> Conversations on Chemtrails- The truth about what is happening in America
29 March 2005, 18:17
Within this post I have given anyone who wants to know the facts, the SPECIFIC scientific theory, the proposed method with the DETAILS OF IMPLEMENTATION, the means by which to accomplish these goals, the COST ANALYSIS of such undertakings, and the OBSERVED results of increased albeido, all from REPUTABLE, VERIFYABLE sources with links for independent verification. There are many, many more sources, which I could cite, but this shall suffice to prove the theory.
If you really want to know what’s happening around you have a good look.
Authorized by Congress, or sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, senior researchers, faculty, theoreticians, atmospheric scientists, department heads and CEO’s from a multitude of prestigious institutions. The Smithsonian, Harvard, General Motors, Cambridge, MIT, Yale, World Resources Institute, National Center for Atmospheric Research, the Secretary General of the United Nations, Oxford, Brookings Institution, Columbia University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carnegie-Mellon University, Princeton University, Brown University, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory;
A SUMMARY:
In Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Bases conclusion, the N.A.S. (NATIONAL ACADAMY OF SCIENTISTS) found that the most effective global warming mitigation turned out to be the spraying of reflective aerosol compounds into the atmosphere utilizing commercial, military and private aircraft. This preferred mitigation method is designed to create a global atmospheric shield which would increase the planet’s albeido (reflectivity) using aerosol compounds of aluminum and barium oxides, and to introduce ozone generating chemicals into the atmosphere.".
Check any Material Safety Data Sheet and you’ll find barium clearly marked: “DANGER! MAY BE FATAL IF SWALLOWED” with the “Health Rating: 3 - Severe (Life)”.
Interestingly, the line item above it lists "Acid Aerosols" - with a weight only 26,000 lbs or so greater than the barium emissions.
Now, I don´t want to say that they are lying to the NIH about where they dump the barium (land/air), but since barium seems to be a major ingredient in these aerosol experiments, perhaps there´s a connection.
Perhaps Mr. Carnicom could comment on whether the proportions here match the composition of the aerosols he has been studying?
Cheers.
U.S. AIR FORCE EIELSON AFB AK
EPA Facility Number: 99702LSNRF2258C
2258 CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 100
EIELSON AFB, AK 99702-2299
Emissions Estimates:
Chemical........................................Lbs/all years
HYDROCHLORIC ACID
(1995 and after ´Acid Aerosols´ Only) ...............360,000
A theory has been presented, using reputable scientific supportive sources, data which is irrefutable in it’s credibility, processes which are accounted for in official budgets, with scientific analytical procedures for review by standard scientific candidates and accredited peers, JUST AS IN ANY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL.
**AS SCIENTIFIC MODELING DEMANDS**,
THIS THEORY STANDS PRESUMED AS CORRECT, and THE OBSERVATIONAL DATA SHOWS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH A PROGRAM IN PROCESS.