Home > How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps

How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps

by Open-Publishing - Wednesday 13 July 2005
21 comments

Attack-Terrorism Governments UK Trinity

BREAKING NEWS
– http://prisonplanet.com/articles/ju...

How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 13 2005

Ten Step Method To Staging a Terrorist Attack

1) Hire a Crisis Management firm to set up an exercise that parallels the terrorist attack you are going to carry out. Have them run the exercise at the precise locations and at the very same time as the attack. If at any stage of the attack your Arabs get caught, tell the police it was part of an exercise.

2) Hire four Arabs and tell them they’re taking part in an important exercise to help defend London from terrorist attacks. Strap them with rucksacks filled with deadly explosives. Tell the Arabs the rucksacks are dummy explosives and wouldn’t harm a fly.

3) Tell four Arabs to meet up at London Underground and disperse, each getting on a different train. Make sure Arabs meet in a location where you can get a good mug shot of them all on CCTV which you can later endlessly repeat to drooling masses on television.

4) While four Arabs are in London, plant explosives in their houses in Leeds. Plant some explosives in one of their cars in Luton for the police to later discover. Remember that Qu’ran and flight manual in the hijackers’ car? Ha ha, they fell for that one hook, line and sinker. No need to change tactics on this one.

5) Before the bombings take place, make sure you warn any of your buddies who are scheduled to be anywhere near where the bombs go off. If this gets leaked to the press, just deny it.

6) 4th Arab goes out partying in London night before and ends up getting out of bed late. No worries, the 9/11 ’hijackers’ did the same thing but that didn’t cause us a big problem. 4th Arab catches bus to see if other Arabs are waiting for him. 4th Arab starts hearing about explosions in the London Underground. 4th Arab comes to the realization that this he is being set up and freaks out. 4th Arab starts fiddling in his rucksack. 4th Arab sets bomb off and is blown up.

If you hired any additional Arabs and they also got wind of the set up, make sure tere are GPS locators in the rucksacks so you can have police snipers ready to kill them before they can blow the whistle.

7) After the bombs go off, put out a story for over an hour that the explosions are a simple electrical fault. This gives you cover time to make sure the lazy bus Arab is dead and any other hired Arabs who reneged are also dead. Make sure any CCTV footage that doesn’t support your official story is either seized or destroyed.

8) A few hours after the bombings, have one of your boys post an ’Al-Qaeda statement’ claiming responsibility. Don’t worry about the whole ’misreferencing the Qu’ran’ thing, these idiots don’t have the attention spans to figure it out.

9) After you have made sure that all the Arabs are dead and you are managing the story accordingly, wait for four days until the police piece together the story and find the explosives you planted in Leeds and in the car in Luton. Remember that Qu’ran and flight manual in the hijackers’ car? Ha ha, they fell for that one hook, line and sinker. No need to change tactics this time either. The time delay will convince the gullible public that a real investigation is taking place. Create a background of the hired Arabs being militant Muslims. The drooling masses, as was the case with the ’9/11 hijackers,’ will ignore stories of neighbours saying they were the quiet, educated types who liked children and playing sports.

BBC excerpt: One local resident described him as "a nice lad".

"He liked to play football, he liked to play cricket. I’m shocked."

Another resident said he was just a "normal kid" who played basketball and kicked a ball around.

10) Sit back and enjoy as Blair and his minions grandstand in front of television cameras about staying the course in the war on terror. The pay raise, extra agency funding, and power to strip more freedoms and liberties made the ten easy steps to staging a terrorist attack a worthwhile venture. The dozens of dead people were necessary collateral damage. This is a dirty war, we need to be less moral than the terrorists to defeat them.

And that’s how the government staged the bombings in ten easy steps.

Granted, you can interchange different pieces of the puzzle. The bombers could be real terrorists that knew exactly what they were doing. All you would need to do is control the ’mastermind’ behind the attack and make sure his boys carried out the job in the way you wanted. Voila.

