Le site Bellaciao: coloré, multiple, ou le meilleur cotoie fort heureusement le pire, mélangé, bizarre, picabien et dadaîste, explorant toutes sortes de registres et de régimes rhétoriques, drole et polémiqueur, surréaliste: rencontre d'un parapluie et d'une machine à coudre sur une table de dissection, têtes de Lénine sur le clavier d'un piano Steinway ou Bosendorfer...
FR
ES
Senal en Vivo
VIDEO
RADIO
FRIENDS SITES
with Bellaciao
Bellaciao hosted by
To rebel is right, to disobey is a duty, to act is necessary !
Bellaciao  mobile version   |   Home  |   About us   |   Donation  |   Links  |   Contact  |   Search
How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps

by : Trinity
Wednesday July 13, 2005 - 23:54
21 comments

BREAKING NEWS
 http://prisonplanet.com/articles/ju...

How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 13 2005

Ten Step Method To Staging a Terrorist Attack

1) Hire a Crisis Management firm to set up an exercise that parallels the terrorist attack you are going to carry out. Have them run the exercise at the precise locations and at the very same time as the attack. If at any stage of the attack your Arabs get caught, tell the police it was part of an exercise.

2) Hire four Arabs and tell them they’re taking part in an important exercise to help defend London from terrorist attacks. Strap them with rucksacks filled with deadly explosives. Tell the Arabs the rucksacks are dummy explosives and wouldn’t harm a fly.

3) Tell four Arabs to meet up at London Underground and disperse, each getting on a different train. Make sure Arabs meet in a location where you can get a good mug shot of them all on CCTV which you can later endlessly repeat to drooling masses on television.

4) While four Arabs are in London, plant explosives in their houses in Leeds. Plant some explosives in one of their cars in Luton for the police to later discover. Remember that Qu’ran and flight manual in the hijackers’ car? Ha ha, they fell for that one hook, line and sinker. No need to change tactics on this one.

5) Before the bombings take place, make sure you warn any of your buddies who are scheduled to be anywhere near where the bombs go off. If this gets leaked to the press, just deny it.

6) 4th Arab goes out partying in London night before and ends up getting out of bed late. No worries, the 9/11 ’hijackers’ did the same thing but that didn’t cause us a big problem. 4th Arab catches bus to see if other Arabs are waiting for him. 4th Arab starts hearing about explosions in the London Underground. 4th Arab comes to the realization that this he is being set up and freaks out. 4th Arab starts fiddling in his rucksack. 4th Arab sets bomb off and is blown up.

If you hired any additional Arabs and they also got wind of the set up, make sure tere are GPS locators in the rucksacks so you can have police snipers ready to kill them before they can blow the whistle.

7) After the bombs go off, put out a story for over an hour that the explosions are a simple electrical fault. This gives you cover time to make sure the lazy bus Arab is dead and any other hired Arabs who reneged are also dead. Make sure any CCTV footage that doesn’t support your official story is either seized or destroyed.

8) A few hours after the bombings, have one of your boys post an ’Al-Qaeda statement’ claiming responsibility. Don’t worry about the whole ’misreferencing the Qu’ran’ thing, these idiots don’t have the attention spans to figure it out.

9) After you have made sure that all the Arabs are dead and you are managing the story accordingly, wait for four days until the police piece together the story and find the explosives you planted in Leeds and in the car in Luton. Remember that Qu’ran and flight manual in the hijackers’ car? Ha ha, they fell for that one hook, line and sinker. No need to change tactics this time either. The time delay will convince the gullible public that a real investigation is taking place. Create a background of the hired Arabs being militant Muslims. The drooling masses, as was the case with the ’9/11 hijackers,’ will ignore stories of neighbours saying they were the quiet, educated types who liked children and playing sports.

BBC excerpt: One local resident described him as "a nice lad".

"He liked to play football, he liked to play cricket. I’m shocked."

Another resident said he was just a "normal kid" who played basketball and kicked a ball around.

