Home > Press Silence on Impeachment

Press Silence on Impeachment

by Open-Publishing - Friday 7 October 2005
4 comments

Media-Network Governments USA

Text of Radio BC audio commentary

October 6 2005

Press Silence on Impeachment

Listen Now

The corporate media in the United States can hardly claim to fill a journalistic role, anymore. The first duty of a real newsperson is to ask questions. But the corporate press can’t bring itself to ask even the most obvious questions, including on issues that are important to a high proportion of the public. When we refer to the corporate media, we’re also talking about the major polling organizations, that work hand in glove with the leading newspapers and broadcast outfits.

To date, only one pollster, Zogby International, has inquired about public opinion regarding the impeachment of George Bush. That was four months ago. Zogby found that 42 percent of respondents would favor impeachment if Bush "did not tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq." Other polls show that something around a majority of Americans are now convinced that Bush and his crew did, indeed, not tell the truth. The implication is clear: if the corporate media would raise the issue of popular opinion on impeachment, they would find evidence for strong public support. But only Zogby raised the issue, and even they refuse to ask the question again unless somebody pays them to do so. This, as Bush’s polling numbers continue to fall, indicating that there is probably more support for impeachment now than there was back in June.

This corporate media abrogation of responsibility stands in sharp contrast to the frenzy of impeachment discussion to which President Bill Clinton was subjected, less than a decade ago. And Clinton was only accused of bad personal behavior - not of starting a war under false pretenses. We are also reminded of the meekness of the corporate media when President Ronald Reagan employed blatantly illegal means to wage war against Nicaragua, repeatedly lying to the congress in the process. The reason is simple: corporate media is just that - corporate, and corporations prefer Republicans. Corporate owners actively discourage real journalism, lest it threaten their fellows among the rich and powerful. Instead, we get quipsters on cable and pure political hacks like Judith Miller at the New York Times. The market for real journalists has virtually disappeared in the U.S . Journalism schools at universities now share the same department as public relations schools. The difference between the two has blurred to the point of virtual nonexistence.

Thus, an eminently impeachable president whom a near-majority of Americans believe should be held accountable for lying, gets off scot-free in the media. A coalition of anti-war groups is now raising the money to hire a polling outfit to ask the question that the press and pollsters should be asking on their own: should George Bush be impeached?

In the United States, you can’t get news or an accurate account of public opinion, unless you pay for it. Journalism is all but extinct. For Radio BC, I’m Glen Ford.

You can visit the Radio BC page to listen to any of our audio commentaries voiced by BC Co-Publisher and Editor-in-Chief, Glen Ford. We publish the text of the radio commentary each week along with the audio program.

http://www.blackcommentator.com/rad...

Forum posts

  • All of the Democrats in the House of Representatives and 16 Republicans have to agree that impeachment is warranted. Without this highly unlikely consensus, there can be no impeachment of Bush even if a poll were to reveal that a majority of Americans want it. These clowns in congress answer to another (corporate) voice.

    • Everyone knows that Congress is corrupt! When the majority of people polled favor impeachment and Congress does nothing about it... history will show this as the very dark period it is!!
      Someday people looking back will ask "How could this have been allowed to happen?"

  • that is not the only way to remove a president ... and impeachment does not mean removal, which is what is needed here ...

    have you researched amendment 14 section 3 ... search is on for the lawyer to take the current situation before a jury ...

    • Have you researched the 14th amendment? To what jury are you referring? Section 3 of same clearly states that the congress by a two-thirds vote of both houses shall remove such a "disability," relating to any public officer at the state or federal level, including military, who has engaged in "insurrection or rebellion," or has given "aid or comfort to the enemies..."

      How does this provision apply to G.W. Bush? Please explain. And, I didn’t state that impeachment automatically leads to removal from office. But, constitutionally speaking, it is the necessary first step. Then, the Senate would have to convict by a two-thirds vote for the president to be removed from office.