Related: London Bombing Archive
– http://prisonplanet.com/archives/lo...


– http://www.libertyforum.org/...

The following was written by a former MI6 operative, Michael James, a few days ago:

- Eliza, being a perfectionist and the first to laugh at the CIA’s obvious home movie and audio productions of fake al Qaeda PR, was not entirely happy with substandard work. The press, however, would be cowed, online bloggers dismissed as nutty conspiracy theorists and the website pulled as soon as it had served its purpose. She could only hope that the ad hoc team charged with planting "clues" and tampering with forensic "evidence" in the subway stations would make a much better job at framing fictitious Islamic extremists. But, darling, no mini-vans full of Korans or miraculously intact Arab passports to be found within the eye of the blasts. Manningham-Buller sniggered into her coffee cup at the crass ineptitude of the Bush administration. British terrorism had always had a touch of class.

Also worth bearing in mind are the early reports that one, or two, men were shot by police in the London Docklands Area, which we have heard nothing of since:-

THE 7/7 LONDON PAPERS
– http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/l...

Londoners Suspicious Of Station Closures Before Blasts
– http://www.prisonplanet.com/article...

OPERATION NORTHWOODS
– http://hometown.aol.com/oldhipchic1...

More Links:
THE TOWER:PART5
– http://hometown.aol.com/oldhipchic1...

Forum posts

  • why is it that this kind of stuff only shows up on the websites where finatics hang out? what a pant-load! i say your milking the protest cow here!

    • Because people with common sense stopped watching design news on TV. period!

    • They were young Pakistani muslims incensed by the slaughter of their Muslim ’brothers’.

      To look for a conspiracy is human ’but often it is akin to the right wing Mccarthy witch hunts.

      There are millions of Muslims who feel an attack on one is an attack on all.
      There are elements of a Right wing Christian new ’crusade’ by Bush and Republicans. They won’t have to ’stage’ terrorism ever again. They’ve done enough to ensure that there will always be revenge bombs against their bombs.

      This was their intended strategy. It justifies interventions and invasions.

    • it’s not possible to sell someone the tower bridge if they’re not greedy. in any short con, the mark brings as much to the party as the con artist. this is what’s happening with this "exercise" story. people are jumping on it and adding bits to explain how the bombing was an authoritarian scam. think about it, if it wasn’t in itself largely innocent it would never have got on the TV. the visor exercise was a pen and paper run-through, for a private company. it wasn’t a physical wargame, and it didn’t involve public authorities like London Transport. HOWEVER, every lie tells a grain of truth about the liar, and the grain of truth in this "visor story" disinformation is just that - IT IS DISINFORMATION. the "coincidence" of it is unbelievable. focus on that, because the unbelievability of the coincidence implies foreknowledge on someone’s part. it’s falling for the con to add your own theories on "how it was done". that’s what the disinformation is inviting you to do, so that you can be disproved. just hold on to the fact that WE ARE BEING LIED TO. you don’t need anything more.

      peace.

  • These kinds of thoughts are easily dismissed as delusional but they are important.

    The fact that people are so shocked by the "profiles" of the bombers reveals how out of touch they are about the reality of the situation. Resorting to paranoia to explain this is just a more extreme measure of denial.

    The emerging picture defies the stereotypic image of a fanatical sociopathic maniac who is out for blood. Why does it strike the writer as odd that the bombers cared for children or were fathers? Many US soldiers in Iraq who killed unarmed civilians in Falluja probably have kids too.

    Westerners do not want to face the chilling truth of a calm and calculating underground movement like the Jews who planted bombs on German train tracks, and the French resistance. Didn’t the early Americans themselves slaughter the British in the hundreds with ambushes and bombs in their revolution?

    Today, more than ever, we live in a multicultural world. People’s loyalties may transcend national and political boundaries. What are we to do? There are two responses. One is to react with more xenophobia and authoritarian control. But we can’t reverse the global community in all its diversity. The other is for all people to work together to solve the world’s problems without occupying other countries.

