Home > ... > Forum 13570

> Conversations on Chemtrails- The truth about what is happening in America

29 March 2005, 18:17

Within this post I have given anyone who wants to know the facts, the SPECIFIC scientific theory, the proposed method with the DETAILS OF IMPLEMENTATION, the means by which to accomplish these goals, the COST ANALYSIS of such undertakings, and the OBSERVED results of increased albeido, all from REPUTABLE, VERIFYABLE sources with links for independent verification. There are many, many more sources, which I could cite, but this shall suffice to prove the theory.
 
If you really want to know what’s happening around you have a good look.
 
Authorized by Congress, or sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, senior researchers, faculty, theoreticians, atmospheric scientists, department heads and CEO’s from a multitude of prestigious institutions. The Smithsonian, Harvard, General Motors, Cambridge, MIT, Yale, World Resources Institute, National Center for Atmospheric Research, the Secretary General of the United Nations, Oxford, Brookings Institution, Columbia University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carnegie-Mellon University, Princeton University, Brown University, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory;
 
A SUMMARY:
In Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Bases conclusion, the N.A.S. (NATIONAL ACADAMY OF SCIENTISTS) found that the most effective global warming mitigation turned out to be the spraying of reflective aerosol compounds into the atmosphere utilizing commercial, military and private aircraft. This preferred mitigation method is designed to create a global atmospheric shield which would increase the planet’s albeido (reflectivity) using aerosol compounds of aluminum and barium oxides, and to introduce ozone generating chemicals into the atmosphere.".
 
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025, A Research Paper Presented To Air Force 2025 by Col Tamzy J. House et al. (August 1996): http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume3/chap15/v3c15-1.htm
 
HERE’S the DATA:
 
A Brief DETAILED OVERVIEW:
UN "AGENDA 21" (AVAILABLE ONLINE AT THE UNITED NATIONS WEBSITE)
 
Complete DETAILS OF THE PRINCIPLE, MATERIALS, PROCEDURE, IMPLEMENTATION, PROPOSED COST AND RAMMIFICATIONS:
1) Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Bases
 
2) Geoengineering: A Climate Change Manhattan Project
http://www.metatronics.net/lit/geo2.html#two (Jay Michaelson, published in the Stanford Environmental Law Journal, January, 1998)
 
US GOVERNMENT’S COST ANALYSIS:
 
GEOENGINEERING PROJECT OBSERVED EFFECT ON THE ALBEIDO:
 
GEOENGINEERING PROJECT OBSERVED EFFECT ON DROUGHT:
Pollution drying up rainfall by Michael Smith, United Press International, Science News (February 17, 2002):
 
Farmers and forecasters fear drought problems looming across Canada, Canadian Press, (February 24, 2002) on Yahoo News: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/020224/6/k002.html
 
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Drought Watch on the Prairies: http://www.agr.gc.ca/pfra/drsites.htm
 
National Drought Mitigation Center (USA) with excellent maps showing drought impact: http://drought.unl.edu/impacts/us/usimpact.htm
 
USDA Drought Information Center: http://drought.fsa.usda.gov/news.htm
 
Rivers down to barest of levels 57 waterways at historic low flows in drought, analysis shows by Traci Watson and Paul Overberg, USA Today, (March 28, 2002): http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/03/28/usat-cover.htm
 
Mayor Declares Drought Emergency for New York, Reuters - Science, (March 26, 2002) on Yahoo News:
 
Prolonged drought drains Montana businesses by Becky Bohrer, Associated Press (April 8, 2002) in Billings Gazette:
 
UN warns of severe water shortages by 2025, Ananova (March 22, 2002): http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_550615.html
 
Barium “specific heat” and drought inducement: http://www.carnicom.com/drought1.htm
 
DYN-O-Gel full patent:
 
HEALTH EFFECTS:
Check any Material Safety Data Sheet and you’ll find barium clearly marked: “DANGER! MAY BE FATAL IF SWALLOWED” with the “Health Rating: 3 - Severe (Life)”.
EPA list of hazardous air pollutants:
Environment Canada:
 
READ two articles on http://globalresistance.worldbreak.com/ entitled:
AEROSOL RADIATIVE FORCING OF CLIMATE
 
OZONE HOLE LEADS TO SPECIAL MEASURES
 
OTHER NOTED PRESTIGEOUS PUBLICATIONS:
www.popularmechanics.com/ science/military/1997/2/weather_wars/
www.defenselink.mil/news/ Jun2000/n06022000_20006025.html
afsafety.af.mil/AFSC/RDBMS/Weapons/ dteam_directed_energy_weapons_safety.htm
library.nps.navy.mil/home/bibs/dewacro.htm
 
KEY SEARCH TERMS:
GEOENGINEERING
"Over The Horizon Radar"
Weather Modification"
"Directed Energy Beam"
"Agenda 21"
 
****************************************
 
Navigate to "Alaska"
Hit the "Identify releases on this map" link.
 
Interestingly, the line item above it lists "Acid Aerosols" - with a weight only 26,000 lbs or so greater than the barium emissions.
 
Now, I don´t want to say that they are lying to the NIH about where they dump the barium (land/air), but since barium seems to be a major ingredient in these aerosol experiments, perhaps there´s a connection.
 
Perhaps Mr. Carnicom could comment on whether the proportions here match the composition of the aerosols he has been studying?
 
Cheers.
 
U.S. AIR FORCE EIELSON AFB AK
EPA Facility Number: 99702LSNRF2258C
2258 CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 100
EIELSON AFB, AK 99702-2299
Emissions Estimates:
 
Chemical........................................Lbs/all years
 
HYDROCHLORIC ACID
(1995 and after ´Acid Aerosols´ Only) ...............360,000
 
BARIUM................................................334,364
 
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE...................85,027
 
MANGANESE........................................47,095
 
LEAD...........................................................1,528
 
Other chemicals: .........................................49
 
TOTAL: ........................................... 828,063 lbs
 
A theory has been presented, using reputable scientific supportive sources, data which is irrefutable in it’s credibility, processes which are accounted for in official budgets, with scientific analytical procedures for review by standard scientific candidates and accredited peers, JUST AS IN ANY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL.
 
**AS SCIENTIFIC MODELING DEMANDS**,
 
THIS THEORY STANDS PRESUMED AS CORRECT, and THE OBSERVATIONAL DATA SHOWS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH A PROGRAM IN PROCESS.