> Too many voting ’irregularities’ to be coincidence
7 November 2004, 05:10
Of the non-critical states, only Illinois was shown with bar charts. As many of these shouyld be shown before we can make the case that the ’coincidences’ were found only in critical states. Maybe there’s a bias here?
Of the non-critical states, only Illinois was shown with bar charts. As many of these shouyld be shown before we can make the case that the ’coincidences’ were found only in critical states. Maybe there’s a bias here?