Home > ... > Forum 10093

> Sibel Edmonds: Still Silenced, But Why?

6 January 2005, 01:12

I personaly have never believed that the US government was complicit in the action of the bombing of the World Trade Center.

There are many things the US government at all levels has been and is complicit in, that this seems a red herring to me. Something to distract us from reality, to further an illusion prompted by the present actors in the government and which again we all seem to be falling under.

I have heard Sibil Edmonds on Democracy Now. She has spoken of seeing documents before 911 that tell of such potential activity.

That this was covered up and ignored seems as valid to me as the ignoring of the warnings of the tidal wave that hit so many nations, nations that had advance warnings that were ignored.

It is a matter of both incompetence, and that this has not happened before.

The fact that Bush did nothing after the first tower was hit, and the military did nothing after the first tower was hit, seems to me far more damning.

At least they knew the tower was hit, and an early warning system against attack was in place, yet nothing was done to stop the second plane.

Who make the decision to knock out a plane full of people of course.

But if they saw it getting closer and closer, which they must have, why did they not hit it then. They were afraid if would fall over New York City and do damage?

Possible.

Was there a moment, where it was not over the city, and they decided it was going to hit the tower?

None of these questions it seems to me have been adequately answered.

Secrecy is of course always at the governments defense.

That we allow the continuation of secrecy in governments is to our own detriment as democracies, and as free people of the world, and is proving the demise of such freedom.

What would happen if the story was disclosed?

Are there a few people who would be in danger? Get them back to the US.

Are there some nations, which means some leaders, who would be damaged?

The US by not having truth is sinking further and futher into complete totalitarianism.

But with election fraud, the appointment of a President, for the second time, all this is really mute.

The Empire is here. It began sometime in early 2000 when Florida was determined to go to Bush. It will continue for many more years.

Anyone who understands the message below will understand much. Only in passing should one think of Bush. What the message truly signifies is the passing of the world’s present most powerful nation.

It was written, long, long time ago.

The quote:

A king sits upon a throne; behind him stands a figure veiled in black

It signifies one who will suffer misfortune in the height of his career and whose fall will be dangerous in proportion to the height he has attained. The native will be too apt to depend on his own powers and will essay feats which will be beyond his natural powers. Ambition will lead him into dangerous positions, and at a weak moment he will fall. Let this be taken as equally affecting his physical, moral, and social welfare.

Sepharial’s translation of La Volasfera, Taurus 23