Confused is not the point. The big picture which you missed no doubt from confusion is that as a writer you feel reading articles is of no value as the headline tells the story and one need not dive any deeper. I thought gone with the wind was a katrina flick, silly me I should have read the complete book not just the title. Before you get your dander up and start labeling me, take a minute and against your own better advice read the entire passage , I made it easy and did not include a headline to keep confusion to a low. I would think you want people to read your articles, would they benefit or gleen anything from just reading your headline? That is my point pure and simple no politics intended.
Confused is not the point. The big picture which you missed no doubt from confusion is that as a writer you feel reading articles is of no value as the headline tells the story and one need not dive any deeper. I thought gone with the wind was a katrina flick, silly me I should have read the complete book not just the title. Before you get your dander up and start labeling me, take a minute and against your own better advice read the entire passage , I made it easy and did not include a headline to keep confusion to a low. I would think you want people to read your articles, would they benefit or gleen anything from just reading your headline? That is my point pure and simple no politics intended.