Le site Bellaciao: coloré, multiple, ou le meilleur cotoie fort heureusement le pire, mélangé, bizarre, picabien et dadaîste, explorant toutes sortes de registres et de régimes rhétoriques, drole et polémiqueur, surréaliste: rencontre d'un parapluie et d'une machine à coudre sur une table de dissection, têtes de Lénine sur le clavier d'un piano Steinway ou Bosendorfer...
Senal en Vivo
with Bellaciao
Bellaciao hosted by
To rebel is right, to disobey is a duty, to act is necessary !
Bellaciao  mobile version   |   Home  |   About us   |   Donation  |   Links  |   Contact  |   Search
Why the World Hates the US

by : Ted Rall
Thursday May 26, 2005 - 12:31

Liberals have their faults, but no one can accuse them of being pigheaded. Two years after left-of-Bush Americans marched against the invasion of Iraq and a year after the Administration admitted it had lied about Saddam’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction and ties to Al Qaeda, the sprouting of a few protodemocratic weeds in the microscopically-cracked cement of Arab dictatorship has prompted them to wonder whether the neoconservatives maybe did the right thing after all by going into Iraq.

"[Bush] may have had it right," NPR’s Daniel Schorr writes in the Christian Science Monitor. Even Harry Reid, the Democrats’ fiery-as-these-things-go leader in the Senate, is swooning over the image of flag-waving Lebanese demanding a Syrian withdrawal: "Any breakthrough we get there, whether it is in Lebanon or Egypt, is a step in the right direction and I support the president in that regard."

As far as I’m concerned, Bush deserves to be impeached for lying to his employers—us—about Iraq’s WMDs. He should face prosecution at a war crimes tribunal for the murder of the 100,000-plus Iraqis he ordered killed by U.S. troops. He deserves life in prison for ordering the torture, and allowing the murder under torture, of countless innocent Afghans and Iraqis. Nothing, not even if the Iraq war sparked the transformation of the entire Muslim world into peaceful and prosperous Athenian-style democracies, could retroactively justify such murderous perfidy. I’m not convinced a Riyadh spring is about to bloom. It will take a lot more than male-only Saudi municipal elections held in half the country, in which six of the seven winners were illegally promoted by the kingdom’s extremist Wahabbi religious establishment.

Take courage, wobbly self-doubters! Even taking recent events into account, your "no blood for oil" signs will come in handy during the America-hating years ahead.

Never mind the dead, the lies or the cash, say the connies. As Britain’s John Maples, originally a Bush supporter of the Iraq war, wrote: "The real reason for the war, at least in the U.S., was to create a reasonably democratic, free market Iraq to act as both a beacon and a rebuke to other countries in the region." The Project for a New American Century, the neocon think tank that started Cheney, Rumsfeld & Co. along the charred road to American Empire, stated in 1997 that U.S foreign policy leaders should strive "to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests [around the world]." Iraq was the first big test of their approach.

It may be premature to judge Bush’s frat pack by their own standards but it’s also fair. They’ve already declared victory. Ross Terrill, whose editor at The Weekly Standard signed the 1997 PNAC statement of purpose, writes: "Success in Iraq, Bush’s victory on November 2, Arafat’s demise, and the ongoing appeal of economic and political freedom to ordinary folk, all triggered political changes across the globe that lessen the need for massive U.S. military intervention again soon."

Bush’s current foreign policy report card is a mixed bag: a B in Phys Ed and a string of Ds and Fs in more important, heavily weighted subjects.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has eased somewhat, largely thanks to an event that had nothing to do with Bush, Arafat’s death and replacement with Mahmoud Abbas. But even the Palestinian Authority’s own polls show that fewer than half of Palestinians accept recent elections as legitimate, while 84 percent of the population say they live without safety or security in their daily lives. Basic issues, such as Israeli colonies on Arab land, remain unresolved. Peace with Israel? Not in the near future.

Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarek, 76, has finally agreed to allow candidates to run against him for the presidency, but his most formidable challenger, Ayman Nour, was rotting in prison until January. He’s now under virtual house arrest, which makes campaigning a tad inconvenient. Even the deployment of government goons against pro-Nour demonstrators hasn’t reduced the flow of U.S. foreign aid (Egypt comes in second after Israel) or Egyptian anti-Americanism. "[Egyptian-American] relations are going through a seriously bad patch," a diplomat tells the UK Telegraph.

Libya has agreed to suspend its nuclear program and Syria is being pressured to pull its troops out of Lebanon, but neither move — both in strategic backwaters —significantly affects the economic or security prospects of American interests.

On to the big subjects:

Iran has long sought improved relations with the U.S. It is a rare opportunity to form a friendship with an oil-rich, politically influential regional player. North Korea, on the other hand, poses our biggest challenge: a nuclear capable state, led by a paranoid and isolated autocrat who has threatened to incinerate the West Coast. Bush’s charm offensive has been so badly botched that he has been reduced to promising that he has no immediate plans to invade Iran. "I hear all these rumors about military attacks, and it’s just not the truth," he says. But the U.S. is better poised to invade Iran than North Korea (and oil adds to the motivation). Bush has also failed to reassure North Korea. "We have taken a serious measure by increasing nuclear arms in preparation for any invasions by enemies," the North Korean regime said March 22. So long, Seattle.

Even the stirrings of electioneering in Iraq and Afghanistan have left the Muslim world cold. Both contests, held amid pervasive fraud, violence and corruption in active war zones where millions are too afraid to venture outdoors, are interpreted as ersatz democracy imposed upon puppet regimes created by a hostile occupation force. And the stooges are disorganized. Iraq’s fractious parties haven’t been able to form a government; Afghanistan’s elections have been delayed until the fall owing to the continuing war with the Taliban. A BBC poll taken in Turkey, a staunch American ally and the model secular state in the Islamic world, finds that 82 percent of Turks consider the United States under George W. Bush to be the greatest threat to world peace.

Is this a world "favorable to American principles and interests"? Clapping your hands is fun, but it doesn’t change jack.

Leave a comment
Print this article

Commentaires de l'article

> Why the World Hates the US
Thursday May 26 - 18:19 - Posted by da35fbffdd021648...

You started your article saying "Liberals have their faults..." implying what ?? That Bill Clinton was better than Bush?
As much as I loathe Chenney and Rumsfeld it is an undeniable fact that Bill Clinton murdered MORE people and hurt even more countries. Only with a kind of telegenic charm that hypnotised the liberal trendies into a state of mental and moral disconnect. As John Pilger has said "when it comes to death and destruction Bill Clinton wins hands down!"
Howard S Marks
Manchester UK

> Why the World Hates the US
Friday May 27 - 00:05 - Posted by 4723538000c891c9...

