the full text is freely available without registration or limitations at the original URL?
What is the benefit of such a copyright violation? It damages the original site
(subtracting traffic, that is banner views) without any advantage for the end users
Why did you repost the whole article, when:
the terms of use (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/services/site/terms.html)
explicitly prohibit redistribution, and
the full text is freely available without registration or limitations at the original URL?
What is the benefit of such a copyright violation? It damages the original site
(subtracting traffic, that is banner views) without any advantage for the end users
Marco