Le site Bellaciao: coloré, multiple, ou le meilleur cotoie fort heureusement le pire, mélangé, bizarre, picabien et dadaîste, explorant toutes sortes de registres et de régimes rhétoriques, drole et polémiqueur, surréaliste: rencontre d'un parapluie et d'une machine à coudre sur une table de dissection, têtes de Lénine sur le clavier d'un piano Steinway ou Bosendorfer...
FR
ES
Senal en Vivo
VIDEO
RADIO
FRIENDS SITES
with Bellaciao
Bellaciao hosted by
To rebel is right, to disobey is a duty, to act is necessary !
Bellaciao  mobile version   |   Home  |   About us   |   Donation  |   Links  |   Contact  |   Search
Philippe Marlière : "It would be suicidal for the Left to import Blairism in France"

by : Philippe Marlière
Friday July 13, 2007 - 15:32
JPEG - 11.1 kb

By Jacqueline Sellem

In 1998, Tony Blair declared before French deputies: “There is no right or left politics in economic management today, but economic policies which work and other which don’t work.” ... "It is amusing to hear some elements in the French media talking about a ’socially-sensitive Blair’ whereas he has actually re-used Thatcher’s neoliberal recipes and promoted the interests of the advocates of the financial capitalism."

HUMA: When French media summed up Blair’s legacy during the last few days, they talked about pragmatism, social Thatcherism, modernism, social-democracy… What do you think about it?

MARLIÈRE (1) : In 1998, Tony Blair declared before French deputies: “There is no right or left politics in economic management today, but economic policies which work and other which don’t work.” He introduced his so-called politic modernism and his willingness to break away from “Old Labour.” This strong emphasis on pragmatism gave way to more ideological choices. In fact, Blairism stayed on Thatcherism’s tracks while rectifying a few things for the poorest and single-parent families. He set a security net for these categories but did not reduce inequalities which, on the other hand, greatly increased. He did not break apart with Thatcher’s paradigm concerning public services. Renovating schools and hospitals was done with a close link with the private sector which helped build and run them.

Blair and Brown’s choice to go along and not to regulate globalisation transformed London and the United Kingdom into the hub of an unregulated economy, completely "open", where only the richest can stay above ground. An example: stock-market speculation drives the middle-classes out of town centres.

Hidden behind this pragmatism, Blair imposed policies which were rejected not only by the unions but also by many members of the Labour Party, the media and also by the public. Renovating the London Underground led to a long battle against a public service run by the private sector. The mayor, Ken Livingstone, was opposed to this privatization but Blair and Brown pûshed it through, showing that their pragmatism was a mere slogan.

HUMA: Was Tony Blair a social democrat?

In France, on the Left and especially on the Left of the Socialist Party, this term is assimilated with the Right. It is a short-cut. During the thirty-year boom period after World War II, the social democrats were not particularly on the Right, Great Britain included. Their agenda consisted of a policies geared towards equal redistribution of the wealth. This is not the policy that Blair adopted. With him, workers, civil servants and the middle-class of the private sector have been left out.

It is amusing to hear some elements in the French media talking about a ’socially-sensitive Blair’ whereas he has actually re-used Thatcher’s neoliberal recipes and promoted the interests of the advocates of the financial capitalism. No, he has done less than what was necessary. After twenty years with an ultra-liberal government, after Thatcher’s disastrous privatizations, the people wqere fed up with neo-liberalism and they wanted a real renovation of the public services and more equality. They did not expect a revolution but a more social democrat policy. Blairism was not able to face the task. Blair lacked a daring touch whereas he was supported by an absolute majority. What characterized his policies was a deep social pessimism.

HUMA: Does Tony Blair come from the left wing?

MARLIÈRE: After heading a government from the left or even centrist or post-social-democrat, on what grounds can his success be judged? At the dawn of a fight in favour of social justice. Blair failed in this field. The rich prospered under Blairism. Other social categories struggled a lot. In Great Britain, the middle classes are having a hard time, which led to Blairism’s unpopularity among manual workers and white-collar workers.

HUMA: So it is not only the Iraq war which is the reason for Blair’s relative unpopularity today …

MARLIÈRE: From a British point of view the Iraq war is only part of the reason for this unpopularity. It was a huge fiasco. Everyone admits it except Tony Blair. It turned off whole categories of people who were initially supporters of Blair. For those who are called bobos in France; well-off people who do not want tax rises and put their children in public schools, but who are progressivist regarding society, environment and public morality, Iraq was really the last straw for them.

To those who say in France that Blair did relatively well except in Iraq, I say: Blair failed in Iraq and he also failed in social and economic fields. Macroeconomic results may be correct but to who did the growth profit? The rich, not the people.

