Home > Beyond the Bulge- Look into Bush’s eyes

Beyond the Bulge- Look into Bush’s eyes

by Open-Publishing - Saturday 16 October 2004
5 comments

Edito


THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES & SEEING WHAT IS BUSH’S BRAIN DOING???

I watched as much of the last Presidential debate as I could stomach, even on the tiny browser window of the New York Times live video feed I was watching (4:00 am in somewhere in Western Europe) some thing became completely obvious...... Bush was listening to something, listening intently even sometimes as he spoke, and especially when he was first to answer the question. Importantly. anyone can see this for themselves beyond any doubt, please let me explain.

Any NLP (Neurolinguistic Programing) practitioner or any Therapist worth their salt, or for that matter any half decent Sales person, will tell you that the movement of someone eyes shows what there brain is doing. In NLP it is known as “eye accessing cues” http://www.nlpu.com/Articles/artic14.htm (also see references below). http://www.nlp-now.co.uk/nlp_eye_accessing_cues.htm

This has been studied and proven and written about in many many Scientific Journals, and considered common knowledge for any professional dealing day to day with the idiosyncrasies of human behavior. Movement of the eyes down ant to the left is commonly known as auditory digital that is, internal dialogue, inner self talk or intent listening.

Think of it this way, some one is having a casual conversation on a mobile phone and they look around but you can see that some of there attention is with there listening. The conversation gets serious, the head goes down and the eyes look down and usually a little to the left when they are concentrating on listening, it’s as if to block out all other input, such as visual input, to understand what they are hearing better.

This is exactly what Bush was doing looking down and a little to the left immediately after a question was asked and at that stage his words where halting and uncertain because he’s still listening, then a kind of glassy eyed stare to the side of the camera as he puts it together still talking by wrote from the coaching and if he thinks he’s got it suddenly he’s making contact with the camera and facilitator and speaking for himself.

He’s obviously done a lot of this because he’s good at faking the communication, but the eye movements give it away beyond any doubt. These eye movements show how the brain is processing information at any moment, you can do the experiment, ask someone to listen very carefully to a song or sound your about to play for the them and watch there eyes.

Don’t be mistaken this can’t be faked , the movement of the eyes always shows what is going on in the brain. If you do try to fake it it looks strained and weird (would explain a lot about GWB) and you know that there is something hidden going on!

The point about all of this is... first of all he’s deceiving the American (and Worlds) people by presenting himself as an able debater when he’s not.... Secondly he’s obviously highly practiced in this type of deception, ie he’s a good (actually world class) liar. Thirdly he is unable to put together any sound argument on the issues by himself or to think originally when it’s urgently required (we’ve seen this before), not good credentials for a world leader with access to so much power (think of it as being like putting an idiot relative in charge of a heavy machinery) In summary we have an idiot, liar being controlled by someone more intelligent running a good part of the globe for reasons we don’t know about.

The really interesting thing about this is.. this kind of evidence doesn’t need any kind of external authority to ratify it, people can check for themselves read the data and look at the video, and you will see with different wiser eyes. Tell everyone!

Feel free to copy disseminate or quote this writing in any way, do not however misrepresent it dishonestly, condemn it out of hand or butcher any of it’s content in any way, or I guarantee that the divine spirit of truth will reek it’s karmic revenge on you with your dying breath (or quite possibly before that). Just be content to criticize the grammar and amateurish sentence construction and feel free to use any spelling mistakes to make yourself feel superior. kalki_blog (at) yahoo.com

Other References

Breitling, D., & Bonnet, K. (1985). Lateralization of GSR, lateral eye movements and a visual half-fields recognition task. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 7, 140-143

Bruce, P. R., Herman, J. F., & Stern, J. (1982). Lateral eye movements and the recall of spatial information in a familiar, large-scale environment. Neuropsychologica, 20, 505-508.

Coleman, S. & Zenhausern, R. (1979) Processing speed, laterality patterns, and memory encoding as a function of hemispheric dominance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 357-360.

Day, M. E. (1967) An eye-movement indicator of individual differences in the psychological organization of attentional process and anxiety. Journal of Psychology, 66, 51-62.

Ehrlichman, H., & Weinberger, A. (1978) Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1080-1101.

