> URGENT ACTION TO FORCE RECOUNT IN 34 STATES, GAO INVESTIGATES
6 November 2004, 19:59
You should get a firm grasp of grammar before you try to understand politics.
John Kerry had a recount legal account that had millions of dollars, if he had any chance of winning by recount or challenging e-voting machines he would have done it. The man has dreamed of being President since he was a child; don’t you think he would have kept fighting if the vote was fraudulent.
How come when voting machines show up in Philadelphia at polling places and are already stuffed with votes for John Kerry this doesn’t bother you? I would propose that you really don’t care about voting legitimacy but about John Kerry winning.
The file was placed for the e-voting records not because they are not legitimate but because she wants to ensure that they are legitimate.
No one of any legitimacy or sound mind is challenging the legitimacy of this vote. I would suggest you attempt to think logically and about what IS true and not what you WANT to be true.
You should get a firm grasp of grammar before you try to understand politics.
John Kerry had a recount legal account that had millions of dollars, if he had any chance of winning by recount or challenging e-voting machines he would have done it. The man has dreamed of being President since he was a child; don’t you think he would have kept fighting if the vote was fraudulent.
How come when voting machines show up in Philadelphia at polling places and are already stuffed with votes for John Kerry this doesn’t bother you? I would propose that you really don’t care about voting legitimacy but about John Kerry winning.
The file was placed for the e-voting records not because they are not legitimate but because she wants to ensure that they are legitimate.
No one of any legitimacy or sound mind is challenging the legitimacy of this vote. I would suggest you attempt to think logically and about what IS true and not what you WANT to be true.