This is one of the stupidest opinion pages I have ever heard. I think you should rethink your first statement because you are saying some of the most pompous things I have heard come out of a human mouth.
First of all, in response to the fact that Bush should be impeached for lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. It was not his fault. The CIA, FBI, and the DEMOCRATIC LED Senate investigation team all determined the same thing, faulty intelligence. All current intelligence, intelligence collected by the US, the UN and Interpol said that Saddam Hussein had Weapons of Mass Destruction still not accounted for and he had yet to comply with UN regulations. After having UN inspectors hassled at every turn for a year, Bush decided that the threat was too great for the possibility of a vicious dictator that has already used WMDs on his on people to have the capabilities to attack another country. Also, Bush can’t be convicted in a war crimes tribunal because the only current one is the ICC, which the US hasn’t ratified yet, so keep up on your current events. Even if he could be tried, it would be unanimously decided that he was innocent. He never ordered the torture of any of the prisoners. To suggest so is so incredibly close to my definition of sedition that I would be very suspicious of your motives. Secondly, none of the people tortured by US soldiers could be called innocent by any means. They were caught in the act of suicide bombings in public places. Thirdly, every person involved in the Abu Gharib prison scandals was court-martialed, convicted, and punished. The US doesn’t tolerate torture by anyone, and Bush showed that.
Second of all, you really need to keep up on your current events. The one thing you did get right was the Saudi Elections. The UN wouldn’t allow US election monitors into Saudi Arabia, so yes the elections were quite slanted. However, this is still progress from a monarchy. Although the elections can be called free by no means, they were still elections, and even the US started off with all-male elections. Democracy has taken hold in Saudi Arabia, we just need to wait until it flourishes. Now Iraq, which had election turnouts of both sexes surpassing 60%, which beats even the US and France. The reason liberals have said that perhaps Bush was right is not because they were selling out, but because they see the success. They weren’t bitter about their mistakes, Bush apologized for his, so the only one not yet admitting they are wrong is you. Libya suspended its nuclear program because the US pushed for it, the UN voted not to sanction Libya. Evidently you haven’t read the newspaper in the last month because Syria pulled out of Lebanon almost that long ago. Changes are happening in the Middle East, and closing your eyes because a conservative president helped do it isn’t going to make it go away.
Lastly, the only thing that can be said bad about Bush’s foreign policy stance toward the Middle East is that it doesn’t go far enough. Abbas is screaming for US support in the region, which we are slowly relenting to. Hussein of Jordan is pursuing an active campaign to get the US to resolve conflicts around the West Bank. Israel has agreed to pull back settlement camps in surrounding Palestinian territory after being pushed by the US. Bush’s report card isn’t as bad as you claim it is, and not everthing he does exudes the bumbling-idiot persona. It’s time you got your head out of the liberal circulations you spend your life in and look around. Democracy is taking hold in the Middle East, and at least part of it is because of Bush.

Ben Denissen

> Why the World Hates the US
Sunday May 29 - 13:43 - Posted by 9b969d7af8d5f43f...

Funny, the "Downing Street Meeting Minutes" of a meeting between the top english intelligence agent and Tony Blair says that Bush already had his policy and that the intelligence and facts were being fixed around those policies. Further the memo states that Bush and England both knew that Iraq had no weapons of mass distruction. This memo was from 8 months before the United States unprovoked attack on a helpless country. The CIA, FBI and Senate all lied in order to support our going into this war. Even if you don’t believe the Downing Street Meeting Minutes, the way we just skipped past the areas during the invasion that supposedly contained all these WMD and didn’t check them out for months afterwards is a smoking gun that they knew there was no evidence in those locations and wanted to delay the discover of these inconvient facts for as long as possible. Our top weapons inspector said that there were no weapsons of mass destruction.

Bush lied. People died.

Bush lied. People died.

Bush lied. People died.

> Why the World Hates the US
Friday May 27 - 01:07 - Posted by bfcee33ce6ae91a8...

Americans prefer to live in a fantasy world. We like our Hollywood version of America better than the real one. Our way of dealing with this is to "buy" all of the fabricated fantasy the propaganda machine can pump out to us and convince ourselves that that is America, the land of the "FREE" the home of the "Brave".....we don’t want to know about how we’re being used by the military industrial complex and the power hungry neo-cons and that they have co-opted the religious fanatics that dominate our culture here to accomplish their agenda.

We like to think of America as heros that go around the world rescuing the oppressed citizens every where on the earth. We like to think or imagine we have the highest standards of living, and the most educated population, and the strongest largest economy. And as a clincher, we like knowing that we have armageddon in the silos just in case God calls on us to defend "Christian" values against the infidels. That is the real America, but don’t tell any Americans, even if they know it they certainly do not want you to bring it up and pop their bubble.

> Why the World Hates the US
Friday May 27 - 02:22 - Posted by bfcee33ce6ae91a8...

To make it clear: nobody hates American citizens. But we don’t like the American government which looks more and more like a dictatorship.

> Why the World Hates
Friday May 27 - 02:48 - Posted by 7d6d9b5b92903a79...

The title of the article "Why the World Hates the US" is really of an indictment of the human condition. Too bad Rall didn’t write an article titled "Why the World Hates". Examining the haters’ hate is more important than examining the subject of their hate. If I hate a certain minority, would you join me in exposing that group’s weaknesses or challenge me as to what drives my hate?


> Why the World Hates the US
Friday May 27 - 16:23 - Posted by f1c68dbc4c19674e...

