Le site Bellaciao: coloré, multiple, ou le meilleur cotoie fort heureusement le pire, mélangé, bizarre, picabien et dadaîste, explorant toutes sortes de registres et de régimes rhétoriques, drole et polémiqueur, surréaliste: rencontre d'un parapluie et d'une machine à coudre sur une table de dissection, têtes de Lénine sur le clavier d'un piano Steinway ou Bosendorfer...
FR
ES
Senal en Vivo
VIDEO
RADIO
FRIENDS SITES
with Bellaciao
Bellaciao hosted by
To rebel is right, to disobey is a duty, to act is necessary !
Bellaciao  mobile version   |   Home  |   About us   |   Donation  |   Links  |   Contact  |   Search
2010 Elections in pro-war UK and Apartheid Australia: Put Labour Last in UK, Put Labor Last in Australia

by : Dr Gideon Polya
Saturday March 27, 2010 - 04:19
1 comment

2010 is an Election Year in both the UK and Australia and hence a crucial year for both the British Labour Party Government of the UK and the Australian Labor Party Federal Government of Australia (note the difference in spelling: “Labour” by the British and “Labor” by the Australians).

The big question for decent, anti-racist, anti-war folk in both the UK and Australian Murdochracies (the Murdoch Empire is the ultimate king-maker in these electoral charades) is whether they should prefer, in practice, an extreme right wing, pro-war, anti-environment Conservative Government or an extreme right wing, pro-war, anti-environment Labour (Labor) government?

My considered position is that we should “Put Labour Last” in the UK and “Put Labor Last” in Apartheid Australia as outlined below.

UK Elections.

Most importantly, the UK electoral system is “first past the post” - whichever candidate (Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat, Socialist or Independent) gets the largest number of votes wins the seat in the House of Commons and whichever party or coalition of parties gets a majority in the House of Commons gets to form the Government.

For decent, anti-war, anti-racist, pro-environment, humanitarian Britons the choice is simple. As stated by Liberal Democrat Leader Nick Clegg commenting on Gordon Brown’s appearance before the Chilcot Inquiry on the Iraq War: “This was the day Gordon Brown finally had to come clean and admit that he believes the Iraq war was right. We now know we were betrayed by Gordon Brown and we were betrayed by the Labour Party. How can we trust a man who still believes that this illegal war and all the horror it has caused was right? When the Liberal Democrats were the only party to oppose this immoral invasion we didn’t just speak for us, we spoke for the nation.” (see Liberal Democrats, “Brown’s Iraq admission shows he cannot be trusted says Clegg”, 5 March 2010”: http://www.libdems.org.uk/press_rel... ).

Further, pro-Zionist, pro-war, war criminal neocon British Labour is actually worse than the pro-Zionist, pro-war, war criminal neocon British Conservatives of whom it could be generously said: “God forgive them for they know not what they do” , After all the genocidal, racist Tories have been invading , occupying, devastating and mass murdering the inhabitants of other countries for over 3 centuries - that’s what racist, genocidal conservatives DO and they simply don’t know any better.

Labour, on the other hand, does know better but deliberately refashioned itself this century in the image of George W. Bush’s Racist Religious Right Republicans (R4s).

Unlike the many Germans who declared in 1945 that “we didn’t know”, Labour knew all too well what is it was doing when it invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. Accordingly decent Brits should obviously vote #1 Liberal Democrat (or better still, Socialist) and at the very least “Put Labor Last”.

Ideally decent Brits should demand, like the late Harold Pinter, that the Labour war criminals be arraigned as war criminals (post-invasion violent and non-violent excess deaths in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories total 2.5 million and 4.5 million, respectively) (see "Muslim Holocaust, Muslim Genocide": http://sites.google.com/site/muslim... ).

Australian elections.

Unlike the UK, Australia has a preferential voting system – the voter has to number all the candidates for a seat in the House of Representatives in descending order of preference down from 1 (highest preference). If one candidate fails to get an absolute majority of over 50% of the votes, the second, third etc preferences are successively distributed starting with those supporting the least popular party.

Thus, for example, if the Liberal Party or National Party candidate of the so-called Coalition gained 45%, the Australian Labor Party (ALP) gained 45% and the Australian Greens gained 10% of the vote, then the Labor candidate would win if more than 50% of the Greens preferences favoured Labor – and indeed that was a significant reason for the Labor victory in the 2007 Federal elections under Kevin Rudd (now known as KRudd for his pro-coal policies).

