> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
12 August 2005, 14:04
Don’t know how old you guys are or what information you’re getting, but you’ve managed to argue and write about 10 strings to this message on snippets and hearsay. You both claim the other has lost grip on reality and your both right.
1. You say it’s ’inadequate’ that it took the UK authorities so long to release ID’s for all the victims, compared to Madrid. Well no s*it Sherlock. The investigators are working underground, in a confined tunnel, among broken metal and bits of bodies, in 40C temperatures whilst trying to get enough evidence together to make a secure conviction aginst the perpetrators of this atrocity. So yes it did take a long time to ID the body parts in these conditions, and yes during a complex investigation the story will change as new evidence comes to light.
Your friend says he doesn’t beleive that the suspects were responisble for the bombings because a) he hasn’t seen pictures of them getting on the trains (if he had wouldn’t he argue that photos can be manipulated) & that b) all the bombs went off together: ’have you ever heard of terrorist using a time fuse’ (Yes explosives wired to a mobile to detonate the bombs. This is what happened in Madrid)
Do you think the above is a realistic consideration of the facts?
2. The original message that started the string was ludicrous for the reasons given: That the US government must have perpatrated the 9-11 attacks because ’it is IMPOSSIBLE for the buildings hit by a jet airliner to come down in 13 seconds’
Are you an architect or civil engineer? Do you have a firm grasp of the physics of the skyscraper or the structural consequences of an impact of a jet airliner full of fuel? They didn’t come down in 13 seconds, they burned for a consdierable time before they collapsed. Much to the discomfort of the 1000s of people trapped in the building.
I’m not one of those people who blindly beleive that you must take the information given to you at face value or rally round the flag in ’blind patriotism’ when bad things happen.. but guys think about these things from a human level and don’t draw theories from newspaper reports or websites which you already discredit as minformation. Maybe the conspiracy theory phenomenon is a conspriracy: distracting us from the real issues and asking the hard questions that produce the violence in society today.. maybe I’m conspiring to conspire you into spreading that message. It goes round in circles!
Why not look at why 4 British Citizens of Pakistani origin decided that this country was so bad that instead of moving away to a place where life was more tolerable for them, they instead decided to kill themselves and 54 innocent people around them in a grusome, agonising and undignified way... That is a much harder question to answer than the conjecture and consipiracy that you guys are advocating and that would be an issue worth having a 10 string argument about... ;-)
Don’t know how old you guys are or what information you’re getting, but you’ve managed to argue and write about 10 strings to this message on snippets and hearsay. You both claim the other has lost grip on reality and your both right.
1. You say it’s ’inadequate’ that it took the UK authorities so long to release ID’s for all the victims, compared to Madrid. Well no s*it Sherlock. The investigators are working underground, in a confined tunnel, among broken metal and bits of bodies, in 40C temperatures whilst trying to get enough evidence together to make a secure conviction aginst the perpetrators of this atrocity. So yes it did take a long time to ID the body parts in these conditions, and yes during a complex investigation the story will change as new evidence comes to light.
Your friend says he doesn’t beleive that the suspects were responisble for the bombings because a) he hasn’t seen pictures of them getting on the trains (if he had wouldn’t he argue that photos can be manipulated) & that b) all the bombs went off together: ’have you ever heard of terrorist using a time fuse’ (Yes explosives wired to a mobile to detonate the bombs. This is what happened in Madrid)
Do you think the above is a realistic consideration of the facts?
2. The original message that started the string was ludicrous for the reasons given: That the US government must have perpatrated the 9-11 attacks because ’it is IMPOSSIBLE for the buildings hit by a jet airliner to come down in 13 seconds’
Are you an architect or civil engineer? Do you have a firm grasp of the physics of the skyscraper or the structural consequences of an impact of a jet airliner full of fuel? They didn’t come down in 13 seconds, they burned for a consdierable time before they collapsed. Much to the discomfort of the 1000s of people trapped in the building.
I’m not one of those people who blindly beleive that you must take the information given to you at face value or rally round the flag in ’blind patriotism’ when bad things happen.. but guys think about these things from a human level and don’t draw theories from newspaper reports or websites which you already discredit as minformation. Maybe the conspiracy theory phenomenon is a conspriracy: distracting us from the real issues and asking the hard questions that produce the violence in society today.. maybe I’m conspiring to conspire you into spreading that message. It goes round in circles!
Why not look at why 4 British Citizens of Pakistani origin decided that this country was so bad that instead of moving away to a place where life was more tolerable for them, they instead decided to kill themselves and 54 innocent people around them in a grusome, agonising and undignified way... That is a much harder question to answer than the conjecture and consipiracy that you guys are advocating and that would be an issue worth having a 10 string argument about... ;-)