Face it, Anti-American sentiment is basically self-hatred and anger misplaced. Focusing and indulging in anti-americanism is an expression of your powerlessness and failure. Governments, instead of making their civilians productive try to stop them from focusing on their ineptitude and failure by anti-americanism. America with all its excesses and imperfections dominate the lives of non-citizens around the world and make it obvious how little they have. That’s why they hate America and Bush.

> Why the World Hates the US
Saturday May 28 - 15:23 - Posted by fa15e807419754e4...

Your comment is beneath contempt. To suggest that a hatred for the way America does things is just self-hatred is as ludicrous as one has come to expect from the insular, moronic, bleating voices of the right.
You sir, are a fool. The US is not in itself hated. The way your government rampages around the world like a cowboy on crack is what we hate - and rightly so. Next time you want to play policeman to line the pockets of your corporate suits and their whores in high office just remember nobody - and I mean nobody - asks you to do it. Sod off and stay home.

> Why the World Hates the US
Tuesday May 31 - 10:37 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

Nice One. Concurring with above that it’s not the US that is ’hated’ ie not the country or it’s people -it’s like Iraq -a meglomaniacal twat with a load of yes men with greedy backers.

However, I think the rest of the world are starting to be disappointed with the US populace for their perceived apathy towards their genocidal leader(s).

> Why the World Hates the US
Tuesday May 31 - 23:13 - Posted by 7d6d9b5b92903a79...

"...nobody - and I mean nobody - asks you to do it..."

Kuwait asked for US help when Saddam invaded in 1990.


> Why the World Hates the US
Monday June 6 - 16:52 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

Madeleine Albright, in 1989 told Saddam ’’We have no problem with your territorial dispute with Kuwait’’. Give him the green light to invade and then Wham !

Kuwait was part of Iraq until carved up by the West in the 1920’s for oil theft. Puppet masters placed in charge of the big petrol station Q8.

If Iraq had annexed part the US for f***ing pretzels or whatever, I expect there would be a movement to reclaim the territory ?

> Why the World Hates the US
Thursday June 1 - 08:10 - Posted by eaafa4e410a67ebc...

I’m glad to read all this discussing and argumenting going on. It’s nice to see Americans of so many different opinions. It is however true that we all hate you and rest assured, we will also kill you all. Let me first say that these are not threats, these are statements of truth.
Your armies are weak, losing and scattered, your people are lazy, fat and sick and your country has no money. It is only a matter of time before you collapse.
At that point, many, many angry and rather aggressive individuals, among which I include myself, will come to your country and show you what your undisciplined troops have been doing to the world while you thought they were ensuring this elusive concept of ’democracy’.
We will show you what happens to the women of a country that loses a war and it is safe to say that your children will be better off dead as well.
You see, none of us really care whether you are for or against Bush. We don’t even care about your whole republican-democrat system and its differences of interest, policy or expression.
Frankly, we do not care about any of the reasons you might accredit for the sheer repulsion we feel for your nation.
We just want to brutalize and kill each and every last one of you, and we will.