10) Sit back and enjoy as Blair and his minions grandstand in front of television cameras about staying the course in the war on terror. The pay raise, extra agency funding, and power to strip more freedoms and liberties made the ten easy steps to staging a terrorist attack a worthwhile venture. The dozens of dead people were necessary collateral damage. This is a dirty war, we need to be less moral than the terrorists to defeat them.

And that’s how the government staged the bombings in ten easy steps.

Granted, you can interchange different pieces of the puzzle. The bombers could be real terrorists that knew exactly what they were doing. All you would need to do is control the ’mastermind’ behind the attack and make sure his boys carried out the job in the way you wanted. Voila.

Related: London Bombing Archive
 http://prisonplanet.com/archives/lo...



 http://www.libertyforum.org/...

The following was written by a former MI6 operative, Michael James, a few days ago:

- Eliza, being a perfectionist and the first to laugh at the CIA’s obvious home movie and audio productions of fake al Qaeda PR, was not entirely happy with substandard work. The press, however, would be cowed, online bloggers dismissed as nutty conspiracy theorists and the website pulled as soon as it had served its purpose. She could only hope that the ad hoc team charged with planting "clues" and tampering with forensic "evidence" in the subway stations would make a much better job at framing fictitious Islamic extremists. But, darling, no mini-vans full of Korans or miraculously intact Arab passports to be found within the eye of the blasts. Manningham-Buller sniggered into her coffee cup at the crass ineptitude of the Bush administration. British terrorism had always had a touch of class.

Also worth bearing in mind are the early reports that one, or two, men were shot by police in the London Docklands Area, which we have heard nothing of since:-

THE 7/7 LONDON PAPERS
 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/l...

Londoners Suspicious Of Station Closures Before Blasts
 http://www.prisonplanet.com/article...

OPERATION NORTHWOODS
 http://hometown.aol.com/oldhipchic1...

More Links:
THE TOWER:PART5
 http://hometown.aol.com/oldhipchic1...



Leave a comment
Print this article


Commentaires de l'article
 

> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Thursday July 14 - 05:14 - Posted by 4eb570d4c488caf2...

why is it that this kind of stuff only shows up on the websites where finatics hang out? what a pant-load! i say your milking the protest cow here!




> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Thursday July 14 - 07:49 - Posted by dd2d8907b3fb247b...

Because people with common sense stopped watching design news on TV. period!



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Thursday July 14 - 09:50 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

They were young Pakistani muslims incensed by the slaughter of their Muslim ’brothers’.

To look for a conspiracy is human ’but often it is akin to the right wing Mccarthy witch hunts.

There are millions of Muslims who feel an attack on one is an attack on all.
There are elements of a Right wing Christian new ’crusade’ by Bush and Republicans. They won’t have to ’stage’ terrorism ever again. They’ve done enough to ensure that there will always be revenge bombs against their bombs.

This was their intended strategy. It justifies interventions and invasions.



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Saturday July 16 - 14:32 - Posted by e378fdaf8bd0d5a7...

it’s not possible to sell someone the tower bridge if they’re not greedy. in any short con, the mark brings as much to the party as the con artist. this is what’s happening with this "exercise" story. people are jumping on it and adding bits to explain how the bombing was an authoritarian scam. think about it, if it wasn’t in itself largely innocent it would never have got on the TV. the visor exercise was a pen and paper run-through, for a private company. it wasn’t a physical wargame, and it didn’t involve public authorities like London Transport. HOWEVER, every lie tells a grain of truth about the liar, and the grain of truth in this "visor story" disinformation is just that - IT IS DISINFORMATION. the "coincidence" of it is unbelievable. focus on that, because the unbelievability of the coincidence implies foreknowledge on someone’s part. it’s falling for the con to add your own theories on "how it was done". that’s what the disinformation is inviting you to do, so that you can be disproved. just hold on to the fact that WE ARE BEING LIED TO. you don’t need anything more.

peace.



Two peas in a pod
Thursday July 14 - 15:09 - Posted by add32efd2abef9a1...

These kinds of thoughts are easily dismissed as delusional but they are important.

The fact that people are so shocked by the "profiles" of the bombers reveals how out of touch they are about the reality of the situation. Resorting to paranoia to explain this is just a more extreme measure of denial.

