The birth of the London bomb Official Story

You can practically hear the click at that moment in the life of every conspiracy
when the police investigation turns into the Official Story. At that point,
the investigation is intended to ’fix the facts’ to the Official Story, and
the cover-up begins. The story
of the London
bombs has made this transformation within the last twenty-four hours. The authorities
thought it was small bombs with
timers
or triggered by cell phones and almost certainly not
a suicide bomb attack; now they claim with certainty that the bombs were accompanied
by handlers, some or all of whom may have died in the blasts, possibly by accident
and probably intentionally (which means they were suicide
bombers, as it is extremely unlikely that all four made a mistake). The original
story was that it was an international al Qaeda operation; now it is British
Muslims. In just a day or two, everything has changed.

The British government has managed to fashion the least damaging story possible
under the circumstances. Cell-phone triggered bombs are out, as that might lead
to calls for cell-phone jammers near transportation routes, a prospect that
would cost rich people who own cell-phone companies money. Small bags with explosives
and timers are out, as that is just too scary. The prospect of an unlimited
quantity of small bombs was causing too much panic. Suicide bombers are in,
as it will be thought that the likelihood of there being a lot of available
suicide bombers is small, and thus the level of concern can be reduced in the
general population. Of course, there will still be enough tension to lead to
more video cameras and more call for national ID cards and increased police
powers. International al Qaeda is out, as it brings up too many associations
of how Blair’s alliance with Bush in Iraq put the British people in direct danger
(but watch for the ’mastermind’ to eventually be connected to the governments
of Syria or Iran). Any connection between British government wrong-doing and
terrorism must be broken. Local Muslims are in, as there appears to be a new
campaign to demonize British Muslims as part of the ongoing Zionist program
to associate terrorism with calls for the Islamification of British society.
This fits in with the general idea that terrorists are Evil and have impossible
demands which can’t possibly be met, and thus terrorism has to be fought with
the ’war on terror’, and not with negotiations and concessions. All these wars
suit Israel and the arms dealers. For that reason, British Muslims are going
to be in for a difficult
time, and the ’Londonistan’
meme is the start of that process.

Just a few early questions:

1. Why would suicide bombers need timers? Are we to believe that all four of
   them died when they mistakenly set off their bombs?


2. Why would suicide bombers carry identification which would lead the authorities
   directly to their colleagues? How did it survive in at least three of the
   bombs? I am reminded of the convenient passport found at the World Trade Center.


3. If all four video cameras on the bus were not
   working, how do the police know what happened on the bus? The witness
   who saw someone fiddling with a bag just begs the question of whether the
   fiddler was a bomber. Why do video cameras on buses need to be switched on
   by the drivers?


4. Why did Jack Straw state
   so quickly that it was al Qaeda? Is the theory that it is still al Qaeda,
   or some other group?


5. How did the British know to warn Netanyahu so quickly? If they knew enough
   to warn Netanyahu, why didn’t they have enough time to shut down the subway
   system? Or did
   they?


6. Why was the transportation system still operating when the bus bomb went
   off, nearly an hour later
   than the subway bombs? One theory is that the last bomber got on the bus after
   the subway system was closed!


7. How easy would it be to pay some Muslim British men, who are told to carry
   identification, to drive to London and sit in specific places on specific
   subway trains or buses? When the bombs go off and the identification is found,
   you have instant patsies, and British Muslims in the frame. The fact they
   were seen together
   on video footage then becomes just part of the set-up. With so many known
   video cameras in London, why wouldn’t they take care not to be seen together?
   They could have entered London separately if they did not want to be identified
   as part of a ’cell’, and avoid giving the police information that could be
   used to trace their colleagues. As is often the case with these stories, we
   are asked to believe that they would be technically proficient (’military
   grade’ explosives), but make the dumbest small mistakes.


8. What happened to the story, out of Canada and New Zealand, that the police
   shot one or two men near Canary Wharf?

The bombers are all dead, and dead men tell no tales. They were kind enough
to leave enough identification, and enough video footage, to tie them to British
Muslim colleagues. Once the ’cell’ is broken everybody can rest easy, with no
more inconvenient questions about the sanity of the ’war on terror’ or the fact
that Blair’s lies led to the attack. Nothing to see here; please move along
(oh, and may I see your ID card please?).
– http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2005/0...