However, after over 2 years of Labor inaction over man-made climate change Australian Greens voters and indeed many Labor voters are angry at their betrayal over climate change by the pro-coal Rudd Labor Australian Federal Government.

Indeed I believe that “who to put last” in the 2010 Australian Federal elections (extreme right wing Liberal-National Party Coalition Opposition or extreme right wing Labor Government, collectively known as the Lib-Labs) is THE big question for all thoughtful pro-environment, pro-Planet Australians in 2010.

I argue quantitatively “by the numbers” and qualitatively take my cue from top scientists (I have just entered my 5th decade as an academic teacher but my biggest lesson as a research scientist has been humility and respect for the wisdom of outstanding scientists, outstanding scientific organizations and outstanding scientific journals).

Furthermore, I door-knocked for Labor Leader Mr Whitlam in 1975, was a member of the Australian Labor Party (ALP) until it became a right wing, “All the way with the USA” “Another Liberal Party” shortly after the US-backed 1975 Coup, and have voted Labor all my life (I started voting Green in the Senate several elections ago and last election gave Labor my second preference after giving the Greens #1 in the Australian preferential voting system because it was apparent that 21st century Labor was an extreme right wing, pro-war, war criminal, Indigenous Human Rights-violating, pro-coal, climate criminal, ecocidal, ethnocidal, genocidal, and terracidal “Another Liberal Party” and indeed well to the right of the ultra-conservative Australian Liberal Party under Malcolm Fraser back in 1975).

There are 3 key climate policies advocated by top climate scientists, specifically:

1. no ETS (condemned as empirically unsuccessful, counterproductive and indeed fraudulent; for what top climate scientists and economist say against the ETS see: http://sites.google.com/site/yarrav... );

2. Direct Action on renewable energy, reforestation and biochar ASAP and cessation of GHG pollution ASAP to get atmospheric CO2 back to about 300 ppm ( for what top scientists say in support of this policy see: http://sites.google.com/site/300org... );

3. an accurate Carbon Price ASAP ($200 per tonne of carbon based solely on the risk-avoidance-based $50 billion cost of the 5,000 Australians who die from the effects of coal burning pollutants each year – as compared to Labor’s pathetic $10/tonne of carbon : http://sites.google.com/site/yarrav...).

How do the key parties score on this? The Australian Greens score 3/3, the Coalition scores 1/3 (generously 2/3 if their Direct Action really gets going) and pro-coal, climate criminal Labor scores 0/3.

“Reason” informed by the numbers and top scientists says that we are morally obliged to vote #1 Green and (as difficult as this is for longstanding Labor voters such as myself) Put Labor Last or as summarized by the acronym APPALL , Australian People Put Apartheid Labor Last.

The key arguments for this action to help save the Planet for out grandchildren are (1) the key strategy (as enunciated by one of Australia’s top Bridge and Corporate Business strategists) is that you must punish the incompetent incumbent and (2) it is not sensible to vote for a Labor Party that consistently betrays its own supporters.

Of course there are many other profound reasons why decent, anti-racist, pro-environment humanitarians can no longer even give Australian Labor a #2 preference.

Indeed in addition to Labor’s terracidal, climate criminal and climate genocidal policies (see: http://sites.google.com/site/climat... ) , there are some further major issues of Labor involvement in racism, theft and mass murder that are “lines in the sand” for decent folk like me – even giving Labor #2 preference after the Greens would be like spitting on my martyred relatives (only a dozen of whom to my knowledge survived Nazi-occupied Europe) e.g.

1. “Thou shalt not kill children”. Under Labor we are allied to cowardly mass paedocide and mass murderer Obama who kills an estimated 1,000 children EACH DAY in the overseas American Empire (see “Hey, hey, USA, how many kids did you kill today? Answer: 1,000”: http://bellaciao.org/en/spip.php?ar... ). The “annual death rate” is 7% for under-5 year old infants in Labor Australia-occupied Afghanistan as compared to 4% for Poles under the Nazis in WW2 or 5% for French Jews under the Nazis in WW2 (see “Polish Holocaust (1939-1945) & Afghan Holocaust (2001-) ”: http://gpolya.polls.newsvine.com/_n... ). Indeed Labor climate criminal policies are predicted to mean the avoidable death of 6 billion under-5 year old non-European infants this century (see” Climate Genocide”: http://sites.google.com/site/climat... ).