Falcone, D. J., & Loder, K. (1984). A modified lateral eye movement measure, the right hemisphere, and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 823-830.

Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (1975). Defense mechanisms, psychosomatic symptomatology, and conjugate lateral eye movements. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 416-420.

Gur, R.E., Gur, R.C., & Harris (1975) Cerebral activation, as measured by subjects’ lateral eye movements is influenced by experimenter location. Neuropsychologia, 13, 35-44.

Huang, M. S., & Byrne, B. (1978). Cognitive style and lateral eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 85-90.

Hugdahl, K., & Carlgren, H. E. (1981). Hemispheric asymmetry as indexed by differences in direction of initial conjugate lateral eye movements (CLEMS) in response to verbal, spatial, and emotional tasks. Journal of Mind and Behavior 2, 259-270.

Jamieson, J. L., & Sellick, T. B. (1985) Effects of subject-to- experimenter distance and instructions on lateral eye movement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 155-159.

Kinsbourne, M. (1972) Eye and head turning indicate cerebral lateralization. Science, 176, 539-541.

Leboeuf, A., McKay, P., & Clarke, K. (1983). Lateral eye movements and dream recall in males: a reappraisal. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 3, 61-68.

Lenhart, R. E. (1985) The effects of distance between interactants and subject anxiety on conjugate lateral eye movements. Brain and Cognition, 4(3), 328-337.

Ogorman, J. & Siddle, D. (1981). The effects of question type and experimenter position on bilateral differences in electrodermal activity and conjugate lateral eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 49, 43-51.

Owens, W., & Limber, J. (1983). Lateral eye movement as a measure of cognitive ability and style. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 711-719.

Parrott, C. A. (1983). Personality characteristics associated with lateral eye movement patterns. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 867-874.

Swinnen, S. (1984). Some evidence for the hemispheric asymmetry model of lateral eye movements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 79-88.

Thompson, M., Greenberg, R. P., & Fisher, S. (1982). Defense mechanisms, somatic symptoms, and lateral eye movements in females. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 939-942.

Tucker, G. H., & Suib, M. R. (1978). Conjugate lateral eye movement (CLEM) direction and its relationship to performance on verbal and visuospatial tasks. Neuropsychologica, 16, 251-254

Van Nuys, D. (1985) Lateral eye movement and dream recall: II sex differences and handedness. International Journal of Psychosomatics, 31, 3-7.

Weiten, W., & Etaugh, C. F. (1974) Lateral eye movement as related to verbal and perceptual-motor skills and values. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 423-428.

Basic NLP Eye Accessing Cues

As a result of these studies, and many hours of observations of people from different cultures and racial backgrounds from all over the world, the following eye movement patterns were identified (Dilts, 1976, 1977; Grinder, DeLozier and Bandler, 1977; Bandler and Grinder, 1979; Dilts, Grinder, Bandler and DeLozier, 1980):

Eyes Up and Left: Non-dominant hemisphere visualization - i.e., remembered imagery (Vr). Eyes Up and Right: Dominant hemisphere visualization - i.e., constructed imagery and visual fantasy (Vc). Eyes Lateral Left: Non-dominant hemisphere auditory processing - i.e., remembered sounds, words, and "tape loops" (Ar) and tonal discrimination. Eyes Lateral Right: Dominant hemisphere auditory processing - i.e., remembered sounds and words (Ac) and "tape loops" (such as nursery rhymes), as well as tonal discrimination. Eyes Down and Left: Internal dialogue, or inner self-talk (Ad). Eyes Down and Right: Feelings, both tactile and visceral (K). Eyes Straight Ahead, but Defocused or Dilated: Quick access of almost any sensory information; but usually visual.

This pattern appears to be constant for right handed people throughout the human race (with the possible exception of the Basques, whose population appears to contain a fair number of ’exceptions to the rule’). Subsequent studies (Loiselle, 1985 and Buckner, Reese and Reese, 1987) have supported the NLP claim that eye movements both reflect and influence key cognitive componants of thought. Many left handed people, however, tend to be reversed from left to right. That is, their eye accessing cues are the mirror image of those of the average right hander. They look down and left for feelings, instead of down and right. Similarly, they look up and to the right to remember visual imagery, instead of up and to the left, and so on. A small number of people (including ambidextrous and a few right handed people) will be reversed in their some of their eye accessing cues (their visual eye movements, for example), but not the others.

