What I would like to know is how Condoleeza Rice can explain away to the press that the serious doubts about whether the Iraq attempted to purchase aluminum tubes for nuclear weapons were resolved by her in favor of our safety so we can invade and occupy a foreign country, but at the same time, in her testimony before the 9/11 commission, she said that a memo which states "Bin Laden determined to Strike in U.S." is an historical document that can be completely ignored? Doesn’t she care what we think of her?
What I would like to know is how Condoleeza Rice can explain away to the press that the serious doubts about whether the Iraq attempted to purchase aluminum tubes for nuclear weapons were resolved by her in favor of our safety so we can invade and occupy a foreign country, but at the same time, in her testimony before the 9/11 commission, she said that a memo which states "Bin Laden determined to Strike in U.S." is an historical document that can be completely ignored? Doesn’t she care what we think of her?