I hate how every single reply I read, that’s defending Bush, has to attack the others. Nobody seems to be open to the fact that there are possibilities such as Bush having a transmitter. There is no reason to bash other opinions with foul language or closed minded opinions.
My belief is that it’s entirely possible for something like this. If anyone actually read about the Bush Administration’s doings, then people would realize that this administration has been up to very disgusting, scary, and unthinkable acts, and this microphone conspiracy falls into that category.
Here’s another justification for Bush being "fed" answers: he’s not talking like a rehearsed speaker. Everyone knew that the debate was on Iraq and such, and Bush was supposedly rehearsing all the angles with Karl Rove. Am I mistaken? What person, with rehearsed knowledge, needs ten seconds to entirely clear his mind, focus on the question, and come up with a clear response? Answer: nobody. I know absolutely no one who has to speak publicly, and is able to come up with a perfect sentence without stuttering. If you are one of those people, I would personally like to meet you.
From another side, not only were his hesitations entirely way too long (which suggests he was "collecting" every single thought OR he was listening to suggestions over an earpiece) but he always spoke in phrases many times, without stuttering. If this president cannot come up with a clear concise statement by himself, who’s to say that when he does, he’s not using aid to help him.
One last statement. If you think that Bush is a great president, you are horribly mistaken, for it is not he, but his adminstration working through him. If you need proof, read a book. I wouldn’t be surprised if you didn’t because then you’d be true followers of our forsaken president, for not even our great leader knows what’s current in the news.
First of all,
I hate how every single reply I read, that’s defending Bush, has to attack the others. Nobody seems to be open to the fact that there are possibilities such as Bush having a transmitter. There is no reason to bash other opinions with foul language or closed minded opinions.
My belief is that it’s entirely possible for something like this. If anyone actually read about the Bush Administration’s doings, then people would realize that this administration has been up to very disgusting, scary, and unthinkable acts, and this microphone conspiracy falls into that category.
Here’s another justification for Bush being "fed" answers: he’s not talking like a rehearsed speaker. Everyone knew that the debate was on Iraq and such, and Bush was supposedly rehearsing all the angles with Karl Rove. Am I mistaken? What person, with rehearsed knowledge, needs ten seconds to entirely clear his mind, focus on the question, and come up with a clear response? Answer: nobody. I know absolutely no one who has to speak publicly, and is able to come up with a perfect sentence without stuttering. If you are one of those people, I would personally like to meet you.
From another side, not only were his hesitations entirely way too long (which suggests he was "collecting" every single thought OR he was listening to suggestions over an earpiece) but he always spoke in phrases many times, without stuttering. If this president cannot come up with a clear concise statement by himself, who’s to say that when he does, he’s not using aid to help him.
One last statement. If you think that Bush is a great president, you are horribly mistaken, for it is not he, but his adminstration working through him. If you need proof, read a book. I wouldn’t be surprised if you didn’t because then you’d be true followers of our forsaken president, for not even our great leader knows what’s current in the news.