To explore the relationship between eye movements and thinking for yourself, find a partner, ask the following questions, and observe his or her eye movements. For each question keep track of your partner’s eye movements in one of the boxes (following the questions below) by using marks, lines or numbers that represent the sequence of positions you observe.

1. Visual Remembered: Think of the color of your car. What kind of pattern is on your bedspread? Think of the last time you saw someone running. Who were the first five people you saw this morning? 2. Visual Construction: Imagine an outline of yourself as you might look from six feet above us and see it turning into a city skyline. Can you imagine the top half of a toy dog on the bottom half of a green hippopotamus? 3. Auditory Remembered: Can you think of one of your favorite songs? Think of the sound of clapping. How does your car’s engine sound? 4. Auditory Constructed: Imagine the sound of a train’s whistle changing into the sound of pages turning. Can you hear the sound of a saxophone and the sound of your mother’s voice at the same time? 5. Auditory Digital (Internal Self Talk): Take a moment and listen to the sound of your own inner voice. How do you know it is your voice? In what types of situations do you talk to yourself the most? Think of the kinds of things that you say to yourself most often. 6. Kinesthetic Remembered: (Tactile) When was the last time you felt really wet? Imagine the feelings of snow in your hands. What does a pine cone feel like? When was the last time you touched a hot cooking utensil? (Visceral/Emotional) Can you think of a time you felt satisfied about something you completed? Think of what it feels like to be exhausted. When was the last time you felt impatient? 7. Kinesthetic Construction: (Tactile) Imagine the feelings of stickiness turning into the feelings of sand shifting between your fingers. Imagine the feelings of dog’s fur turning into the feelings of soft butter. (Visceral/Emotional) Imagine the feelings of frustration turning into the feeling of being really motivated to do something. Imagine the feeling of being bored turning into feeling silly about feeling bored.

It is important to keep in mind, as you are observing and tracking eye movements, that many people will already have habitual eye movements, related to their primary representational modality. A highly visual person may tend to look up and to the left or right, regardless of which sensory modality is assumed by your question. If you ask such a person to think of his or her "favorite song," the person may visualize the cover of the record, tape or CD in order to remember the name of the song. A kinesthetically oriented person may look down and check his or her feelings to determine how he or she feels about several songs in order to know which one is his or her "favorite." Thus it is important to ask people what they actually did in their minds as they were answering the questions in order to get an accurate sense of what their eye movements signified.

Once you feel confident in eye movements as accessing cues, and in your ability to "read" them, there are many ways they can be used. As was mentioned earlier, habitual eye movements reflect a person’s preferred sensory modality. If you ask someone, "What is something that is really important to you? Think of it now," the placement of the person’s eyes as he or she is answering your question will probably tell you a lot about that person’s most valued representational system.

Eye movements can also be used to determine how truthful or congruent a person is being. If a person is describing an event that he or she has witnessed or participated in, for instance, the person’s eyes should move primarily to his or her left (if the person is right handed), indicating memory access. If the person looks up and to the right a lot, however, it is likely that the person is constructing or reconstructing some aspect of the experience he or she is describing. This may indicate that the person is either uncertain or being untruthful about what he or she is saying. The most common application of eye positions in NLP is to determine the representational strategies a person is using in order to think or make a decision. Since many aspects of people’s thinking processes are unconscious to them, spontaneous eye movements can be an extremely important part of eliciting and modeling a person’s inner strategies for decision making, learning, motivation, memory, etc.

Forum posts

  • What an impressive argument in support of what I believe ALL Americans know now was true and in character for our smarmy President. Many of his supporters probably think that was cool.

    Bush is a Great Deceiver. Without a doubt he was being fed responses in the first Presidential debate.

    Let’s see, what does the Bible say, that there will emerge a leader who is satan reincarnate.

    I can accept that. Look at his record. (hey, I’m more than half serious here)

    What has Bush EVER done from a humanitarian perspective that wasn’t a photo-op?