2. “Thou shalt not steal”. In particular people should not steal the Home, Land and indeed Country of others whether they be Jewish Hungarians (e.g. my variously butchered, exiled and dispossessed family), Indigenous Australians (currently being dispossessed by Apartheid Labor) or Indigenous Palestinians, Iraqi, Afghans, Somalis, Syrians, Lebanese and NW Pakistan Pashtuns. Thus outstanding Jewish American scholar Professor Jared Diamond who in his best-selling book "Collapse” (Prologue, p10, Penguin edition) enunciated the "moral principle, namely that it is morally wrong for one people to dispossess, subjugate, or exterminate another people" – an injunction grossly violated by the racist, genocide-committing and genocide-ignoring US Alliance, including the Apartheid Labor Party. KRudd has done one useful thing in his life and that has been to introduce the word “scum” into polite public discourse in describing those “people smugglers” who try to find safe haven for desperate refugees.- this raising the question of how then do you described those (including Apartheid Labor) who have been complicit in the generation of 20 million Muslim refugees (the breakdown being 7 million Palestinians, 5-6 million Iraqis, 3-4 million Afghans and 2.5 million NW Pakistan Pashtuns under war criminal Obama) (for details see “Muslim Holocaust, Muslim Genocide”: http://sites.google.com/site/muslim... ).

3. “Thou shalt not lie”. Further, one should not “slie” (a slie being a spin-based untruth of the kind beloved of major neocon parties in the politically correst racist (PC racist), democratic Nazi Western Murdochracies). Lying and slying simply short-circuits rational risk management that successively involves (a) accurate data , (b) scientific analysis and (c) systemic change to minimize risk. Rational risk management is all the more vital today as we face a worsening Climate Emergency and Climate Crisis. The Labor Government is committed to slying and lying by omission and commission Thus it continues to falsely state that “LNG is clean energy” (it isn’t – take it from me as a half century scientific career biological chemistry research scientist and 4 decade academic teacher than methane, CH4, generates more CO2 per unit weight than the burning of brown coal - roughly 2.8 tonnes CO2/tonne CH4 and 1.3 tonnes CO2 per tonne brown coal; see “Correcting the Australian Government - natural gas is NOT “clean energy””: http://www.openforum.com.au/natural... ).

4. “Zero tolerance for racism” . For anti-racist Jews and indeed all anti-racist humanitarians the core moral messages from the Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million dead, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation) and from the more general WW2 European Holocaust (30 million Slav, Jewish and Gypsy dead) are “zero tolerance for racism”, “never again to anyone”, “bear witness” and “zero tolerance for lying” – sacred injunctions grossly violated by racist Apartheid Labor which is anti-Arab anti-Semitic (mass murder of Arabs and culturally Semitic Muslims) and also egregiously anti-Jewish anti-Semitic (false identification of all Jews with the crimes of Apartheid Israel and the pro-Zionist US Alliance) and which has also supported the race-based exclusion of Northern Territory Indigenous Australians from Labor Leader Mr Whitlam’s 1975 Racial Discrimination Act. As an an anti-racist Australian I am not waiting for racist Apartheid Labor to extend this to Jews, Armenians, Zoroastrians … or whoever. Voting for racist, war criminal Labour in the UK or even giving a second preference vote to Apartheid Labor in preferential voting in Australia is in my book what the Catholics call a “mortal sin”.

5. “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel” (Samuel Johnson, 7 April 1775) but responsible folk must support the security and well-being of their family, town, city and nation. Unfortunately Apartheid Labor has turned a blind eye to 50 ways in which a particular nuclear terrorist rogue state, racist Zionist-run Apartheid Israel, violates our border security, our laws and our reputation. Indeed Apartheid Labor has just signed a $349 million defence contract with Apartheid Israel, effectively allowing this rogue state of Apartheid Israel (a racist state with an appalling record of grossly violating the sovereignty of many European and non-European countries) into the heart of Australia’s security and border protection (see: http://bellaciao.org/en/spip.php?ar... and http://sites.google.com/site/palest... ) i.e. Apartheid Labor places the interests of this racist, nuclear terrorist, Australia-violating rogue state of Apartheid Israel before the interests and security of Australians.