The emerging picture defies the stereotypic image of a fanatical sociopathic maniac who is out for blood. Why does it strike the writer as odd that the bombers cared for children or were fathers? Many US soldiers in Iraq who killed unarmed civilians in Falluja probably have kids too.

Westerners do not want to face the chilling truth of a calm and calculating underground movement like the Jews who planted bombs on German train tracks, and the French resistance. Didn’t the early Americans themselves slaughter the British in the hundreds with ambushes and bombs in their revolution?

Today, more than ever, we live in a multicultural world. People’s loyalties may transcend national and political boundaries. What are we to do? There are two responses. One is to react with more xenophobia and authoritarian control. But we can’t reverse the global community in all its diversity. The other is for all people to work together to solve the world’s problems without occupying other countries.

As long as there are arrogant, invading countries that occupy other people’s homes, there will be retaliatory acts. Some will call them terrorists, and others will call them resisters. Both are propaganda and lies. In contrast to the hatred they espouse for each other, they depend on each other for their existence. They need each other to perpetuate hate, fear, to justify war, social control and nationalism. Until we brand these as two faces of Janus, and reject both as part of the same murderous horde, we will continue to be manipulated and exploited in a costly game where neither side has our interests in mind.




> Two peas in a pod
Thursday July 14 - 16:51 - Posted by 4eb570d4c488caf2...

they used to talk like that in japan. it will pass.



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Sunday July 17 - 18:30 - Posted by bde064cc6ccebb35...

I tend to think that the bombings were staged also but I want to add two points. One major point is this— 9/11 was carried out by the US government. As far as I can tell it was IMPOSSIBLE for a single jet to knock down a building that large in 13 seconds!!! So if someone will pull off a scam that large framing bombers is childs play. The second point is this— another website said they may have been drug mules so that is why that made them easier to set up.That makes more sense to me.




> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Monday July 18 - 08:24 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

They were pissed of with US and GB foreign policy against Muslims. No conspiracy, no set up. Why can’t you accept this ?



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Monday July 18 - 15:57 - Posted by e378fdaf8bd0d5a7...

errr... because we haven’t seen a photo of any of them getting on a train that actually blew up? because they all bought return rail tickets, and pay and display parking tickets, and were all carrying asbestos i.d. in specially armoured wallets? because they all blew themselves up at exactly the same time? whoever heard of a suicide bomber using a time fuse? go back to sleep now, we’ll wake you up when the big population cull starts next year.



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Monday July 18 - 16:43 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

Which is why all their relatives and friends are saying the same ? I don’t think you have a grasp on reality. To believe that this was state sponsored terrorism might fit your twisted logic but it was Pakistani Muslims with limited education manipulated by propaganda from an Islamic bookshop. If you lived in Britain and knew some Pakistanis you’d know that they feel every assault and Palestinian and Iraqi death as if it were their own family. Return rail tickets and a Pay and Display ticket would have been part of the agenda in not arising any suspicion or complication.

Look, I know that to endorse the notion of a conspiracy theory makes you feel exclusive and important, but there’s no credence there



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Monday July 18 - 17:34 - Posted by e378fdaf8bd0d5a7...

"pakistanis" with "limited education"?? mmm. maybe you should be questioning your own agenda here. meanwhile, if you want to agree with the official story you’re going to have to let go of your own "grasp on reality" because that story keeps changing. military explosive or bathtub boomjuice? sophisticated timers or kamikaze fanatics? whoops wait a minute there’s a new whisper from the security "experts". they weren’t "amateurish" suicide bombers (what the hell does a "professional" one look like?) no, they were "duped by their al quaeda masters". when the "careful, measured, police investigation" becomes as feverishly speculative and contradictory as a KKK website, it means your own prejudiced position is just as loony as everyone else. sorry.



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Tuesday July 19 - 10:08 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

Not prejudiced at all- nothing wrong or racist in pointing out the bombers ’education’ at a Madrassar. Look, I’m sure you’re anti government ok -like me. they are lying about a ’mastermind’ as by not giving the bombers credit to act on their own. But then there always has to be a ’mastermind’ ’Dr Evil ’ type figure in government accounts.