Kind regards to you and yours,


Out of jail Eric Arnoux lands in Dubai
Friday 15 - 12:03
by Kerim
Trump uses Jews to get pedophile elected
Sunday 10 - 12:45
by Eaton
Wednesday 6 - 18:40
Saturday 18 - 01:38
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
Friday 10 - 15:13
Sorry, Ain’t got cash. God bless you, too.
Wednesday 8 - 09:22
by Bailey Anderson
Monday 30 - 19:43
Tuesday 17 - 23:07
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Tuesday 10 - 23:14
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Catalonia referendum: 90% voted for independence, say officials (video)
Monday 2 - 09:55
Catalonia referendum: ’Spanish authorities are the criminals’ (video)
Monday 2 - 09:47
If I was truly evil
Tuesday 12 - 14:22
Yves Bouvier Faces Swiss Tax Investigation
Saturday 9 - 03:27
by lishk
The Polisario front suspected of double-play around humanitarian aid hijacking
Friday 8 - 21:44
by NathanT
The Polisario front suspected of double-play around humanitarian aid hijacking
Friday 8 - 21:37
by Nathan Taylor
Sunday 27 - 20:02
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
What happend to Soraya and Hussein Khashoggi?
Friday 25 - 20:38
by Perseus
The falling Max Ehrich
Thursday 17 - 19:40
by celbbetty
Wednesday 16 - 01:44
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Overplaying your hand
Thursday 10 - 12:36
Gujarat Flood 2017 Devastation- Inevitable or Orchestrated in Dhanera ?
Thursday 3 - 06:19
by Dwarika Nath Rath
Multiple citizenship & Zionist subversion of America, Australia, India, Humanity
Wednesday 2 - 03:10
by Dr Gideon Polya
Thursday 27 - 23:23
by David R. Hoffman
The Top Ten Art Scandals That Have Rocked the World
Tuesday 18 - 15:48
by Curtis Judge
John Pilger slams Mainstream silence re Apartheid Israel crimes: Free Palestine
Thursday 13 - 02:43
by Dr Gideon Polya
Monday 3 - 14:52
by James Dolay
Saturday 1 - 00:31
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Australian Finkel Review has dirty energy for 50 years & ignores 25 key issues
Monday 19 - 03:37
by Dr Gideon Polya
Sunday 18 - 01:03
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Find out what is true and false about climate change - Kenneth Pouchet
Friday 16 - 17:43
by Kenneth Pouchet
Freedom For Me, But Not You
Wednesday 31 - 02:17
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Post-Apartheid, non-racist, One State, democratic Palestine can happen tomorrow
Tuesday 30 - 08:21
by Dr Gideon Polya
A Review of Gilad Atzmon’s new book, “Being In Time: The Post-Political Manifes
Wednesday 17 - 21:23
by June Terpstra
Avoiding Another War in North Korea
Sunday 14 - 18:27
by William John Cox
Judah Ben Hur for President 2020
Saturday 13 - 16:15
by William Morgan
Saturday 13 - 02:33
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
As War Party shadow boxes, its agenda surges unopposed
Friday 12 - 14:28
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Yves Bouvier caught in a real estate bankruptcy
Thursday 11 - 20:19
by Pierre Gove
Book: This Is How The State Fucks Your Mind
Tuesday 9 - 19:16
by OAF
Thursday 20 - 20:06

