based on the results of a fact-finding mission which some of our colleagues undertook to Beirut and Damascus in September 2012. This initiative consists in calling for a delegation of highranking personalities and public figures to go to Syria in order to (...)
read more...
THE KU KLUX KLAN ONCE AGAIN CONTROLS INDIANA
Monday 12 November
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
7 comments
At first glance, the results of America’s 2012 election appear to be a triumph for social, racial, and economic justice and progress in the United States: California voters passed a proposition requiring the rich to shoulder their fair share of the tax burden; Two states, Colorado and Washington, legalized the recreational use of marijuana, while Massachusetts approved the use of marijuana for medical purposes; Washington and two other states, Maine and Maryland, legalized same-sex (...)
read more...
I’VE DECIDED TO "WASTE" MY VOTE
Sunday 28 October
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
In a 2004 episode of Comedy Central’s animated series South Park, an election was held to determine whether the new mascot for the town’s elementary school would be a “giant douche” or a “turd sandwich.” Confronted with these two equally unpalatable choices, one child, Stan Marsh, refused to vote at all, which resulted in his ostracization and subsequent banishment from the town. Although this satirical vulgarity was intended as a commentary on the two (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART IV
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART III If there is one major inconsistency in life, it is that young people who know little more than family, friends and school are suddenly, at the age of eighteen, supposed to decide what they want to do for the rest of their lives. Unfortunately, because of their limited life experiences, the illusions they have about certain occupations do not always comport to the realities. I discovered this the first time I went to college. About a year into my studies, I (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART III
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART IV Disillusioned with the machinations of so-called “traditional” colleges, I became an adjunct instructor at several “for-profit” colleges. Thanks largely to the power and pervasiveness of the Internet, “for-profit” colleges (hereinafter for-profits) have become a growing phenomenon in America. They have also been the subject of much political debate and the focus of a Frontline special entitled College Inc. Unlike traditional (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART II
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART III PART IV Several years ago, a young lady came into the college where I was teaching to inquire about a full-time instructor’s position in the sociology department. She was advised that only adjunct positions were available. Her response was, “No thanks. Once an adjunct, always an adjunct.” Her words still echo in my mind. Even as colleges and universities raise their tuition costs, they are relying more and more on adjunct instructors. Adjuncts are (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART I
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART II PART III PART IV When The Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution over two hundred years ago, Americans were blessed with many rights considered to be “fundamental.” One conspicuously missing, however, was the right to an education. This was not surprising given the tenor of the times. America was primarily an agrarian culture, and education, especially higher education, was viewed as a privilege reserved for the children of the rich and (...)
read more...
ONE SOLITARY LIFE, PART TWO
Monday 30 July
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
3 comments
If there is one universal question that haunts all human beings at some point in their lives, it is, “Why do we die?” Death, after all, is the great illogic. It ultimately claims all, the rich and the poor, the mighty and the small, the good and the evil. Death also has the capability to make most human pursuits—such as the quest for wealth, fame and power—vacuous and fleeting. Given this reality, I have often wondered why so many people are still willing to (...)
read more...
HOW MUCH CORRUPTION CAN DEMOCRACY ENDURE?
Thursday 28 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
6 comments
How much corruption can a “democracy” endure before it ceases to be a democracy? If five venal, mendacious, duplicitous, amoral, biased and (dare I say it) satanic Supreme Court “justices”—John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy—have their way, America will soon find out. In several previous articles for Pravda.Ru, I have consistently warned how the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision is one of the (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS, PART TWO
Tuesday 12 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
1 comment
Imagine, if you will, that the United States government passes a law banning advertisers from sponsoring commercials on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show or Rupert Murdoch’s Fox (Faux) “News” Network. On one hand, there would be two decided advantages to this ban: The National IQ would undoubtedly increase several percentage points, and manipulative pseudo-journalists would no longer be able to appeal to the basest instincts in human nature for ratings and profit while (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS
Thursday 7 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Pravda.Ru Legal Editor
4 comments
LIVE, from the State that brought you Senator Joseph McCarthy, Wisconsin voters now proudly present, fresh from his recall election victory, Governor Scott Walker! At first glance, it is almost unfathomable that anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have voted to retain Scott Walker as Wisconsin’s governor. This, after all, is a man who openly declared he is trying to destroy the rights of workers through a “divide and conquer” strategy; who received 61% of the (...)
read more...
PEOPLE WITHOUT SOULS
Tuesday 13 March
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
2 comments
A question I’ve frequently been asked since I began writing for Pravda.Ru in 2003 is, “Why did you become disillusioned with the practice of law?” This question is understandable, particularly since, in most people’s minds, being an attorney is synonymous with wealth and political power. I’ve always been reluctant to answer this question for fear it will discourage conscientious and ethical people from pursuing careers in the legal profession—a (...)
read more...