If your fruitcake theory ever proves true i will eat my hat ok . Promise.



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Tuesday July 19 - 13:36 - Posted by e378fdaf8bd0d5a7...

think we’re arguing over nothing here. my original point was it’s not necessary to have a fruitcake theory. it’s counterproductive and deliberately encouraged by journalists’ "sources" with spin and misinformation. so I don’t have a theory as such, just a political maxim of Claud Cockburn - "why is this bastard lying to me?". exercise a little parallax viewing here. the mood music coming from these unattributable gentlemen has turned round 180 degrees. it’s a foreign hit team/ it’s three guys from leeds/it’s military grade plastic/ it’s cooked up nitro from hugo boss perfume/ it’s sophisticated (i.e. swiss) timers/ it’s who said anything about timers? finally it’s suicide bombers acting very strangely ("amateurish" according to the BBC)/ nope. it’s four assassins "duped by their Al Quaeda handlers" into booby-trapping themselves. (yeah well I’ll buy that, just drop the A.Q. bit.). after all A.Q. "isn’t an organization as such" (tony blair) - no it’s a sort of "franchise" i.e. anybody that wants to call themselves Al Quaeda must be Al Quaeda (yeah well, come to think of it, I’ll buy that one too). as somebody’s said already "what a pant-load"!!



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Tuesday July 19 - 14:42 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

I honestly think the conflicting snippets of information released was a case of hapless ineptitude on behalf of the authorities. Three days into the bombing and the authorities had released only one victims identity. How inadequate ? Contrasted with the Madrid bombings, which claimed many more lives, all had been identified and buried in the same timescale.

Only positive to come out now is that recent poll has 60% of UK in poll saying bombs were due to UKs role in supporting Bush.
Now, Tony, you gonna do something, or carry on holding Bushs’ hand ?



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Friday August 12 - 14:04 - Posted by 8b0476a613d0d0cc...

Don’t know how old you guys are or what information you’re getting, but you’ve managed to argue and write about 10 strings to this message on snippets and hearsay. You both claim the other has lost grip on reality and your both right.

1. You say it’s ’inadequate’ that it took the UK authorities so long to release ID’s for all the victims, compared to Madrid. Well no s*it Sherlock. The investigators are working underground, in a confined tunnel, among broken metal and bits of bodies, in 40C temperatures whilst trying to get enough evidence together to make a secure conviction aginst the perpetrators of this atrocity. So yes it did take a long time to ID the body parts in these conditions, and yes during a complex investigation the story will change as new evidence comes to light.

Your friend says he doesn’t beleive that the suspects were responisble for the bombings because a) he hasn’t seen pictures of them getting on the trains (if he had wouldn’t he argue that photos can be manipulated) & that b) all the bombs went off together: ’have you ever heard of terrorist using a time fuse’ (Yes explosives wired to a mobile to detonate the bombs. This is what happened in Madrid)

Do you think the above is a realistic consideration of the facts?

2. The original message that started the string was ludicrous for the reasons given: That the US government must have perpatrated the 9-11 attacks because ’it is IMPOSSIBLE for the buildings hit by a jet airliner to come down in 13 seconds’

Are you an architect or civil engineer? Do you have a firm grasp of the physics of the skyscraper or the structural consequences of an impact of a jet airliner full of fuel? They didn’t come down in 13 seconds, they burned for a consdierable time before they collapsed. Much to the discomfort of the 1000s of people trapped in the building.

I’m not one of those people who blindly beleive that you must take the information given to you at face value or rally round the flag in ’blind patriotism’ when bad things happen.. but guys think about these things from a human level and don’t draw theories from newspaper reports or websites which you already discredit as minformation. Maybe the conspiracy theory phenomenon is a conspriracy: distracting us from the real issues and asking the hard questions that produce the violence in society today.. maybe I’m conspiring to conspire you into spreading that message. It goes round in circles!

