I have asked this many times before and I will ask again here:
Are there any seismographs available from the nine eleven events?
Actually, I am sure there are and I am sure that some geologists have filtered and interperted this data but there doesn’t seem to be anyone wanting to speaking about it.
Think for a moment what they might show. If you think I am misleading the readers, recall the seismographs presented to the public about the Kursk (sp?) submaraine’s torpedo failure being recorded by the USGS — where it showed a small blip prior to a larger one relating to the explosion which sank the sub.
The USGS provided that and supporting evidence of past tested and recorded events to show colloration of what happenned. And sure enough when the divers visited the sub that is what they found.
Now if USGS (et al) can filter the data to track a torpedo malfunction in the Berents Sea (many thousands of miles away) then should they be able to provide data for what occurred on American Soil?
I have asked this many times before and I will ask again here:
Are there any seismographs available from the nine eleven events?
Actually, I am sure there are and I am sure that some geologists have filtered and interperted this data but there doesn’t seem to be anyone wanting to speaking about it.
Think for a moment what they might show. If you think I am misleading the readers, recall the seismographs presented to the public about the Kursk (sp?) submaraine’s torpedo failure being recorded by the USGS — where it showed a small blip prior to a larger one relating to the explosion which sank the sub.
The USGS provided that and supporting evidence of past tested and recorded events to show colloration of what happenned. And sure enough when the divers visited the sub that is what they found.
Now if USGS (et al) can filter the data to track a torpedo malfunction in the Berents Sea (many thousands of miles away) then should they be able to provide data for what occurred on American Soil?
Anyone have any thoughts on this?