HUMA: Ségolène Royal and Dominique Strauss-Kahn referred to Tony Blair at several occasions. Is there an attraction towards Blairism within the French Socialist Party?

MARLIÈRE: The French Socialist Party and all parties represented in Brussels within the European Socialist Party are undeniably attracted to it. There are those who think Blair did what was best. You quoted Royal and Dominique Strauss-Kahn - I agree. But there are still some socialists who think Blairism has nothing to do with the social democratic Left, that he is now on the right and he must be fought. Strauss-Kahn carefully studied Blairism, he has close contacts with its dignitaries. He thinks that French socialism should be inspired by it; that is his target, it is ideological. Royal’s campaign can be said to have been Blairite. She even went beyond this when she criticised the 35-hour week and the minimum wage (incredible! - even Blair raised the minimum wage.) She also adopted some of Blair’s system of "flexibility". I think that in a world where there are huge socio-economic uncertainties, where the lower classes suffer from restructuring, relocations, reduced purchasing power, a left-wing government should protect these categories of the population and not reinforce neoliberal deregulation as Blair did by saying: consider yourself lucky to have a job, even a low paid and flexible one.

Today, the major political opposition is no longer between the left and the right. It is an opposition which crosses social democrat parties and which opposes Blairites and progressivists.

HUMA: Nicolas Sarkozy also showed his close relation with Tony Blair…

MARLIÈRE: It is actually logical that Nicolas Sarkozy refers to Blair on economic matters, approves of his security policies and shares his admiration towards the United-States. It is a known fact. Between the two men, there is an admiration and mutual sympathy. Blair’s policies and Sarkozy’s intentions coincide.

HUMA: What lessons can be taught to the French Left about Blairism?

MARLIÈRE: Blair was able to be elected easily because of the special political situations, after twenty years of Thatcherism and of defeat of the British Left even at the base; from the miner’s strike until Neil Kinnock brought the Labour party back on the scene. He had prepared the ground by getting rid of figures from the Left of the Labour Party; not only TrotskYites but staunch social democrats who have been gradually pushed aside within a decade. The way the party was run became more often based on a plebiscite and it made the leader more powerful.

When Blair became leader in 1994, he just had to to apply his policies. This is an important point. Then, he came into power. Meanwhile, the Conservatives faced a visceral rejection and there was a great call from the people for a change. Despite the failures of the last years, despite everything the Left and especially the Socialist Party are blamed for, France remains culturally, ideologically a lot further to the Left than Great Britain. The argument that there is a general movement of the French society towards the right has not been proven. On the contrary, all qualitative surveys show that there are a strong expectations for social policies. That is all the genius of Sarkozy’s strategy of wooing the Left voters during his campaign to favour a neoliberal hub. It enabled him to win an election which the Left should have enables him to win. It would be suicidal for the Left to import Blairism and its social pessimism in France, to promote a policy which would discourage what on the contrary should be encouraged: a desire for more solidarity and social justice.

Translator’s Note:

Philippe Marliere is a senior lecturer in French politics at University College, London. He has been awarded the Marcel Liebman Chair in political science by the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) for 2007 ...

Traduction :
 By Jonathan Pierre

French article :
 http://www.humanite.fr/2007-07-02_P...