Why not look at why 4 British Citizens of Pakistani origin decided that this country was so bad that instead of moving away to a place where life was more tolerable for them, they instead decided to kill themselves and 54 innocent people around them in a grusome, agonising and undignified way... That is a much harder question to answer than the conjecture and consipiracy that you guys are advocating and that would be an issue worth having a 10 string argument about... ;-)



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Tuesday July 19 - 21:04 - Posted by 563d90df3e621ce2...

The ghost of Neville Chamberlain wrestles itself on this string.




> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Wednesday July 20 - 08:56 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

Marvellous insight, and comparable situation. Yeah right.



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Wednesday July 20 - 13:26 - Posted by e378fdaf8bd0d5a7...

top man. bought us all time at munich, then flew home and stepped up rearmanent - also issued the polish guarantee that got us into the war on the side of the angels. not bad for an "appeaser". you might not want to have a look at this?
http://cunningrealist.blogspot.com/...
if war is "politics pursued by other means" (clausewitz) maybe terrorism is "tell mikey it was nothing personal, just business" (mario puzo).



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Wednesday July 20 - 14:40 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

Interesting site. Weren’t there dodgy airline share dealings before 9/11 as well ?



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Thursday July 21 - 11:52 - Posted by e378fdaf8bd0d5a7...

try googling "buzzy krongard". his princeton f.p. "didn’t he do well" biog is hilarious.... but if you want real insanity punch up "bush ratzinger"!



> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
Thursday July 21 - 12:13 - Posted by 1ebd73fbe1f545ca...

Thanks for the links, Bush and Ratzinger incredible. Could be old bush baby is angling for a back door latter day sainthood ?
Saint Bush, now theres a misnomer if ever...






SUPPORT RACISM: WATCH THE NFL
Saturday 18 - 01:38
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IN SAUDI ARABIA?
Friday 10 - 15:13
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Sorry, Ain’t got cash. God bless you, too.
Wednesday 8 - 09:22
by Bailey Anderson
REFLECTIONS ON HOW LITTLE IS REVEALED BY JUST-RELEASED JFK ASSASSINATION DOCUMEN
Monday 30 - 19:43
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
PEOPLE OF COLOR: THE NFL DOESN’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOU
Tuesday 17 - 23:07
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
TRUMP, JONES, THE NFL, AND THE NEW MCCARTHYISM
Tuesday 10 - 23:14
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Catalonia referendum: 90% voted for independence, say officials (video)
Monday 2 - 09:55
Catalonia referendum: ’Spanish authorities are the criminals’ (video)
Monday 2 - 09:47
If I was truly evil
Tuesday 12 - 14:22
Yves Bouvier Faces Swiss Tax Investigation
Saturday 9 - 03:27
by lishk
The Polisario front suspected of double-play around humanitarian aid hijacking
Friday 8 - 21:44
by NathanT
The Polisario front suspected of double-play around humanitarian aid hijacking
Friday 8 - 21:37
by Nathan Taylor
AMERICA’S JUDASES
Sunday 27 - 20:02
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
What happend to Soraya and Hussein Khashoggi?
Friday 25 - 20:38
by Perseus
The falling Max Ehrich
Thursday 17 - 19:40
by celbbetty
DAMN THE NFL
Wednesday 16 - 01:44
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Overplaying your hand
Thursday 10 - 12:36
Gujarat Flood 2017 Devastation- Inevitable or Orchestrated in Dhanera ?
Thursday 3 - 06:19
by Dwarika Nath Rath
Multiple citizenship & Zionist subversion of America, Australia, India, Humanity
Wednesday 2 - 03:10
by Dr Gideon Polya
I’M AN IDIOT AND I VOTE
Thursday 27 - 23:23
by David R. Hoffman
The Top Ten Art Scandals That Have Rocked the World
Tuesday 18 - 15:48
by Curtis Judge
John Pilger slams Mainstream silence re Apartheid Israel crimes: Free Palestine
Thursday 13 - 02:43
by Dr Gideon Polya
RUSSIAN MAFIA – NOW IN DUBAI?
Monday 3 - 14:52
by James Dolay
THE NFL IS RACIST
Saturday 1 - 00:31
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Australian Finkel Review has dirty energy for 50 years & ignores 25 key issues
Monday 19 - 03:37
by Dr Gideon Polya
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: JUSTICE FOR PHILANDO CASTILE
Sunday 18 - 01:03
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Find out what is true and false about climate change - Kenneth Pouchet
Friday 16 - 17:43
by Kenneth Pouchet
Freedom For Me, But Not You
Wednesday 31 - 02:17
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
Post-Apartheid, non-racist, One State, democratic Palestine can happen tomorrow
Tuesday 30 - 08:21
by Dr Gideon Polya
A Review of Gilad Atzmon’s new book, “Being In Time: The Post-Political Manifes
Wednesday 17 - 21:23
by June Terpstra
Avoiding Another War in North Korea
Sunday 14 - 18:27
by William John Cox
Judah Ben Hur for President 2020
Saturday 13 - 16:15
by William Morgan
ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FOR DONALD J. TRUMP
Saturday 13 - 02:33
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Report
As War Party shadow boxes, its agenda surges unopposed
Friday 12 - 14:28
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Yves Bouvier caught in a real estate bankruptcy
Thursday 11 - 20:19
by Pierre Gove
Book: This Is How The State Fucks Your Mind
Tuesday 9 - 19:16
by OAF
ISRAEL’S 1967 ATTACK ON INTELLIGENCE SHIP U.S.S. LIBERTY - THE ONLY MYSTERY
Thursday 20 - 20:06
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Denmark eaten down to the bone, what’s next?
Wednesday 19 - 16:22
by Henrik Petersen
A Financial Toll Tax: Transform, Not Reform, the U.S. Tax System
Monday 17 - 22:55
by William John Cox
COMPLETE DEGRADATION OF A SELF-STYLED GREAT NATION
Saturday 8 - 16:35
by JOHN CHUCKMAN

