> REPORT: Oman Trade Pact Permits Foreign Ownership Of US Nat’l Security Assets
21 July 2006, 03:21
Assets owned by other nations are appropriated through the debt of the U.S. government; this provision allows direct purchase of assets that are vital to the well being of the American society.
In some respects this is a good thing when considering that the world is headed towards a borderless existence and this will allow the haves to keep separate from the have-nots. We can already see the starting phases of "borderlessness" — the people who are most pro are business which wants cheap labor. The opposite side of this that it drives down the cost of labor of the native. Thus, Mexicans migrating north puts pressure on the U.S. citizen to compete for wage. Over time, as Mexico develops it’s infrastructure and the society evolves, U.S. citizens will be migrating down to compete for the same-level wages with the Mexician citizen.
It will reflect what has happenned to money (tokens of exchange) over the last twenty years in particular. The velocity of money has increased and it moves relatively freely between money centers. That is, it does not honor borders as it once did.
For a good understanding of this read up on the WTO or prior to it the 26 or annual meetings that were held, the last being the "Doha Talks" held in Qatar.
For those countries that are not part of this grand matrix, like Iraq, Iran, etc. well, they are (or will be) folded in by way of war. (One of the several major reasons for present wars that is not publisized or obious reasons.)
The many to many relationships for these wars and migration and labor-tasks (and above all the faith in some printed paper) is a complex matrix and many millions of man years have been spent in dissertations. It is not easy to expresss in a reply, let alone in available books. A person would go crazy in understanding all of it.
Assets owned by other nations are appropriated through the debt of the U.S. government; this provision allows direct purchase of assets that are vital to the well being of the American society.
In some respects this is a good thing when considering that the world is headed towards a borderless existence and this will allow the haves to keep separate from the have-nots. We can already see the starting phases of "borderlessness" — the people who are most pro are business which wants cheap labor. The opposite side of this that it drives down the cost of labor of the native. Thus, Mexicans migrating north puts pressure on the U.S. citizen to compete for wage. Over time, as Mexico develops it’s infrastructure and the society evolves, U.S. citizens will be migrating down to compete for the same-level wages with the Mexician citizen.
It will reflect what has happenned to money (tokens of exchange) over the last twenty years in particular. The velocity of money has increased and it moves relatively freely between money centers. That is, it does not honor borders as it once did.
For a good understanding of this read up on the WTO or prior to it the 26 or annual meetings that were held, the last being the "Doha Talks" held in Qatar.
For those countries that are not part of this grand matrix, like Iraq, Iran, etc. well, they are (or will be) folded in by way of war. (One of the several major reasons for present wars that is not publisized or obious reasons.)
The many to many relationships for these wars and migration and labor-tasks (and above all the faith in some printed paper) is a complex matrix and many millions of man years have been spent in dissertations. It is not easy to expresss in a reply, let alone in available books. A person would go crazy in understanding all of it.