    On another note...I could never understand this nation’s love affair with Barbara Bush. One look past her carefully crafted "cool Grandma" persona and into HER eyes told you everything. Chilling.

    Blood tells.

    My hat’s off to your incisive writing. And, Einstein couldn’t spell either, I have heard..so no worries there.

    Here’s a brief insight regarding

    "The thought processes of the ’unshakable’ Bush voter"

    I spoke with an acquaintance recently who told me that she was a lifelong Republican and was going to vote for Bush. Amazed ( I had always thought her reasonably intelligent, if somewhat erratic in behavior)

    I asked " ..but...but..why? I’m sure you know his record of corporate giveaways,,,,and what he’s doing to destroy civil rights, especially women’s rights...?"

    She replied she was votingfor Bush because she ALSO had a DWI many years ago. She decided not to hide that fact about herself anymore, and that ...if BUSH could admit to a DWI and attain the Presidency, he had her vote. And then she laughed her weird, high pitched and truly crazy-sounding laugh. Now I know why I always cringe when she laughs.

    I didn’t even bother to tell her that Bush only admitted to the DWI offense after it was established as an incontrovertible fact.
    I tried to engage her mind regarding issues, thinking in terms other than "Republican" and "Democrat" and in therms of what thecountry needs as opposedto what we’ve gotten in the last 4 years. I recommended an amazing book about the construction of the Bush persona---a book entitled "FRAUD" by Paul Waldman,

    I had no success ( "I’m so busy I don’t have time to read anymore." )
    That explained at least a part of her abdication of responsibility. Ignorance is bliss.

    My sister is going to vote for Bush. And all her little chicks are following behind her.
    Did I mention her family is outrageously dysfunctional?
    So maybe that’s the key. Bush’s supporters are all mentally unbalanced.
    A very persuasive argument could be mounted for that, I suspect.

    There’s no doubt that we are attempting to offset a huge herd of sheep when we confront the hardcore Bush believers at the polls. Just point them in a direction and they will run themselves—and this country—off a cliff if they aren’t stopped.

    Although I knew a few of the facts about eye movement and truth, I knew nothing about the extensive studies you referenced. I had already suspected Bush was being fed answers during the debate, just because of his generally weird behavior during the debate. My right brain fought with the left as I heard him say, "Wait, let me finish!" asI was bewildered by this along with the rest of the audience. I could only think "that would have to be impossible! This is a PRESIDENTIAL debate! SURELY not!"
    When the Bush Bulge news and the picture came out, I was outraged that my intuition was correct.

    What bothers me is the silence that has issued from the Democratic party regarding this issue of crass dishonesty. I think they don’t want to alienate anyone by negativity. Probably a smart political move. But there’s a part of me that wanted to hear them raising forty kinds of hell to have it investigated.

    This has made me register a chilling thought: Remember how Hitler came to power?

    A negligent citizenry

    A strong and ruthless inner circle (SS) (Chaney, Rove, Ashcroft. etc)

    Manipulation of the media through intimidation

    Fear mongering (the Jewish "threat")(terrorism)

    Espouse "grand plans" like (eliminating the Jewish threat)( spreading democracy)

    And if anyone objects, accuse them of a lack of patriotism.

    I see where Bush got his template.

    I can only hold high my hopes of this election 2004 and remember that, no matter what, Bush is vile and must be removed from the White House.

    There’s also a part of me, at this juncture, that says, "Wait. Kerry and Bush both went to Yale, Skull and Bones and all that. They both have huge corporate backers. Is this simply the changing of the Guard?" Allowing us a few more years of illusion till the hammer falls?
    Sound paranoid? Yep. But. Makes you think, "hmmm..."

    Is this the last chance we will be given to start taking action to protect our country from domination?
    Our last chance to push back the tide of complete corporate control?
    Will our civil rights continue to be methodicaly stripped from us?
    Will all semblance of a government concerned with humanitarian issues be disposed of?

    I’m thinking one step at a time, to make sure we do not continue to be treated like cattle:

    Step #1: dethrone King George.

    Step #2: Hold Kerry’s feet to the fire and dog his tracks to make sure he keeps the majority of his promises.

    Step #3: Start establishing a truly powerful party of the people FOR true democracy.