Of course one can argue that the Libs are actually worse than the Labs – but then in a spirit of brotherly generosity one must consider the counter-argument that for the Libs “God forgive them for they know not what they do” whereas pro-war, racist, anti-environment Apartheid Labor is deliberately and knowingly turning the anti-war, anti-racism and pro-environment policies of the 1960s and 1970s Whitlam Labor Party on its head.

And of course on the 3 key climate change policies the Greens score 3/3, the Coalition scores 1/3 (as a scientist and an academic I am encouraging them with facts and figures to score better) and climate criminal Apartheid Labor scores 0/3.

Summary.

Pro-war, war criminal, pro-Business-As-Usual (BAU), anti-environment, climate criminal, pro-Zionist, anti-Arab anti-Semitic and anti-Jewish anti-Semitic Labour (Labor) in the UK and Australia should be returned to the Opposition benches, even if this means getting pro-war, war criminal, pro-Business-As-Usual (BAU), anti-environment, climate criminal, pro-Zionist, anti-Arab anti-Semitic and anti-Jewish anti-Semitic Conservative Governments. Put Labour Last in the UK and Put Labor Last in Apartheid Australia.



Leave a comment
Print this article


Commentaires de l'article
 

2010 Elections in pro-war UK and Apartheid Australia: Put Labour Last in UK, Put Labor Last in Australia
Sunday April 4 - 08:45 - Posted by new illuminati - 8793406bb2dd04fc...

Unfortunately, in the ludicrous false two party ’democracies’ fostered by the Westminster System there’s only a choice of the lesser of two evils, and the realpolitik of the situation is that the so-called conservative oppositions are actually far worse, owned lock stock and barrel by the most deplorable polluters.
In this milieu it’s far better to vote for third parties like the Greens, who rarely have enough clout to make a real difference.
See http://newilluminati.blog-city.com/...
and keep posting this great information!







PEOPLE OF COLOR: THE NFL DOESN’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOU
Tuesday 17 - 23:07
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
TRUMP, JONES, THE NFL, AND THE NEW MCCARTHYISM
Tuesday 10 - 23:14
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Catalonia referendum: 90% voted for independence, say officials (video)
Monday 2 - 09:55
Catalonia referendum: ’Spanish authorities are the criminals’ (video)
Monday 2 - 09:47
If I was truly evil
Tuesday 12 - 14:22
Yves Bouvier Faces Swiss Tax Investigation
Saturday 9 - 03:27
by lishk
The Polisario front suspected of double-play around humanitarian aid hijacking
Friday 8 - 21:44
by NathanT
The Polisario front suspected of double-play around humanitarian aid hijacking
Friday 8 - 21:37
by Nathan Taylor
AMERICA’S JUDASES
Sunday 27 - 20:02
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
What happend to Soraya and Hussein Khashoggi?
Friday 25 - 20:38
by Perseus
The falling Max Ehrich
Thursday 17 - 19:40
by celbbetty
DAMN THE NFL
Wednesday 16 - 01:44
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Overplaying your hand
Thursday 10 - 12:36
Gujarat Flood 2017 Devastation- Inevitable or Orchestrated in Dhanera ?
Thursday 3 - 06:19
by Dwarika Nath Rath
Multiple citizenship & Zionist subversion of America, Australia, India, Humanity
Wednesday 2 - 03:10
by Dr Gideon Polya
I’M AN IDIOT AND I VOTE
Thursday 27 - 23:23
by David R. Hoffman
The Top Ten Art Scandals That Have Rocked the World
Tuesday 18 - 15:48
by Curtis Judge
John Pilger slams Mainstream silence re Apartheid Israel crimes: Free Palestine
Thursday 13 - 02:43
by Dr Gideon Polya
RUSSIAN MAFIA – NOW IN DUBAI?
Monday 3 - 14:52
by James Dolay
THE NFL IS RACIST
Saturday 1 - 00:31
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Australian Finkel Review has dirty energy for 50 years & ignores 25 key issues
Monday 19 - 03:37
by Dr Gideon Polya
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: JUSTICE FOR PHILANDO CASTILE
Sunday 18 - 01:03
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Find out what is true and false about climate change - Kenneth Pouchet
Friday 16 - 17:43
by Kenneth Pouchet
Freedom For Me, But Not You
Wednesday 31 - 02:17
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Post-Apartheid, non-racist, One State, democratic Palestine can happen tomorrow
Tuesday 30 - 08:21
by Dr Gideon Polya
A Review of Gilad Atzmon’s new book, “Being In Time: The Post-Political Manifes
Wednesday 17 - 21:23
by June Terpstra
Avoiding Another War in North Korea
Sunday 14 - 18:27
by William John Cox
Judah Ben Hur for President 2020
Saturday 13 - 16:15
by William Morgan
ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FOR DONALD J. TRUMP
Saturday 13 - 02:33
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
As War Party shadow boxes, its agenda surges unopposed
Friday 12 - 14:28
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Yves Bouvier caught in a real estate bankruptcy
Thursday 11 - 20:19
by Pierre Gove
Book: This Is How The State Fucks Your Mind
Tuesday 9 - 19:16
by OAF
ISRAEL’S 1967 ATTACK ON INTELLIGENCE SHIP U.S.S. LIBERTY - THE ONLY MYSTERY
Thursday 20 - 20:06
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Denmark eaten down to the bone, what’s next?
Wednesday 19 - 16:22
by Henrik Petersen
A Financial Toll Tax: Transform, Not Reform, the U.S. Tax System
Monday 17 - 22:55
by William John Cox
COMPLETE DEGRADATION OF A SELF-STYLED GREAT NATION
Saturday 8 - 16:35
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
ATTACKING PEOPLE WITH FLEETS OF MISSILES BEFORE YOU HAVE ANY FACTS
Friday 7 - 20:34
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Syrian rebels used Sarin nerve gas, not Assad’s regime: U.N. official
Thursday 6 - 23:09
by Shaun Waterman
TRUMP’S FRIGHTENING TURNAROUND ON SYRIA – A STRONG SIGNAL ABOUT WHO REALLY RUNS
Thursday 6 - 17:22
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
AMERICA’S POLITICS WITHOUT MEANING - THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE COUNTRY
Thursday 30 - 17:37
by JOHN CHUCKMAN

