Your "250 witnesses" aren’t witnesses if they don’t have firsthand knowledge, which they don’t. In my profession, trial lawyer, no intelligent judge would allow any of your "250 witnesses" to testify under oath in a court of law.
Now, not that it matters to you, but the 14 witnesses on the so-called other side are true witnesses b/c they actually witnessed the facts of which they speak. (Novel concept, eh?)
Now, after defaming Kerry’s Vietnam record based on fabricated testimony, you backtrack by claiming no interest in bush’s or kerry’s vietnam-era record. i suggest that you make this statement b/c you really have no interest in discussing bush’s record. fact is, bush hid behind daddy like a yellow-bellied coward to get his national guard assignment. of course you don’t want to discuss that history.
i, for one, believe kerry’s and bush’s histories are relevant, terribly relevant. kerry volunteered and fought, returned from vietnam and fought again to end the vietnam war mistake — 58,000 americans died for no good reason. bush, on the other hand, hid behind daddy, became a drunk (or was he a drunk before the national guard?), started businesses through daddy’s connections, ran those businesses into the ground, became president of the texas rangers through daddy’s connections and proceeded to make a cool $16,000,000 from the generosity of the taxpayers buying his team a stadium and land to build it on ...
no, little georgie boy is now, and has always been, a spoiled, rotten brat!!!
Your "250 witnesses" aren’t witnesses if they don’t have firsthand knowledge, which they don’t. In my profession, trial lawyer, no intelligent judge would allow any of your "250 witnesses" to testify under oath in a court of law.
Now, not that it matters to you, but the 14 witnesses on the so-called other side are true witnesses b/c they actually witnessed the facts of which they speak. (Novel concept, eh?)
Now, after defaming Kerry’s Vietnam record based on fabricated testimony, you backtrack by claiming no interest in bush’s or kerry’s vietnam-era record. i suggest that you make this statement b/c you really have no interest in discussing bush’s record. fact is, bush hid behind daddy like a yellow-bellied coward to get his national guard assignment. of course you don’t want to discuss that history.
i, for one, believe kerry’s and bush’s histories are relevant, terribly relevant. kerry volunteered and fought, returned from vietnam and fought again to end the vietnam war mistake — 58,000 americans died for no good reason. bush, on the other hand, hid behind daddy, became a drunk (or was he a drunk before the national guard?), started businesses through daddy’s connections, ran those businesses into the ground, became president of the texas rangers through daddy’s connections and proceeded to make a cool $16,000,000 from the generosity of the taxpayers buying his team a stadium and land to build it on ...
no, little georgie boy is now, and has always been, a spoiled, rotten brat!!!