Home > ... > Forum 9574

> Sibel Edmonds: Still Silenced, But Why?

1 January 2005, 09:29

I was all set to learn from this article, but it fails to give any specific information to back up the assertions like "unimpeachable testimony" and "confirmed facts." Maybe the writer is aiming at readers who know the story already and don’t need the story background. I, for one, DO need the story background and I learned nothing about it from this particular article.

I’d appreciate anybody who can refer me to a factual summary or transcript of the situation this article is commenting about. Speaking for myself, the article lacks substance and brings to mind the typical neocon voter who incessantly CLAIMS to be backed by the facts without troubling to actually learn or teach any demonstrable fact.