Home > Leftist Morales Claims Victory in Bolivia

Leftist Morales Claims Victory in Bolivia

by Open-Publishing - Tuesday 20 December 2005
1 comment

Elections-Elected Governments South/Latin America

By FIONA SMITH

COCHABAMBA, Bolivia - The Socialist firebrand who claimed victory in Bolivia’s presidential race repeated his promise to end a U.S.-backed crusade against coca plants, but said Monday his government would respect private property.

Unofficial results showed Evo Morales - himself a coca farmer - with a decisive lead over seven opponents that would make him the first Indian president in the 180-year history of independent Bolivia and solidify a continental leftward shift.

Morales was congratulated by Venezuela’s self-proclaimed revolutionary leader Hugo Chavez and by the more centrist Socialist president of Chile, Ricardo Lagos. No early call came from the United States, and Morales said, "neither was I expecting one."

A State Department spokeswoman, Jan Edmondson, later said in Washington that "while official results have not yet been released, we congratulate Evo Morales on his apparent victory."

She said the U.S. has had good relations with Bolivia in the past and "we’re prepared to work to build the same relationship with the next government."

Apparently trying to reassure foreign investors, Morales said his government would respect private property even as it asserts state ownership over Bolivia’s natural gas reserves. Multinational companies would be paid to help in exploration and to develop the industry, he said.

Morales has been an irritant for Washington for years while he has built close ties with Cuban President Fidel Castro and Chavez. A State Department report earlier this year referred to him as an "illegal-coca agitator."

On Monday, Morales said a governing Movement Toward Socialism party "is not only going to respect, but is going to protect private property," although "vacant, unproductive land" would be turned over to farmers with no land or very little. His comments echoed policies already in place in Venezuela to grant the poor title to land owned by big companies or individuals that has been deemed unproductive by the government.

The site of the news conference - the offices of the coca growers union where he rose to political prominence - showed that his apparent victory did not mellow his crusade against U.S. coca-eradication efforts.

"We are betting on an effective fight against narcotrafficking because neither cocaine nor drug trafficking is part of Bolivian culture," Morales said.

He has not said how he will stop illegal drug exports, complaining instead that "the fight against drug trafficking has been a pretext for the U.S. government to install military bases ... and these policies will be revised."

Morales also defended coca - the raw material for cocaine - as an integral part of Bolivian culture.

Complete official returns were not expected before Tuesday, but three independent vote counts sponsored by Bolivian news media showed Morales at or above the clear majority he would need to win outright. If he falls short, Bolivia’s congress would decide the winner, but it would be under enormous pressure to choose the clear front-runner.

No candidate in decades has won by such a landslide, marking a turning point in a country traditionally governed by the non-Indian elite. Like most Bolivians, Morales grew up in extreme poverty; only two of his six brothers and sisters survived childhood in Bolivia’s bleak Andean highlands.

"The people have dealt him a very strong mandate," said Former Foreign Minister Gustavo Fernandez. He said congressional confirmation would be a "mere formality" if Morales falls short of a straight majority.

Fernandez considers the election a dramatic triumph for South America’s leftists: After years of strikes, protests and barricade-building, the people are finally in the position to demand more power from entrenched ruling classes.

"This isn’t just about Bolivia; this is happening across Latin America," Fernandez said. "There is now a wave of popular movements sweeping across the region, not only in Bolivia but also in Uruguay, Brazil and other countries." (AP)

Forum posts

  • After reading a half dozen standard MSM reports I sent the following brief comment :

    Editorial responses; http://ny.metro.us/metro/yourturn December 22, 2005

    A brief factual report however I get tired of reading the standard selective anxiety provoking rhetoric eg Chavez as "self proclaimed revolutionary leader" and selecting Morales (leader of a rebel group and throwing in Cuba)"the left wing tide"-"vacant, unproductive land" etc .
    If I was not familiar with the history of the region unlike many of your audience I would believe that there’s great trouble ahead and the US Gov should take action to curb these democratic processes which this report implies are threatening. In such a short article I don’t anticipate an in depth analysis but the buzz words and the slant get tedious. Happy Holidays cheers, jt