> Too many voting ’irregularities’ to be coincidence-HELP!!!
9 November 2004, 20:21
I am not sure what it takes to make a case for election fraud - however, I always say "Keep it simple!"
The official value for election turnout is 52%. However, in my voting district, as in all, the sign in book that we sign prior to casting a vote WAS FULL!!!!!. What am I trying to say?
Take a random sample of the sign in books from different voting districts - any voting districts. THEY WILL BE FULL!!!!. The actual turnout was virtually 100%. You can see that this is not difficult to prove. The official value is 52%. You have a case of fraud right there.
The ratio of REGISTERED DEMOCRATS TO REPUBLICANS IS 10:1 NATIONWIDE. If turnout was virtually 100% you do the math!
I am not an attorney but what does it take to make a case for election fraud? Let’s do it ASAP!!!
Thanks.
twilightcity@aol.com
I am not sure what it takes to make a case for election fraud - however, I always say "Keep it simple!"
The official value for election turnout is 52%. However, in my voting district, as in all, the sign in book that we sign prior to casting a vote WAS FULL!!!!!. What am I trying to say?
Take a random sample of the sign in books from different voting districts - any voting districts. THEY WILL BE FULL!!!!. The actual turnout was virtually 100%. You can see that this is not difficult to prove. The official value is 52%. You have a case of fraud right there.
The ratio of REGISTERED DEMOCRATS TO REPUBLICANS IS 10:1 NATIONWIDE. If turnout was virtually 100% you do the math!
I am not an attorney but what does it take to make a case for election fraud? Let’s do it ASAP!!!
Thanks.
twilightcity@aol.com