    As long as there are arrogant, invading countries that occupy other people’s homes, there will be retaliatory acts. Some will call them terrorists, and others will call them resisters. Both are propaganda and lies. In contrast to the hatred they espouse for each other, they depend on each other for their existence. They need each other to perpetuate hate, fear, to justify war, social control and nationalism. Until we brand these as two faces of Janus, and reject both as part of the same murderous horde, we will continue to be manipulated and exploited in a costly game where neither side has our interests in mind.

  • I tend to think that the bombings were staged also but I want to add two points. One major point is this— 9/11 was carried out by the US government. As far as I can tell it was IMPOSSIBLE for a single jet to knock down a building that large in 13 seconds!!! So if someone will pull off a scam that large framing bombers is childs play. The second point is this— another website said they may have been drug mules so that is why that made them easier to set up.That makes more sense to me.

    • They were pissed of with US and GB foreign policy against Muslims. No conspiracy, no set up. Why can’t you accept this ?

    • errr... because we haven’t seen a photo of any of them getting on a train that actually blew up? because they all bought return rail tickets, and pay and display parking tickets, and were all carrying asbestos i.d. in specially armoured wallets? because they all blew themselves up at exactly the same time? whoever heard of a suicide bomber using a time fuse? go back to sleep now, we’ll wake you up when the big population cull starts next year.

    • Which is why all their relatives and friends are saying the same ? I don’t think you have a grasp on reality. To believe that this was state sponsored terrorism might fit your twisted logic but it was Pakistani Muslims with limited education manipulated by propaganda from an Islamic bookshop. If you lived in Britain and knew some Pakistanis you’d know that they feel every assault and Palestinian and Iraqi death as if it were their own family. Return rail tickets and a Pay and Display ticket would have been part of the agenda in not arising any suspicion or complication.

      Look, I know that to endorse the notion of a conspiracy theory makes you feel exclusive and important, but there’s no credence there

    • "pakistanis" with "limited education"?? mmm. maybe you should be questioning your own agenda here. meanwhile, if you want to agree with the official story you’re going to have to let go of your own "grasp on reality" because that story keeps changing. military explosive or bathtub boomjuice? sophisticated timers or kamikaze fanatics? whoops wait a minute there’s a new whisper from the security "experts". they weren’t "amateurish" suicide bombers (what the hell does a "professional" one look like?) no, they were "duped by their al quaeda masters". when the "careful, measured, police investigation" becomes as feverishly speculative and contradictory as a KKK website, it means your own prejudiced position is just as loony as everyone else. sorry.

    • Not prejudiced at all- nothing wrong or racist in pointing out the bombers ’education’ at a Madrassar. Look, I’m sure you’re anti government ok -like me. they are lying about a ’mastermind’ as by not giving the bombers credit to act on their own. But then there always has to be a ’mastermind’ ’Dr Evil ’ type figure in government accounts.

      If your fruitcake theory ever proves true i will eat my hat ok . Promise.

    • think we’re arguing over nothing here. my original point was it’s not necessary to have a fruitcake theory. it’s counterproductive and deliberately encouraged by journalists’ "sources" with spin and misinformation. so I don’t have a theory as such, just a political maxim of Claud Cockburn - "why is this bastard lying to me?". exercise a little parallax viewing here. the mood music coming from these unattributable gentlemen has turned round 180 degrees. it’s a foreign hit team/ it’s three guys from leeds/it’s military grade plastic/ it’s cooked up nitro from hugo boss perfume/ it’s sophisticated (i.e. swiss) timers/ it’s who said anything about timers? finally it’s suicide bombers acting very strangely ("amateurish" according to the BBC)/ nope. it’s four assassins "duped by their Al Quaeda handlers" into booby-trapping themselves. (yeah well I’ll buy that, just drop the A.Q. bit.). after all A.Q. "isn’t an organization as such" (tony blair) - no it’s a sort of "franchise" i.e. anybody that wants to call themselves Al Quaeda must be Al Quaeda (yeah well, come to think of it, I’ll buy that one too). as somebody’s said already "what a pant-load"!!

