> 9/11: Possible Motives Of The Bush Administration
4 December 2005, 02:56
> 9/11: Possible Motives Of The Bush Administration
Saturday 3rd December 2005 by Phoney Tony
Your Post rambles a bit. But then, I have found that the mountain of evidence for questioning the motives of the war on terror are so complex and vast as to only allow a half-vast approach to the subject. Perhaps a daily log of information sould be developed on the internet. A page that allows the public to digest one point at a time. Elephant eating requires smaller plates and a few garnishings. Anyway thanks for the work
Hi Phoney Toney:
Dr David Ray Griffin is not the rambling type. He is a life long academic who has written many books on various topics of philosophy and theology and he possesses a unique combination of logic and capacity to act when confronted with injustice. Perhaps Griffin’s argument appears to be rambling on this website where the article has been presented as a posting as opposed to what it is; a well researched and logical argument describing possible motives that the Bush administration and/or its associated agents had in relation to making the awful and tragic events of Sept 11, 2001 a reality. So I can understand and sympathize with your request for a more easily digestible format of Dr Griffin’s arguments. However, this has been done elsewhere by others and Dr Griffin, specifically in his books:
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions- A Critique of the Kean-Zelikow Report
The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11
So, I recommend that you read both of these if you need a more structured presentation. Dr Griffin has made the argument easy to follow in these books. I believe David Ray Griffin’s books to be the best and most succinct argument that what happened on 9/11 was distorted and falsified in the "official" story. The American administration and other government authorities including Congress and Senate politicians, mainstream media, and most importantly, the 9/11 Commission finding are guilty of gross distortions and omissions.
Please take the time to read David Ray Griffin’s book.
> 9/11: Possible Motives Of The Bush Administration
Saturday 3rd December 2005 by Phoney Tony
Your Post rambles a bit. But then, I have found that the mountain of evidence for questioning the motives of the war on terror are so complex and vast as to only allow a half-vast approach to the subject. Perhaps a daily log of information sould be developed on the internet. A page that allows the public to digest one point at a time. Elephant eating requires smaller plates and a few garnishings. Anyway thanks for the work
Hi Phoney Toney:
Dr David Ray Griffin is not the rambling type. He is a life long academic who has written many books on various topics of philosophy and theology and he possesses a unique combination of logic and capacity to act when confronted with injustice. Perhaps Griffin’s argument appears to be rambling on this website where the article has been presented as a posting as opposed to what it is; a well researched and logical argument describing possible motives that the Bush administration and/or its associated agents had in relation to making the awful and tragic events of Sept 11, 2001 a reality. So I can understand and sympathize with your request for a more easily digestible format of Dr Griffin’s arguments. However, this has been done elsewhere by others and Dr Griffin, specifically in his books:
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions- A Critique of the Kean-Zelikow Report
The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11
So, I recommend that you read both of these if you need a more structured presentation. Dr Griffin has made the argument easy to follow in these books. I believe David Ray Griffin’s books to be the best and most succinct argument that what happened on 9/11 was distorted and falsified in the "official" story. The American administration and other government authorities including Congress and Senate politicians, mainstream media, and most importantly, the 9/11 Commission finding are guilty of gross distortions and omissions.
Please take the time to read David Ray Griffin’s book.
Good luck.
Blogbart
http://blogbartblog.blogspot.com/