Leave a comment
Print this article





Public Apology to Women of the World from The American Republic (Hypatia of Alex
Monday 31 - 15:21
by Willam Morgan
YES, THERE WILL BE ELECTION FRAUD, AND ON A GRAND SCALE
Sunday 23 - 18:32
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Hillary Clinton will be first female President 2017
Monday 10 - 17:21
by Willam Morgan
Police Shootings: Law, Policy, and Accountability
Thursday 6 - 14:22
by William John Cox
AMERICA DESERVES BETTER, BUT EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE WORLD DESERVES BETTER
Thursday 29 - 18:02
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Back to School for Fascist Dupont-Aignan
Thursday 15 - 11:32
by Nouveau Comité de Vigilance des Intellectuels Antifascistes
The Presidency: Character Matters
Friday 9 - 15:06
by William John Cox
WHY HILLARY IS THE PERFECT PERSON TO SECURE OBAMA’S LEGACY
Tuesday 30 - 18:08
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Remake of Ben Hur in 2020 planned by new motion picture studio
Friday 26 - 15:50
by Wallace
THE CASE FOR DONALD TRUMP
Monday 22 - 19:32
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES IS DEAD
Thursday 11 - 06:42
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
DONALD TRUMP AND THE GENIUS OF IDIOCY
Friday 5 - 00:47
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
FOOLING MOST OF THE PEOPLE MOST OF THE TIME IS WHAT AMERICAN POLITICS ARE ABOUT,
Friday 29 - 18:13
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
A message of your fellow striking workers from France
Tuesday 12 - 20:49
by Info’Com-CGT
The Right to Vote, Effectively
Friday 8 - 22:20
by William John Cox
Fourth of July Lies
Sunday 3 - 19:41
by June C. Terpstra
Who Should Make Political Policy, the People or the Politicians?
Friday 24 - 15:14
by William John Cox
Hollow Women of the Hegemon Part II: Atrocity Enabling Harpies
Tuesday 21 - 18:49
by Dr. June Terpstra
The American Republic Manifestum book is being made into a Movie
Saturday 11 - 15:54
by William Morgan
Write-in Voting and Political Protest
Wednesday 1 - 15:05
by William John Cox
Yves Bouvier art battle plays out in online and social media arena
Tuesday 31 - 21:12
by Dean Bagley
Damaged Candidate Clinton Can’t Call Out Trump
Friday 27 - 13:53
by Daniel Patrick Welch
PLEDGE OF THE NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY
Tuesday 24 - 21:53
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
LET TEXAS SECEDE
Thursday 19 - 00:53
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
LAS TRES ERRES A LA ENÉSIMA POTENCIA.-
Monday 16 - 15:35
by FREDDY SUBDIAGA
DEMAGOGIA POPULISTA...
Monday 16 - 15:26
by FREDDY SUBDIAGA
Oligarchs Won’t Let You Vote Their Wars Away
Wednesday 11 - 20:24
by Daniel Patrick Welch
AN AMERICAN ORIGINAL: JOHN KERRY - FROM HIS REMARKABLE RECENT COMMENCEMENT ADDR
Monday 9 - 20:40
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton support the American Republic Manifestum
Monday 9 - 16:37
by William Morgan
Transformation: A Student-Led Mass Political Movement
Monday 25 - 19:28
by William John Cox
Algerian Feminists react to ’Hijab Day’ in Paris 2016
Monday 25 - 01:13
THE ILLUSION OF RIGHTS
Friday 22 - 18:45
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
US is real superpredator pretending to be victim
Monday 18 - 22:23
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Gaiacomm International has accidently created a fusion reaction/ignition.
Sunday 17 - 17:01
by William Morgan
Clinton’s Campaign Continues to Highlight Horrible Hillary
Saturday 9 - 00:57
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Armoiries racistes à Harvard : Plaidoyer pour la réflexion socio-historique
Thursday 7 - 18:56
by Samuel Beaudoin Guzzo
THANK YOU MISSISSIPPI FOR YOUR HATE
Wednesday 6 - 02:02
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
The PKK in Iraq: “We are ready to fight ISIS everywhere in the world”
Monday 4 - 14:33
by InfoAut
Clinton Crashes and Burns, Sanders Will Win (But hold off on the applause)
Friday 1 - 22:33
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Confirming Supreme Court Justices and Electing Presidents
Friday 1 - 20:59
by William John Cox

