> Madrid Fire Re-opens 9/11 Questions: Why did the twin towers fall so fast?
14 February 2005, 05:49
You are not a traitor - the traitors are in the White House!!
This is just another sample of the avalanche of evidence to show that 911 was an inside-job orchestrated by Israeli-dominated factions within the US administration.
Both Madrid and the wtc fires are reported to have burned at around 800degC - steel melts at around 1500degC. The WTC towers (110 stories) were needing to be immensely stronger than the madrid tower (approx 35 stories), yet both WTC towers collapsed in about one hour, completely, in a uniform and controlled way, straight down, in free-fall time (approx 10 secs) - ie: no resistance, regardless of no fires on any lower floors, and of the immense central columm of re-inforced concrete and steel, and of the outer structural skeletal wall of hundreds of steel support beams. IF --- IF any steel did melt, then it would have caused an asymetrical localised failure within one or two floors - which could not have resulted in the whole structure coming down. These, and the WTC building 7 were controlled demolitons folks.
The Madrid tower did not collapse even after 17 hours.
Forget about what the media say about fabricatedn whitewashed "enquiries" and reports from the "Government".
You are not a traitor - the traitors are in the White House!!
This is just another sample of the avalanche of evidence to show that 911 was an inside-job orchestrated by Israeli-dominated factions within the US administration.
Both Madrid and the wtc fires are reported to have burned at around 800degC - steel melts at around 1500degC. The WTC towers (110 stories) were needing to be immensely stronger than the madrid tower (approx 35 stories), yet both WTC towers collapsed in about one hour, completely, in a uniform and controlled way, straight down, in free-fall time (approx 10 secs) - ie: no resistance, regardless of no fires on any lower floors, and of the immense central columm of re-inforced concrete and steel, and of the outer structural skeletal wall of hundreds of steel support beams. IF --- IF any steel did melt, then it would have caused an asymetrical localised failure within one or two floors - which could not have resulted in the whole structure coming down. These, and the WTC building 7 were controlled demolitons folks.
The Madrid tower did not collapse even after 17 hours.
Forget about what the media say about fabricatedn whitewashed "enquiries" and reports from the "Government".