...feels no need to hide that he’s making multiple posts, like others here.
Which means what?
(Now Haupt has invented a new category of guilt by association: guilt by IP.)
One of the biggest lies in Nico Haupt’s catalogue is that there is any conflict between the Ground Zero event planned for the morning of 9/11/05 and the afternoon march from Times Square starting at 1 pm.
The real people who are organizing the real Ground Zero action happen to be in agreement with the organizers of Times Square to co-participate, live and let live.
Note that in all his ranting above, Haupt does not specify a time for the Ground Zero action he supposedly promotes.
This is far less interesting to him than destroying and defaming others.
In fact, the real Ground Zero action (that morning at 8 am) is not being organized by Nico Haupt in any way.
(Haupt may be referring to the fictional action at "high noon" announced by WING-TV, a COINTELPRO-style group from Texas who have no organizers whatsoever in New York, and whose mission clearly is to poison the 9/11 truth movement with attacks on everyone from Alex Jones to 911Truth.org.)
The organizers of Times Square do have a problem with Ground Zero: it’s a memorial ceremony, and they want to leave the relatives be.
But the organizers of Times Square are not campaigning against the Ground Zero idea or urging anyone to boycott it.
Nor are the organizers of Ground Zero boycotting Times Square.
Ergo, the entire problem here is a fabrication of the fantasist Nico Haupt.
Given that most people read at a 5th grade level or better and understand self-contradicting bullshit when they read it, there is little need to answer Haupt’s 1,001 attempts to fabulate guilt by (tenuous) association, strawmen, and obvious lies.
His behavior has alienated him from almost everyone he ever worked politically with in real life, and he is left only with pretending to be a big man on the Internet.
One lie should be noted: 911Truth.org has never received funding or had any association directly or indirectly from any of the sources this, ahem, lying sack of shit has mentioned.
...feels no need to hide that he’s making multiple posts, like others here.
Which means what?
(Now Haupt has invented a new category of guilt by association: guilt by IP.)
One of the biggest lies in Nico Haupt’s catalogue is that there is any conflict between the Ground Zero event planned for the morning of 9/11/05 and the afternoon march from Times Square starting at 1 pm.
The real people who are organizing the real Ground Zero action happen to be in agreement with the organizers of Times Square to co-participate, live and let live.
Note that in all his ranting above, Haupt does not specify a time for the Ground Zero action he supposedly promotes.
This is far less interesting to him than destroying and defaming others.
In fact, the real Ground Zero action (that morning at 8 am) is not being organized by Nico Haupt in any way.
(Haupt may be referring to the fictional action at "high noon" announced by WING-TV, a COINTELPRO-style group from Texas who have no organizers whatsoever in New York, and whose mission clearly is to poison the 9/11 truth movement with attacks on everyone from Alex Jones to 911Truth.org.)
The organizers of Times Square do have a problem with Ground Zero: it’s a memorial ceremony, and they want to leave the relatives be.
But the organizers of Times Square are not campaigning against the Ground Zero idea or urging anyone to boycott it.
Nor are the organizers of Ground Zero boycotting Times Square.
Ergo, the entire problem here is a fabrication of the fantasist Nico Haupt.
Given that most people read at a 5th grade level or better and understand self-contradicting bullshit when they read it, there is little need to answer Haupt’s 1,001 attempts to fabulate guilt by (tenuous) association, strawmen, and obvious lies.
His behavior has alienated him from almost everyone he ever worked politically with in real life, and he is left only with pretending to be a big man on the Internet.
One lie should be noted: 911Truth.org has never received funding or had any association directly or indirectly from any of the sources this, ahem, lying sack of shit has mentioned.
And I speak here for myself only.
Nicholas Levis