home | webmaster



Follow-up of the site's activity
RSS Bellaciao En


rss FR / rss IT / rss ES



Bellaciao hosted by DRI

Organize, agitate, educate, must be our war cry. Susan B. Anthony
Facebook Twitter Google+
DAZIBAO
I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name
Thursday 10 March
©Olivier Jobard/Myop I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM IS A RIGHT In the phrase « right to asylum », every word matters. Under the law, every person who is persecuted because of his or her political opinions or because of his or her identity, every person that is endangered by violence, war or misery has a RIGHT to seek asylum in another country The aim of this petition is to collect (...)
read more...
Neo-Nazis and far-right protesters in Ukraine 3 live-stream
Friday 24 January
2 comments
The far-right in Ukraine are acting as the vanguard of a protest movement that is being reported as pro-democracy. The situation on the ground is not as simple as pro-EU and trade versus pro-Putin and Russian hegemony in the region. When US Senator John McCain dined with Ukraine’s opposition leaders in December, he shared a table and later a stage with the leader of the extreme far-right Svoboda party Oleh Tyahnybok. This is Oleh Tyahnybok, he has claimed a "Moscow-Jewish mafia" (...)
read more...
Hugo Chavez is dead (video live)
Wednesday 6 March
by : Collective BELLACIAO
1 comment
President Hugo Chavez companeros venezueliano died after a long battle with cancer.
read more...
International initiative to stop the war in Syria Yes to democracy, no to foreign intervention!
Thursday 13 December
Your support here: http://www.peaceinsyria.org/support.php We, the undersigned, who are part of an international civil society increasingly worried about the awful bloodshed of the Syrian people, are supporting a political initiative based on the results of a fact-finding mission which some of our colleagues undertook to Beirut and Damascus in September 2012. This initiative consists in calling for a delegation of highranking personalities and public figures to go to Syria in order to (...)
read more...
THE KU KLUX KLAN ONCE AGAIN CONTROLS INDIANA
Monday 12 November
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
7 comments
At first glance, the results of America’s 2012 election appear to be a triumph for social, racial, and economic justice and progress in the United States: California voters passed a proposition requiring the rich to shoulder their fair share of the tax burden; Two states, Colorado and Washington, legalized the recreational use of marijuana, while Massachusetts approved the use of marijuana for medical purposes; Washington and two other states, Maine and Maryland, legalized same-sex (...)
read more...
I’VE DECIDED TO "WASTE" MY VOTE
Sunday 28 October
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
In a 2004 episode of Comedy Central’s animated series South Park, an election was held to determine whether the new mascot for the town’s elementary school would be a “giant douche” or a “turd sandwich.” Confronted with these two equally unpalatable choices, one child, Stan Marsh, refused to vote at all, which resulted in his ostracization and subsequent banishment from the town. Although this satirical vulgarity was intended as a commentary on the two (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART IV
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART III If there is one major inconsistency in life, it is that young people who know little more than family, friends and school are suddenly, at the age of eighteen, supposed to decide what they want to do for the rest of their lives. Unfortunately, because of their limited life experiences, the illusions they have about certain occupations do not always comport to the realities. I discovered this the first time I went to college. About a year into my studies, I (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART III
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART IV Disillusioned with the machinations of so-called “traditional” colleges, I became an adjunct instructor at several “for-profit” colleges. Thanks largely to the power and pervasiveness of the Internet, “for-profit” colleges (hereinafter for-profits) have become a growing phenomenon in America. They have also been the subject of much political debate and the focus of a Frontline special entitled College Inc. Unlike traditional (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART II
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART III PART IV Several years ago, a young lady came into the college where I was teaching to inquire about a full-time instructor’s position in the sociology department. She was advised that only adjunct positions were available. Her response was, “No thanks. Once an adjunct, always an adjunct.” Her words still echo in my mind. Even as colleges and universities raise their tuition costs, they are relying more and more on adjunct instructors. Adjuncts are (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART I
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART II PART III PART IV When The Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution over two hundred years ago, Americans were blessed with many rights considered to be “fundamental.” One conspicuously missing, however, was the right to an education. This was not surprising given the tenor of the times. America was primarily an agrarian culture, and education, especially higher education, was viewed as a privilege reserved for the children of the rich and (...)
read more...
ONE SOLITARY LIFE, PART TWO
Monday 30 July
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
3 comments
If there is one universal question that haunts all human beings at some point in their lives, it is, “Why do we die?” Death, after all, is the great illogic. It ultimately claims all, the rich and the poor, the mighty and the small, the good and the evil. Death also has the capability to make most human pursuits—such as the quest for wealth, fame and power—vacuous and fleeting. Given this reality, I have often wondered why so many people are still willing to (...)
read more...
HOW MUCH CORRUPTION CAN DEMOCRACY ENDURE?
Thursday 28 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
6 comments
How much corruption can a “democracy” endure before it ceases to be a democracy? If five venal, mendacious, duplicitous, amoral, biased and (dare I say it) satanic Supreme Court “justices”—John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy—have their way, America will soon find out. In several previous articles for Pravda.Ru, I have consistently warned how the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision is one of the (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS, PART TWO
Tuesday 12 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
1 comment
Imagine, if you will, that the United States government passes a law banning advertisers from sponsoring commercials on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show or Rupert Murdoch’s Fox (Faux) “News” Network. On one hand, there would be two decided advantages to this ban: The National IQ would undoubtedly increase several percentage points, and manipulative pseudo-journalists would no longer be able to appeal to the basest instincts in human nature for ratings and profit while (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS
Thursday 7 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Pravda.Ru Legal Editor
4 comments
LIVE, from the State that brought you Senator Joseph McCarthy, Wisconsin voters now proudly present, fresh from his recall election victory, Governor Scott Walker! At first glance, it is almost unfathomable that anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have voted to retain Scott Walker as Wisconsin’s governor. This, after all, is a man who openly declared he is trying to destroy the rights of workers through a “divide and conquer” strategy; who received 61% of the (...)
read more...
PEOPLE WITHOUT SOULS
Tuesday 13 March
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
2 comments
A question I’ve frequently been asked since I began writing for Pravda.Ru in 2003 is, “Why did you become disillusioned with the practice of law?” This question is understandable, particularly since, in most people’s minds, being an attorney is synonymous with wealth and political power. I’ve always been reluctant to answer this question for fear it will discourage conscientious and ethical people from pursuing careers in the legal profession—a (...)
read more...