    Step #4: Take back our country, one election at a time. Local. State. Federal.

    By Ms Liberty
    Surviving Sister of a Viet Nam casualty

    • A really wonderful and informative piece on this subject. I think I’ll add it to my list of links as well, if thats OK. Well done!
      For further BULGE coverage check out my site:

      http://bushwired.blogspot.com/

      We have an extensive photo gallery, News, tons of links, video... etc. Even an art gallery. Organized and easy to find.

      Today in the US, the buge topic has heated up (again). CNN did a surprisingly in-depth segment on the issue, and showed the various photos from web sites, instaed of the usual "fuzzy bulge". Slowly, the bulge topic is becoming more than an internet rumor. They also discussed the various theories floating around the net without laughing at them.

      Great post!

      Icone
      "editor"
      BUSH WIRED

    • Is Bush wired AND hiding a health problem?
      Is Bush wired AND hiding a health problem?

      Sat. October 30: Just released

      http://bulgegate.blogspot.com

      .....

      Don’t know the story? Get up to speed:

      Would you be upset if Bush failed to disclose something critically important to you?

      President Bush has a bulge on his back. It’s been called "Bulgegate" and the "The Bush Bulge" and it has appeared in all of the 2004 Presidential debates. The "bulge" has been called a "badly tailored shirt" which the President claims to have worn in all 3 debates, mind you.

      The "3 bad shirts theory" is to the media, it seems, acceptable: the President has a wardrobe full of bad expensive shirts! We have an obvious bulge, so do we have a transmitter, defibrillator, or something else?

      There are also two wires-like objects found on President Bush. Links are which lead to more information regarding the "bulge". Are the "bulges" and "wires" connected in some way?

      These insights have compelled me to ask in my latest article: could it be a defibrillator? The President has a genetic disposition to AF (read study) and has not submitted for a physical this year which goes against tradition. Why has the President not submitted for a physical?

      Read the entire article here: http://bulgegate.blogspot.com

      ........................................
      BULGEGATE UPDATE — http://bulgegate.blogspot.com
      ........................................

      The "Bulge-gate" news story has gotten a lot of attention, largely being supported by the suspicion President Bush was wearing an earpiece in the debates. To support this theory we have seen a bulge on his back, past evidence of earpiece use, a wire under his tie, and strange speech patterns.

      Bush could be "wired" and also have a health problem because 2 relevant tracks of evidence have consistently appeared. I am going to publish another photo soon to demonstrate that if the Bulge on Bush’s back was a communications device, it was big. If it was something else, we need to know what it is.

      I don’t suspect many believe it is only a health related issue happening here, I certainly don’t. Bush could actually be both "wired" and have had a medical device on, nothing has made this impossible so far, although statistically less likely.

      I wanted to restate the defibrillator case to keep all options alive as long as there is evidence to support it. That increases the chances of important information coming forward.

      .......................................

      Cannonfire (also of note are the articles about potential voter fraud) continues to publish almost daily on the evolution of the Bulge story, noting:

      "The bulge-spotters’ argument may be better served if we keep these pictures as far as possible from the Adobe treatment. Any use of Photoshop, however innocent in intention, allows Bush apologists to howl that evil librul hoaxters concocted the entire controversy."

      This is a good point, and as the evidence builds that sentiment will become reinforced. These techniques need to be used carefully and to enhance evidence, not generate it.

      http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2004/10/bulge-spotting-new-national-sport.html

      .......................................

      BushWired has updated its extensive archive of links, evidence, comments and news articles. See the latest:

      http://www.bushwired.blogspot.com

      .......................................

      Finally Chris Suellentrop (deputy Washington bureau chief for Slate.com), is interviewed on WNYC’s radio show "On the Media":

      http://www.wnyc.org/onthemedia/transcripts/transcripts_101504_bulge.html

      Excerpts:

      "
      BROOKE GLADSTONE: So where is most of the coverage of this mysterious bulge coming from?

      CHRIS SUELLENTROP: There was speculation about this in 2000, believe it or not....

      ...
      BROOKE GLADSTONE: And what’s your answer?

