Well presented, but not, as you hint, equivalent to alien abductions and the like. The Trilateral Commission, which has been systematically ignored by nearly all media, revolutionized American politics. David Rockefeller, essentially an introvert without his brother’s sociable skills, created quite an organization. Indeed, get your hands on the TR literature dating back to ’75 and there you’ll see virtually all of Jimmy Carter’s Administration listed
, from Cyrus Vance to Brezezinski. Why is this important? Because Rockefeller - a Republican and politically correct mercantilist - saw the opening created by Jerry Ford’s stumbling moment in the sun. Realizing the Republicans had no chance, he - almost like Citizen Kane changing the newspaper’s staff - moved a rather conservative Globalist group into the White House.
Sure, Carter talked about the poor, but he was far too ineffectual to do anything about traditional, Democratic issues. And Rockefeller was sure of that. He also had a sense that Carter was destined for only one term, which is why he in particular was chosen, as opposed to more prominent candidates. Which set the stage for Reagan, and from that foundation, came the Neocons.
In retrospect, there hasn’t been a genuine FDR-style Democrat in the White House since LBJ. Regardless of what you think of Clinton, he was bolstered by the growth in tech stocks, IPOs, and and a boom that was inevtiable with or without him. Also, he followed much of Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America, i.e., repealing affirmative action, etc. Arguably, Clinton was the best Republican president in the modern era.
Why the Centrist positioning? Why rely on Dick Morris to guide him through the maze? Because he didn’t want to end up like Carter - the dustbin of history personified.
Last but not least, check out "The Crisis of Democracy" written in part by Samuel "The Clash of Civilizations" Huntington in 1976, that is if you can get your hands on it. In it, the three writers posit that the problem with democracy is, well, too much democracy. It’s startling, really. It’s virtually the same argument that was explored by the Neocons in response to the unrest in the 60s. Why did those rebellious kids storm the castle? Becuase they could. Why? Because they were too free? Too much democracy.
Unfortunately, what many people, particularly on the left, never seem to get, because they’re obsessed with chasing conspiracies, is that since 1975, the move to the center and the right, ranging from religious fundamentalists to Neocons, as well as TR, is well documented. You could hold up in a library for the next couple of years and never finish reading all the substantiation for the New World they’re been creating for over 30 years, ranging from George Gilder to Arthur Laffer, Milton Friedman to the PNAC.
This movement - conducted mainly by civilians and intellectuals - is not remotely like the secretive Masonic rites, the Illuminati or the fabled Elders of Zion. There are no secret handshakes. Every word, every plan, from the Zionist protection of Isreal to the neoimperialist reorganization of the Middle East, from lower taxes for the rich to the nouveau brand of Monetarism that strensously aims to dampen inflation regardless of the harm it may cause the middle class is right there in black and white, or should I say, black and blue.
As far as I can tell, the elaborate scenario that suggests WTC 1, 2 and 7 were wired with explosives - as well as all the concentration being devoted to this one issue - is a waste of time. WTC 7, by the way, was loaded with supplies, many of them flammable and explosive because it was designated as a storage depot for emergencies. But, let’s say for instance a sinister American team did these things. Long before they set a fuse in place, or trained Islamic hijackers to fly, or aimed a rocket at the Pentagon, the Republic was in peril. Not because of what happened in secret meetings but because of what happened right there in plain sight. Right there for virtually everybody to ignore.
More and more W. is being compared to Adolf. Certainly there are mysteries and secrets regarding the Third Reich. But for the most part "Mein Kampf" was candid and comprehensive and was often given as a wedding gift. Just as the future was right there in front of millions years before it happened, so too has the future been there for Americans to see. But, somehow they’ve been far too busy to pay sufficient attention. Too many of them are still studying the Zapruder film looking for the man on the grassy knoll, or examining charred remains from 9/11
looking for the bogeyman. Hey America, the bogeyman’s in office and he’s been doing everything his scriptwriters told him to do and if you care to spend a few worthwhile hours you too can find out what’s really going on.