    • I honestly think the conflicting snippets of information released was a case of hapless ineptitude on behalf of the authorities. Three days into the bombing and the authorities had released only one victims identity. How inadequate ? Contrasted with the Madrid bombings, which claimed many more lives, all had been identified and buried in the same timescale.

      Only positive to come out now is that recent poll has 60% of UK in poll saying bombs were due to UKs role in supporting Bush.
      Now, Tony, you gonna do something, or carry on holding Bushs’ hand ?

    • Don’t know how old you guys are or what information you’re getting, but you’ve managed to argue and write about 10 strings to this message on snippets and hearsay. You both claim the other has lost grip on reality and your both right.

      1. You say it’s ’inadequate’ that it took the UK authorities so long to release ID’s for all the victims, compared to Madrid. Well no s*it Sherlock. The investigators are working underground, in a confined tunnel, among broken metal and bits of bodies, in 40C temperatures whilst trying to get enough evidence together to make a secure conviction aginst the perpetrators of this atrocity. So yes it did take a long time to ID the body parts in these conditions, and yes during a complex investigation the story will change as new evidence comes to light.

      Your friend says he doesn’t beleive that the suspects were responisble for the bombings because a) he hasn’t seen pictures of them getting on the trains (if he had wouldn’t he argue that photos can be manipulated) & that b) all the bombs went off together: ’have you ever heard of terrorist using a time fuse’ (Yes explosives wired to a mobile to detonate the bombs. This is what happened in Madrid)

      Do you think the above is a realistic consideration of the facts?

      2. The original message that started the string was ludicrous for the reasons given: That the US government must have perpatrated the 9-11 attacks because ’it is IMPOSSIBLE for the buildings hit by a jet airliner to come down in 13 seconds’

      Are you an architect or civil engineer? Do you have a firm grasp of the physics of the skyscraper or the structural consequences of an impact of a jet airliner full of fuel? They didn’t come down in 13 seconds, they burned for a consdierable time before they collapsed. Much to the discomfort of the 1000s of people trapped in the building.

      I’m not one of those people who blindly beleive that you must take the information given to you at face value or rally round the flag in ’blind patriotism’ when bad things happen.. but guys think about these things from a human level and don’t draw theories from newspaper reports or websites which you already discredit as minformation. Maybe the conspiracy theory phenomenon is a conspriracy: distracting us from the real issues and asking the hard questions that produce the violence in society today.. maybe I’m conspiring to conspire you into spreading that message. It goes round in circles!

      Why not look at why 4 British Citizens of Pakistani origin decided that this country was so bad that instead of moving away to a place where life was more tolerable for them, they instead decided to kill themselves and 54 innocent people around them in a grusome, agonising and undignified way... That is a much harder question to answer than the conjecture and consipiracy that you guys are advocating and that would be an issue worth having a 10 string argument about... ;-)

  • The ghost of Neville Chamberlain wrestles itself on this string.

    • Marvellous insight, and comparable situation. Yeah right.

    • top man. bought us all time at munich, then flew home and stepped up rearmanent - also issued the polish guarantee that got us into the war on the side of the angels. not bad for an "appeaser". you might not want to have a look at this?
      http://cunningrealist.blogspot.com/2005/07/following-money.html
      if war is "politics pursued by other means" (clausewitz) maybe terrorism is "tell mikey it was nothing personal, just business" (mario puzo).

    • Interesting site. Weren’t there dodgy airline share dealings before 9/11 as well ?

    • try googling "buzzy krongard". his princeton f.p. "didn’t he do well" biog is hilarious.... but if you want real insanity punch up "bush ratzinger"!

    • Thanks for the links, Bush and Ratzinger incredible. Could be old bush baby is angling for a back door latter day sainthood ?
      Saint Bush, now theres a misnomer if ever...