      CHRIS SUELLENTROP: I think it’s definitely a story to write about [...] I think the press obviously missed the Swiftboat story for a long time [...] I’ve never seen a, a wrinkle in somebody’s clothes that came out as a rectangle. [LAUGHTER] So, you know, I think it’s a real question.

      ...
      BROOKE GLADSTONE: Do you think the internet is helping reporters to get to the bottom of this, or is it having the effect of discrediting the whole story from the outset?

      CHRIS SUELLENTROP: [...] the idea that there was a rectangle on the president’s back became obscured by the fact that all these left-wing bloggers were saying "the president is wired," which was sort of a leap unsupported by the evidence, and so then people immediately dismissed the rectangle and said this whole thing is phony; [...] Now, having said that, without them — would we be talking about it? I don’t know. It’s a good question.

      ...
      BROOKE GLADSTONE: So the White House would like it to go away. Do you think reporters would also like it to go away?

      CHRIS SUELLENTROP: Probably. I mean look, I think reporters want to set the agenda and not have the agenda set for them, and for better or for worse, if they feel like they’ve gotten pushed to this story and they don’t think it’s worthy of covering, it’s the kind of thing they want to go away.

      ...

      BROOKE GLADSTONE: [...] Do you find that a lot of mainstream reporters are using the excuse of covering the coverage to cover the story?

      CHRIS SUELLENTROP: That’s right. Now it’s covering the blogs or covering the buzz on the internet. So you can say well, we’re not giving credence to this story — we’re just covering what people are chatting about on line. And some of the people that have sat out the story have said, look, we don’t want to do that story.
      "

      .....................................

      A few days ago photo enhancements exposes a wire leading from the bulge on the President’s back, Salon.com has also published on the same topic. Read both accounts here:

      http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/29/bulge/index_np.html
      http://bulgegate.blogspot.com (test the theory for yourself!)
      ...

      http://www.blueoregon.com/2004/10/bush_busted_by_.html
      Says: "Well, now it appears that one of the most respected scientists in the photo analysis field has determined conclusively: Bush had some sort of artificial device under his coat."
      ...

      Puppetstring has been updated with a comment I grabbed from Colin Green at:

      http://www.journalscape.com/Colin/2004-10-29-11:02

      "
      If we follow this theory through the bulge would be the receiver/relayer, the wire up the right shoulder is to an inductance loop, perhaps in his collar, and it also looks to me that there is a wire traveling down his back, which would correspond to the wire seen behind his tie. This wire that we can see is actually quite prominent by way of its thickness, say 5mm. Such thickness would only normally be used to convey power - from a battery pack somewhere on his person, to the receiver on his back. Also note that the tie wire disappears into the left hand side of Bush’s jacket - the same side as the wire seen own his lower back.
      "

      Go to and scroll to the bottom:

      http://puppetstring.blogspot.com/2004/10/was-there-wire-behind-that-tie_23.html#comments

      ’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’

      Something to remember: http://img44.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img44&image=badtailor.jpg
      READ MORE HERE:

      http://www.bushwired.blogspot.com

      http://www.bushbulge.com (send an automatic letter to the media)

      http://www.puppetstring.blogspot.com

      http://cannonfire.blogspot.com

      http://bulgegate.blogspot.com

      http://isbushwired.com

      ...
      http://politicalcommentator.blogspot.com

      ...
      ’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’

  • kerry was wired too.

    Stop looking at the cropped pics of bush and picking what you like, I don’t like bush, but this story is about as usefull as bush. Your going to end up with egg on your face when it’s discovered that kerry had the same thing. That is why they don’t even talk about it on his blog...they erase messages that speak of bush’s bulge...why? Because they’re both wired and the more scrutiny over the pics...the more a republican will do the same, then what will you do? These are bones brothers for christ sake...wake up. There is a conspiracy to "wire bush", "fake documents for Iraq", "the eternal hunt for a non-existant enemy", "patriot act will keep us safe"....but not between two kissing cousin(true) bones brothers(true)?(bush=harsh war // kerry=sensitive war).....NAHHHH they’re complete opposites.LMAO

    http://www.infowars.com/print/news/bushwired.htm

    oops, guess we’ll see who runs with this...yawn.(let me guess, just like republicans, democrats don’t see it....cognitive dissonance anyone? LOL)