Well presented, but not, as you hint, equivalent to alien abductions and the like. The Trilateral Commission, which has been systematically ignored by nearly all media, revolutionized American politics. David Rockefeller, essentially an introvert without his brother’s sociable skills, created quite an organization. Indeed, get your hands on the TR literature dating back to ’75 and there you’ll see virtually all of Jimmy Carter’s Administration listed
, from Cyrus Vance to Brezezinski. Why is this important? Because Rockefeller - a Republican and politically correct mercantilist - saw the opening created by Jerry Ford’s stumbling moment in the sun. Realizing the Republicans had no chance, he - almost like Citizen Kane changing the newspaper’s staff - moved a rather conservative Globalist group into the White House.
Sure, Carter talked about the poor, but he was far too ineffectual to do anything about traditional, Democratic issues. And Rockefeller was sure of that. He also had a sense that Carter was destined for only one term, which is why he in particular was chosen, as opposed to more prominent candidates. Which set the stage for Reagan, and from that foundation, came the Neocons.
In retrospect, there hasn’t been a genuine FDR-style Democrat in the White House since LBJ. Regardless of what you think of Clinton, he was bolstered by the growth in tech stocks, IPOs, and and a boom that was inevtiable with or without him. Also, he followed much of Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America, i.e., repealing affirmative action, etc. Arguably, Clinton was the best Republican president in the modern era.
Why the Centrist positioning? Why rely on Dick Morris to guide him through the maze? Because he didn’t want to end up like Carter - the dustbin of history personified.
Last but not least, check out "The Crisis of Democracy" written in part by Samuel "The Clash of Civilizations" Huntington in 1976, that is if you can get your hands on it. In it, the three writers posit that the problem with democracy is, well, too much democracy. It’s startling, really. It’s virtually the same argument that was explored by the Neocons in response to the unrest in the 60s. Why did those rebellious kids storm the castle? Becuase they could. Why? Because they were too free? Too much democracy.
Unfortunately, what many people, particularly on the left, never seem to get, because they’re obsessed with chasing conspiracies, is that since 1975, the move to the center and the right, ranging from religious fundamentalists to Neocons, as well as TR, is well documented. You could hold up in a library for the next couple of years and never finish reading all the substantiation for the New World they’re been creating for over 30 years, ranging from George Gilder to Arthur Laffer, Milton Friedman to the PNAC.
This movement - conducted mainly by civilians and intellectuals - is not remotely like the secretive Masonic rites, the Illuminati or the fabled Elders of Zion. There are no secret handshakes. Every word, every plan, from the Zionist protection of Isreal to the neoimperialist reorganization of the Middle East, from lower taxes for the rich to the nouveau brand of Monetarism that strensously aims to dampen inflation regardless of the harm it may cause the middle class is right there in black and white, or should I say, black and blue.
As far as I can tell, the elaborate scenario that suggests WTC 1, 2 and 7 were wired with explosives - as well as all the concentration being devoted to this one issue - is a waste of time. WTC 7, by the way, was loaded with supplies, many of them flammable and explosive because it was designated as a storage depot for emergencies. But, let’s say for instance a sinister American team did these things. Long before they set a fuse in place, or trained Islamic hijackers to fly, or aimed a rocket at the Pentagon, the Republic was in peril. Not because of what happened in secret meetings but because of what happened right there in plain sight. Right there for virtually everybody to ignore.
More and more W. is being compared to Adolf. Certainly there are mysteries and secrets regarding the Third Reich. But for the most part "Mein Kampf" was candid and comprehensive and was often given as a wedding gift. Just as the future was right there in front of millions years before it happened, so too has the future been there for Americans to see. But, somehow they’ve been far too busy to pay sufficient attention. Too many of them are still studying the Zapruder film looking for the man on the grassy knoll, or examining charred remains from 9/11
looking for the bogeyman. Hey America, the bogeyman’s in office and he’s been doing everything his scriptwriters told him to do and if you care to spend a few worthwhile hours you too can find out what’s really going on.