> WTC Basement Blast And Injured Burn Victim Blows ’Official 9/11 Story’ Sky High
27 October 2006, 00:59
1. if true, why aren’t the democrats, who are literally screaming to get bush out of office, exposing this? what a perfect way for them to gain power at the expense of the republicans. and don’t say that they are in it too, as the 2 groups never get along, especially when power is involved.
2. an impact at the top of a structure, just like one at one end, can be felt at the bottom or at the other end simultaneously.
3. in a controlled demolition when using explosives to cause implosion, the effect is immediate, there is no lag time from explosion to implosion. if there was a controlled demolition to implode the towers they would have fallen instantly, not 10s of minutes later.
4. in a controlled implosion, the set up involving the placement of explosives, running the detonaters, cables, etc. would have been noticed by someone, somewhere at some time. also, in such a scenario, the situation is highly unstable and must be cafefully controlled to avoid premature detonation.
5. a plane full of jet fuel crashing into a tower can cause a blast of burning fuel to be propelled down elevator shafts, stairwells, air conditioning/heating ducts, service tubes, etc. physics proves this.
6. the videos clearly show the towers collapsing from the top down. all of the videos do.
7. not one person around the towers has said anything about ground tremors prior to the planes hitting the towers.
8. the u.s. geological intruments that monitor earthquakes and abnormalities in the ground recorded nothing prior to the planes hitting the towers. remember, these instruments are very sensitive.
9. and, if true, far too many people of many different nationalities, political beliefs, religious beliefs, and positions in government and the private sector would have to be of such a purely evil nature as to all conspire and perform what you say. the law of probabilities makes it impossible to lend any kind of rationality to the scenario you present.
so, therefore i must be rational instead of irrational and believe what the government, press, video (both media and private), and eyewitnesses have told us.
1. if true, why aren’t the democrats, who are literally screaming to get bush out of office, exposing this? what a perfect way for them to gain power at the expense of the republicans. and don’t say that they are in it too, as the 2 groups never get along, especially when power is involved.
2. an impact at the top of a structure, just like one at one end, can be felt at the bottom or at the other end simultaneously.
3. in a controlled demolition when using explosives to cause implosion, the effect is immediate, there is no lag time from explosion to implosion. if there was a controlled demolition to implode the towers they would have fallen instantly, not 10s of minutes later.
4. in a controlled implosion, the set up involving the placement of explosives, running the detonaters, cables, etc. would have been noticed by someone, somewhere at some time. also, in such a scenario, the situation is highly unstable and must be cafefully controlled to avoid premature detonation.
5. a plane full of jet fuel crashing into a tower can cause a blast of burning fuel to be propelled down elevator shafts, stairwells, air conditioning/heating ducts, service tubes, etc. physics proves this.
6. the videos clearly show the towers collapsing from the top down. all of the videos do.
7. not one person around the towers has said anything about ground tremors prior to the planes hitting the towers.
8. the u.s. geological intruments that monitor earthquakes and abnormalities in the ground recorded nothing prior to the planes hitting the towers. remember, these instruments are very sensitive.
9. and, if true, far too many people of many different nationalities, political beliefs, religious beliefs, and positions in government and the private sector would have to be of such a purely evil nature as to all conspire and perform what you say. the law of probabilities makes it impossible to lend any kind of rationality to the scenario you present.
so, therefore i must be rational instead of irrational and believe what the government, press, video (both media and private), and eyewitnesses have told us.