home | webmaster



Follow-up of the site's activity
RSS Bellaciao En


rss FR / rss IT / rss ES



Bellaciao hosted by DRI

It is the responsibility of the intellectual to speak the truth and to expose lies. Noam Chomsky
Facebook Twitter Google+
DAZIBAO
I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name
Thursday 10 March
©Olivier Jobard/Myop I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM IS A RIGHT In the phrase « right to asylum », every word matters. Under the law, every person who is persecuted because of his or her political opinions or because of his or her identity, every person that is endangered by violence, war or misery has a RIGHT to seek asylum in another country The aim of this petition is to collect (...)
read more...
Neo-Nazis and far-right protesters in Ukraine 3 live-stream
Friday 24 January
2 comments
The far-right in Ukraine are acting as the vanguard of a protest movement that is being reported as pro-democracy. The situation on the ground is not as simple as pro-EU and trade versus pro-Putin and Russian hegemony in the region. When US Senator John McCain dined with Ukraine’s opposition leaders in December, he shared a table and later a stage with the leader of the extreme far-right Svoboda party Oleh Tyahnybok. This is Oleh Tyahnybok, he has claimed a "Moscow-Jewish mafia" (...)
read more...
Hugo Chavez is dead (video live)
Wednesday 6 March
by : Collective BELLACIAO
1 comment
President Hugo Chavez companeros venezueliano died after a long battle with cancer.
read more...
International initiative to stop the war in Syria Yes to democracy, no to foreign intervention!
Thursday 13 December
Your support here: http://www.peaceinsyria.org/support.php We, the undersigned, who are part of an international civil society increasingly worried about the awful bloodshed of the Syrian people, are supporting a political initiative based on the results of a fact-finding mission which some of our colleagues undertook to Beirut and Damascus in September 2012. This initiative consists in calling for a delegation of highranking personalities and public figures to go to Syria in order to (...)
read more...
THE KU KLUX KLAN ONCE AGAIN CONTROLS INDIANA
Monday 12 November
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
7 comments
At first glance, the results of America’s 2012 election appear to be a triumph for social, racial, and economic justice and progress in the United States: California voters passed a proposition requiring the rich to shoulder their fair share of the tax burden; Two states, Colorado and Washington, legalized the recreational use of marijuana, while Massachusetts approved the use of marijuana for medical purposes; Washington and two other states, Maine and Maryland, legalized same-sex (...)
read more...
I’VE DECIDED TO "WASTE" MY VOTE
Sunday 28 October
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
In a 2004 episode of Comedy Central’s animated series South Park, an election was held to determine whether the new mascot for the town’s elementary school would be a “giant douche” or a “turd sandwich.” Confronted with these two equally unpalatable choices, one child, Stan Marsh, refused to vote at all, which resulted in his ostracization and subsequent banishment from the town. Although this satirical vulgarity was intended as a commentary on the two (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART IV
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART III If there is one major inconsistency in life, it is that young people who know little more than family, friends and school are suddenly, at the age of eighteen, supposed to decide what they want to do for the rest of their lives. Unfortunately, because of their limited life experiences, the illusions they have about certain occupations do not always comport to the realities. I discovered this the first time I went to college. About a year into my studies, I (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART III
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART IV Disillusioned with the machinations of so-called “traditional” colleges, I became an adjunct instructor at several “for-profit” colleges. Thanks largely to the power and pervasiveness of the Internet, “for-profit” colleges (hereinafter for-profits) have become a growing phenomenon in America. They have also been the subject of much political debate and the focus of a Frontline special entitled College Inc. Unlike traditional (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART II
