> Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And "Inside Job"
18 June 2005, 03:23
According to 9-11 research.com, three proofs of evidence concerning the demolition of the twin towers are:
1 The towers fell faster than they could have if they were crushing themselves.
2 The volume of dust was too great to have been the product of a gravity-driven collapse.
3 The South Tower’s top shattered before falling, and so its breakup was not a result of gravity-driven crushing.
To learn more about these, log on to the above website.
Oh, and one last teeny, tiny thing — let’s all try to keep an open mind. Hardly any of us, myself included, are experts who can verify or denounce much of stuff." Maybe this was an "inside job" or maybe it wasn’t —I truly don’t know. But how can anyone ever find out what happened if they aren’t listening to every side of the story? Present any case to yourself as unemotionally as possible if truth is what you want.
According to 9-11 research.com, three proofs of evidence concerning the demolition of the twin towers are:
1 The towers fell faster than they could have if they were crushing themselves.
2 The volume of dust was too great to have been the product of a gravity-driven collapse.
3 The South Tower’s top shattered before falling, and so its breakup was not a result of gravity-driven crushing.
To learn more about these, log on to the above website.
Oh, and one last teeny, tiny thing — let’s all try to keep an open mind. Hardly any of us, myself included, are experts who can verify or denounce much of stuff." Maybe this was an "inside job" or maybe it wasn’t —I truly don’t know. But how can anyone ever find out what happened if they aren’t listening to every side of the story? Present any case to yourself as unemotionally as possible if truth is what you want.