home | webmaster



Follow-up of the site's activity
RSS Bellaciao En


rss FR / rss IT / rss ES



Bellaciao hosted by DRI

It is the responsibility of the intellectual to speak the truth and to expose lies. Noam Chomsky
Facebook Twitter Google+
DAZIBAO
I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name
Thursday 10 March
©Olivier Jobard/Myop I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM IS A RIGHT In the phrase « right to asylum », every word matters. Under the law, every person who is persecuted because of his or her political opinions or because of his or her identity, every person that is endangered by violence, war or misery has a RIGHT to seek asylum in another country The aim of this petition is to collect (...)
read more...
Neo-Nazis and far-right protesters in Ukraine 3 live-stream
Friday 24 January
2 comments
The far-right in Ukraine are acting as the vanguard of a protest movement that is being reported as pro-democracy. The situation on the ground is not as simple as pro-EU and trade versus pro-Putin and Russian hegemony in the region. When US Senator John McCain dined with Ukraine’s opposition leaders in December, he shared a table and later a stage with the leader of the extreme far-right Svoboda party Oleh Tyahnybok. This is Oleh Tyahnybok, he has claimed a "Moscow-Jewish mafia" (...)
read more...
Hugo Chavez is dead (video live)
Wednesday 6 March
by : Collective BELLACIAO
1 comment
President Hugo Chavez companeros venezueliano died after a long battle with cancer.
read more...
International initiative to stop the war in Syria Yes to democracy, no to foreign intervention!
Thursday 13 December
Your support here: http://www.peaceinsyria.org/support.php We, the undersigned, who are part of an international civil society increasingly worried about the awful bloodshed of the Syrian people, are supporting a political initiative based on the results of a fact-finding mission which some of our colleagues undertook to Beirut and Damascus in September 2012. This initiative consists in calling for a delegation of highranking personalities and public figures to go to Syria in order to (...)
read more...
THE KU KLUX KLAN ONCE AGAIN CONTROLS INDIANA
Monday 12 November
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
7 comments
At first glance, the results of America’s 2012 election appear to be a triumph for social, racial, and economic justice and progress in the United States: California voters passed a proposition requiring the rich to shoulder their fair share of the tax burden; Two states, Colorado and Washington, legalized the recreational use of marijuana, while Massachusetts approved the use of marijuana for medical purposes; Washington and two other states, Maine and Maryland, legalized same-sex (...)
read more...
I’VE DECIDED TO "WASTE" MY VOTE
Sunday 28 October
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
In a 2004 episode of Comedy Central’s animated series South Park, an election was held to determine whether the new mascot for the town’s elementary school would be a “giant douche” or a “turd sandwich.” Confronted with these two equally unpalatable choices, one child, Stan Marsh, refused to vote at all, which resulted in his ostracization and subsequent banishment from the town. Although this satirical vulgarity was intended as a commentary on the two (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART IV
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART III If there is one major inconsistency in life, it is that young people who know little more than family, friends and school are suddenly, at the age of eighteen, supposed to decide what they want to do for the rest of their lives. Unfortunately, because of their limited life experiences, the illusions they have about certain occupations do not always comport to the realities. I discovered this the first time I went to college. About a year into my studies, I (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART III
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART IV Disillusioned with the machinations of so-called “traditional” colleges, I became an adjunct instructor at several “for-profit” colleges. Thanks largely to the power and pervasiveness of the Internet, “for-profit” colleges (hereinafter for-profits) have become a growing phenomenon in America. They have also been the subject of much political debate and the focus of a Frontline special entitled College Inc. Unlike traditional (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART II