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART III PART IV Several years ago, a young lady came into the college where I was teaching to inquire about a full-time instructor’s position in the sociology department. She was advised that only adjunct positions were available. Her response was, “No thanks. Once an adjunct, always an adjunct.” Her words still echo in my mind. Even as colleges and universities raise their tuition costs, they are relying more and more on adjunct instructors. Adjuncts are (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART I
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART II PART III PART IV When The Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution over two hundred years ago, Americans were blessed with many rights considered to be “fundamental.” One conspicuously missing, however, was the right to an education. This was not surprising given the tenor of the times. America was primarily an agrarian culture, and education, especially higher education, was viewed as a privilege reserved for the children of the rich and (...)
read more...
ONE SOLITARY LIFE, PART TWO
Monday 30 July
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
3 comments
If there is one universal question that haunts all human beings at some point in their lives, it is, “Why do we die?” Death, after all, is the great illogic. It ultimately claims all, the rich and the poor, the mighty and the small, the good and the evil. Death also has the capability to make most human pursuits—such as the quest for wealth, fame and power—vacuous and fleeting. Given this reality, I have often wondered why so many people are still willing to (...)
read more...
HOW MUCH CORRUPTION CAN DEMOCRACY ENDURE?
Thursday 28 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
6 comments
How much corruption can a “democracy” endure before it ceases to be a democracy? If five venal, mendacious, duplicitous, amoral, biased and (dare I say it) satanic Supreme Court “justices”—John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy—have their way, America will soon find out. In several previous articles for Pravda.Ru, I have consistently warned how the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision is one of the (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS, PART TWO
Tuesday 12 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
1 comment
Imagine, if you will, that the United States government passes a law banning advertisers from sponsoring commercials on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show or Rupert Murdoch’s Fox (Faux) “News” Network. On one hand, there would be two decided advantages to this ban: The National IQ would undoubtedly increase several percentage points, and manipulative pseudo-journalists would no longer be able to appeal to the basest instincts in human nature for ratings and profit while (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS
Thursday 7 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Pravda.Ru Legal Editor
4 comments
LIVE, from the State that brought you Senator Joseph McCarthy, Wisconsin voters now proudly present, fresh from his recall election victory, Governor Scott Walker! At first glance, it is almost unfathomable that anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have voted to retain Scott Walker as Wisconsin’s governor. This, after all, is a man who openly declared he is trying to destroy the rights of workers through a “divide and conquer” strategy; who received 61% of the (...)
read more...
PEOPLE WITHOUT SOULS
Tuesday 13 March
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
2 comments
A question I’ve frequently been asked since I began writing for Pravda.Ru in 2003 is, “Why did you become disillusioned with the practice of law?” This question is understandable, particularly since, in most people’s minds, being an attorney is synonymous with wealth and political power. I’ve always been reluctant to answer this question for fear it will discourage conscientious and ethical people from pursuing careers in the legal profession—a (...)
read more...