> Scientific Analysis Suggests US Presidential Vote Counts May Have Been Altered
31 March 2005, 22:24
To those who have been attentive to the exit polling and vote discrepancies, this report comes as no surprise, though it is most welcome. What has most disheartened me have been the words of Democratic leaders in the House and Senate referring to Bush having "won" even at a time when the results in Ohio were still being contested. Their words confirmed the myth that Bush actually received more votes than Kerry and is therefore the duly elected president. How much more helpful to the public it would have been for them to refer to the discrepancies and thus suggest that the Ohio (and Florida) votes have anomalies that call their legitimacy into question.
I will forward this link to these "leaders."
To those who have been attentive to the exit polling and vote discrepancies, this report comes as no surprise, though it is most welcome. What has most disheartened me have been the words of Democratic leaders in the House and Senate referring to Bush having "won" even at a time when the results in Ohio were still being contested. Their words confirmed the myth that Bush actually received more votes than Kerry and is therefore the duly elected president. How much more helpful to the public it would have been for them to refer to the discrepancies and thus suggest that the Ohio (and Florida) votes have anomalies that call their legitimacy into question.
I will forward this link to these "leaders."