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART III PART IV Several years ago, a young lady came into the college where I was teaching to inquire about a full-time instructor’s position in the sociology department. She was advised that only adjunct positions were available. Her response was, “No thanks. Once an adjunct, always an adjunct.” Her words still echo in my mind. Even as colleges and universities raise their tuition costs, they are relying more and more on adjunct instructors. Adjuncts are (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART I
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART II PART III PART IV When The Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution over two hundred years ago, Americans were blessed with many rights considered to be “fundamental.” One conspicuously missing, however, was the right to an education. This was not surprising given the tenor of the times. America was primarily an agrarian culture, and education, especially higher education, was viewed as a privilege reserved for the children of the rich and (...)
read more...
ONE SOLITARY LIFE, PART TWO
Monday 30 July
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
3 comments
If there is one universal question that haunts all human beings at some point in their lives, it is, “Why do we die?” Death, after all, is the great illogic. It ultimately claims all, the rich and the poor, the mighty and the small, the good and the evil. Death also has the capability to make most human pursuits—such as the quest for wealth, fame and power—vacuous and fleeting. Given this reality, I have often wondered why so many people are still willing to (...)
read more...
HOW MUCH CORRUPTION CAN DEMOCRACY ENDURE?
Thursday 28 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
6 comments
How much corruption can a “democracy” endure before it ceases to be a democracy? If five venal, mendacious, duplicitous, amoral, biased and (dare I say it) satanic Supreme Court “justices”—John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy—have their way, America will soon find out. In several previous articles for Pravda.Ru, I have consistently warned how the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision is one of the (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS, PART TWO
Tuesday 12 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
1 comment
Imagine, if you will, that the United States government passes a law banning advertisers from sponsoring commercials on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show or Rupert Murdoch’s Fox (Faux) “News” Network. On one hand, there would be two decided advantages to this ban: The National IQ would undoubtedly increase several percentage points, and manipulative pseudo-journalists would no longer be able to appeal to the basest instincts in human nature for ratings and profit while (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS
Thursday 7 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Pravda.Ru Legal Editor
4 comments
LIVE, from the State that brought you Senator Joseph McCarthy, Wisconsin voters now proudly present, fresh from his recall election victory, Governor Scott Walker! At first glance, it is almost unfathomable that anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have voted to retain Scott Walker as Wisconsin’s governor. This, after all, is a man who openly declared he is trying to destroy the rights of workers through a “divide and conquer” strategy; who received 61% of the (...)
read more...
PEOPLE WITHOUT SOULS
Tuesday 13 March
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
2 comments
A question I’ve frequently been asked since I began writing for Pravda.Ru in 2003 is, “Why did you become disillusioned with the practice of law?” This question is understandable, particularly since, in most people’s minds, being an attorney is synonymous with wealth and political power. I’ve always been reluctant to answer this question for fear it will discourage conscientious and ethical people from pursuing careers in the legal profession—a (...)
read more...