> Too many voting ’irregularities’ to be coincidence
6 November 2004, 03:02
Kerry , Mr "Help is on the Way" , didn’t say anything.
We thought that with those 10,000 lawyers he had on hand that something was going to be done to at least look into things before conceding to President Bush.
That appears to be a smokescreen, to give us false confidence. He is one of them, of course, nobody gets to run unless they pass the test of loyalty to the Elite who-ever-they-are-s.[NWO]
So did Kerry ever intend to win? Or was he chosen specially to run against Bush? Post-election action seems to show that he isn’t fighting to win.
The whole campaign was sorely short of good material. He could have used some of the material we all come across on the conspiracy of 9-11, for example "Why did building #7 fall down Mr President?"].
Or ties to Bin Laden family - which may be innocent, but it could have changed voters minds about Bush.
Or done some effort into showing the size of the deficit and debt and what that means for the next budget, and the long term.
Or why not - Micheal Moore? They say anyone who watched the film would not vote Bush - and that is something to look into - how many saw the movie VS how many voters chose Bush... albiet not all viewers voted, but if half the nation saw the film and none voted Boosh, then Bush got more votes than possible. Silly notion that could not be used obviously, just one more indication, irregularity, to be all coincidence.
So it was to be expected that Kerry would give in easily, with a fake show [the lawyers] of demands for honesty and clarity in the election results .
Kerry , Mr "Help is on the Way" , didn’t say anything.
We thought that with those 10,000 lawyers he had on hand that something was going to be done to at least look into things before conceding to President Bush.
That appears to be a smokescreen, to give us false confidence. He is one of them, of course, nobody gets to run unless they pass the test of loyalty to the Elite who-ever-they-are-s.[NWO]
So did Kerry ever intend to win? Or was he chosen specially to run against Bush? Post-election action seems to show that he isn’t fighting to win.
The whole campaign was sorely short of good material. He could have used some of the material we all come across on the conspiracy of 9-11, for example "Why did building #7 fall down Mr President?"].
Or ties to Bin Laden family - which may be innocent, but it could have changed voters minds about Bush.
Or done some effort into showing the size of the deficit and debt and what that means for the next budget, and the long term.
Or why not - Micheal Moore? They say anyone who watched the film would not vote Bush - and that is something to look into - how many saw the movie VS how many voters chose Bush... albiet not all viewers voted, but if half the nation saw the film and none voted Boosh, then Bush got more votes than possible. Silly notion that could not be used obviously, just one more indication, irregularity, to be all coincidence.
So it was to be expected that Kerry would give in easily, with a fake show [the lawyers] of demands for honesty and clarity in the election results .
A Canadian.