home | webmaster

Follow-up of the site's activity
RSS Bellaciao En

rss FR / rss IT / rss ES

Bellaciao hosted by DRI

Organize, agitate, educate, must be our war cry. Susan B. Anthony
Facebook Twitter Google+
I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name
Thursday 10 March
©Olivier Jobard/Myop I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM IS A RIGHT In the phrase « right to asylum », every word matters. Under the law, every person who is persecuted because of his or her political opinions or because of his or her identity, every person that is endangered by violence, war or misery has a RIGHT to seek asylum in another country The aim of this petition is to collect (...)
Neo-Nazis and far-right protesters in Ukraine 3 live-stream
Friday 24 January
The far-right in Ukraine are acting as the vanguard of a protest movement that is being reported as pro-democracy. The situation on the ground is not as simple as pro-EU and trade versus pro-Putin and Russian hegemony in the region. When US Senator John McCain dined with Ukraine’s opposition leaders in December, he shared a table and later a stage with the leader of the extreme far-right Svoboda party Oleh Tyahnybok. This is Oleh Tyahnybok, he has claimed a "Moscow-Jewish mafia" (...)
Hugo Chavez is dead (video live)
Wednesday 6 March
by : Collective BELLACIAO
1 comment
President Hugo Chavez companeros venezueliano died after a long battle with cancer.
International initiative to stop the war in Syria Yes to democracy, no to foreign intervention!
Thursday 13 December
Your support here: http://www.peaceinsyria.org/support.php We, the undersigned, who are part of an international civil society increasingly worried about the awful bloodshed of the Syrian people, are supporting a political initiative based on the results of a fact-finding mission which some of our colleagues undertook to Beirut and Damascus in September 2012. This initiative consists in calling for a delegation of highranking personalities and public figures to go to Syria in order to (...)
Monday 12 November
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
At first glance, the results of America’s 2012 election appear to be a triumph for social, racial, and economic justice and progress in the United States: California voters passed a proposition requiring the rich to shoulder their fair share of the tax burden; Two states, Colorado and Washington, legalized the recreational use of marijuana, while Massachusetts approved the use of marijuana for medical purposes; Washington and two other states, Maine and Maryland, legalized same-sex (...)
Sunday 28 October
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
In a 2004 episode of Comedy Central’s animated series South Park, an election was held to determine whether the new mascot for the town’s elementary school would be a “giant douche” or a “turd sandwich.” Confronted with these two equally unpalatable choices, one child, Stan Marsh, refused to vote at all, which resulted in his ostracization and subsequent banishment from the town. Although this satirical vulgarity was intended as a commentary on the two (...)
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART III If there is one major inconsistency in life, it is that young people who know little more than family, friends and school are suddenly, at the age of eighteen, supposed to decide what they want to do for the rest of their lives. Unfortunately, because of their limited life experiences, the illusions they have about certain occupations do not always comport to the realities. I discovered this the first time I went to college. About a year into my studies, I (...)
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART IV Disillusioned with the machinations of so-called “traditional” colleges, I became an adjunct instructor at several “for-profit” colleges. Thanks largely to the power and pervasiveness of the Internet, “for-profit” colleges (hereinafter for-profits) have become a growing phenomenon in America. They have also been the subject of much political debate and the focus of a Frontline special entitled College Inc. Unlike traditional (...)
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART III PART IV Several years ago, a young lady came into the college where I was teaching to inquire about a full-time instructor’s position in the sociology department. She was advised that only adjunct positions were available. Her response was, “No thanks. Once an adjunct, always an adjunct.” Her words still echo in my mind. Even as colleges and universities raise their tuition costs, they are relying more and more on adjunct instructors. Adjuncts are (...)
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART II PART III PART IV When The Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution over two hundred years ago, Americans were blessed with many rights considered to be “fundamental.” One conspicuously missing, however, was the right to an education. This was not surprising given the tenor of the times. America was primarily an agrarian culture, and education, especially higher education, was viewed as a privilege reserved for the children of the rich and (...)
Monday 30 July
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
If there is one universal question that haunts all human beings at some point in their lives, it is, “Why do we die?” Death, after all, is the great illogic. It ultimately claims all, the rich and the poor, the mighty and the small, the good and the evil. Death also has the capability to make most human pursuits—such as the quest for wealth, fame and power—vacuous and fleeting. Given this reality, I have often wondered why so many people are still willing to (...)
Thursday 28 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
How much corruption can a “democracy” endure before it ceases to be a democracy? If five venal, mendacious, duplicitous, amoral, biased and (dare I say it) satanic Supreme Court “justices”—John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy—have their way, America will soon find out. In several previous articles for Pravda.Ru, I have consistently warned how the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision is one of the (...)
Tuesday 12 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
1 comment
Imagine, if you will, that the United States government passes a law banning advertisers from sponsoring commercials on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show or Rupert Murdoch’s Fox (Faux) “News” Network. On one hand, there would be two decided advantages to this ban: The National IQ would undoubtedly increase several percentage points, and manipulative pseudo-journalists would no longer be able to appeal to the basest instincts in human nature for ratings and profit while (...)
Thursday 7 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Pravda.Ru Legal Editor
LIVE, from the State that brought you Senator Joseph McCarthy, Wisconsin voters now proudly present, fresh from his recall election victory, Governor Scott Walker! At first glance, it is almost unfathomable that anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have voted to retain Scott Walker as Wisconsin’s governor. This, after all, is a man who openly declared he is trying to destroy the rights of workers through a “divide and conquer” strategy; who received 61% of the (...)
Tuesday 13 March
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
A question I’ve frequently been asked since I began writing for Pravda.Ru in 2003 is, “Why did you become disillusioned with the practice of law?” This question is understandable, particularly since, in most people’s minds, being an attorney is synonymous with wealth and political power. I’ve always been reluctant to answer this question for fear it will discourage conscientious and ethical people from pursuing careers in the legal profession—a (...)