> Massive "End the Occupation" Protest in Baghdad Dwarfs the "Saddam Toppled" rally: Photos
13 April 2005, 23:39
"our response to 9/11 isn’t about killing those responsible for 9/11. That would be like going to japan in wwii and seeking out those respoinsible for pearl harbor without realizing there is a whole country devoted to continuing to attack the US."
The logic of this entirely escapes me, and suggests a serious convolution of facts. Japan DID attack us at Pearl Harbor. Not ONE Iraqi attacked us on 9/11. Indeed, Saddam Hussein despised Bin Laden, as anyone who studied the situation knows. The vast majority of Iraqis had no designs on the USA. The logic of this statement is so bizarre, and so contrary to facts, that there must be some propoganda that the writer accepts as truth, and therefore continues to support the war against the people of Iraq.
There were no WMDs, and Hans Blix stated that before the war. The Iraqis are worse off than before the war, and the world is a MUCH more dangerous place.
"our response to 9/11 isn’t about killing those responsible for 9/11. That would be like going to japan in wwii and seeking out those respoinsible for pearl harbor without realizing there is a whole country devoted to continuing to attack the US."
The logic of this entirely escapes me, and suggests a serious convolution of facts. Japan DID attack us at Pearl Harbor. Not ONE Iraqi attacked us on 9/11. Indeed, Saddam Hussein despised Bin Laden, as anyone who studied the situation knows. The vast majority of Iraqis had no designs on the USA. The logic of this statement is so bizarre, and so contrary to facts, that there must be some propoganda that the writer accepts as truth, and therefore continues to support the war against the people of Iraq.
There were no WMDs, and Hans Blix stated that before the war. The Iraqis are worse off than before the war, and the world is a MUCH more dangerous place.