> Too many voting ’irregularities’ to be coincidence
6 November 2004, 08:27
Please... if you want the progressive cause to be taken seriously just admit an honest defeat. In any given election their are so many numbers/polls to be played with any number of coincidental data could look conspiratorial. Nevermind that Democrats themselves are hardly innocent of voter fraud, Nixon in Illinois in ’60 and John Thune in 2002 are pretty indisputable incidents of this, however much better for the progressive cause it might been for them to lose, it would be hard to say they lost honestly. But as long as the progressive cause is mired in this conspiratorial nonsense it will easily be dissmissed.
Please... if you want the progressive cause to be taken seriously just admit an honest defeat. In any given election their are so many numbers/polls to be played with any number of coincidental data could look conspiratorial. Nevermind that Democrats themselves are hardly innocent of voter fraud, Nixon in Illinois in ’60 and John Thune in 2002 are pretty indisputable incidents of this, however much better for the progressive cause it might been for them to lose, it would be hard to say they lost honestly. But as long as the progressive cause is mired in this conspiratorial nonsense it will easily be dissmissed.