London Underground Exercises and the Magically Exploding Terrorists: Important Questions

London Underground Exercises and the
Magically Exploding Terrorists: Important Questions
Official government story changes every minute
Paul Joseph
Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet | July 13 2005

Since we posted our original
article about the exercises being conducted on the London
Underground which targeted the exact same spots as the bombings that
happened on the morning of Thursday 7th July, a firestorm of interest
on the subject has swept the internet.

Important questions need to be asked of both Peter
Power and Visor Consultants, the agency who were running the drill.

In both the
ITN TV interview and the
BBC radio interview Peter Power makes it clear
that the team of crisis managers who were overseeing the drill quickly
switched from exercise planning to real time management of the actual
bombing itself.

"We had to suddenly switch an exercise from
fictional to real," stated Power in his TV interview.

The company that Visor were running the exercise
for is not named by Power. If Visor switched to real time management
of the bombings, who else could the company be but London Underground
or one of their affiliates?

If this were a strategy session for a completely
unaffiliated company to London Underground, the meeting would have been
cancelled and the participants would have gone home as soon as they
were aware of the fact that a real attack was taking place.

Only if the exercise was being conducted for London
Underground or a group responsible for part of a command structure in
the aftermath of the attack would ’real time crisis management’ of the
event take place.

So why does Power make mention of the company being
close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen? He then makes reference
to American banks. If the exercise was being coordinated on behalf of
a bank then why was there a need for Visor Consultants to actively ’manage’
the bombings after they had taken place and what were they managing
precisely?

Visor Consultants is a PR firm. Were they responsible
for telling the media that the bombings were in fact a simple power
surge for over an hour? An explanation that was obviously ridiculous
but gave the government time to manage the release of information about
the attack.

Power has been hired by the government before and
he is always used to release information after terrorist incidents in
London.

Two previous examples of this are the March 2001
BBC television
center bombing and the September 2000 rocket
attack on the MI6 building.

Was Powers again used by the government as a conduit
for information that would support their official version of events?

Today we are told that the bombers were all killed
in the act of carrying out the bombing. Just like the Madrid bombers
blew
themselves up during a raid (pictured below).

How very convenient that all of the suspected patsies
should have been blown up in their own attacks even though the last
word was that the attacks were not suicide bombings, but synchronized,
timed bombings. This is pure media-manipulation sleight
of hand. Its designed to distract from the revelation that exercises
that precisely mirrored the bombings were happening in the Tube as the bombs were going off around London. Its the same trick used in Madrid - first the government tried to blame ETA and when that wouldn’t stick,
it turned to the old standby of Islamic Extremists. When investigators
tracked the patsies to an apartment in Leganés, the so-called
terrorists supposedly blew themselves up in the stand-off. Suspects
dead, case closed the government said. They are trying to play the same
tired hand in London.

The BBC is reporting
that only one of the bombers definitely blew himself up. Which is it?
All four bombers or just one? There is an attempt to muddy the waters
so people will switch off and just buy whatever the government tells
them, even though the government story keeps contradicting itself.

The London
Times reported,

"The bombers who killed 191 people in Madrid
last year also gathered at one place before separating to plant devices
timed to explode simultaneously."

How could the Madrid bombers have carried out an
attack from the grave? Here
is the report saying they blew themselves up. How could
they have bombed London if they were already dead? When another city
gets bombed and they get blamed again will anyone point out that the
same bombers have now been killed twice over?

The Times report is a blatant psy-op to keep the
’Al-Qaeda’ drumbeat echoing in people’s heads. Even though the so-called
claim of responsibility is a proven
hoax.

Furthermore, the
New Zealand Herald reported that two Reuters employees
witnessed the unconfirmed shooting by police of two apparent suicide
bombers outside the HSBC tower at Canary Wharf in London. This took
place at 10:30am, after the so-called suicide bombers had blown themselves
up.

So let me get this straight, they blew themselves
up after the Madrid bombing, they blew themselves up during the London
bombing and then they were shot by police after the London bombing.
So they’ve been killed three times over? Does that make sense to you?

Add to this that the CCTV camera on the number 30
bus was conveniently not working and we have the makings of an information
lock down. They can tell us whatever they want but without any evidence
to back it up why should we believe them when they’ve been caught lying
about terrorism and creating fake terror alerts dozens of times before?

Related:
London Underground Bombing ’Exercises’ Took Place at Same Time as Real
Attack

Related:
London Bombing Archive

– http://www.propagandamatrix.com/art...