I note a considerable looseness of thinking in the way people flop back and forth between attributing terrorism to Islam, claiming it to be a religion that endorses atrocity, and attributing it to people upset about territorial issues which target people who happen mostly to be muslims. I recognise the greater sophistication with which Xtian theorists have distorted the teachings of the mystics claimed as their founders, which is perhaps how they managed to camouflage better their atrocities. If by their fruits ye shall know them, one must recognise that far more strange fruit has appeared on Xtian trees than muslim over the last few hundred years. Muslim fundamentalism is as much a danger to the cultures in which it is propagated as Xtian fundamentalism is to America the only place where large numbers of people are easily persuaded of the righteousness of hi-tech genocide , but until it was adopted as an instrument of destabilisation by the NWO see the origins of the Taliban it was not a particularly serious threat to humanity at large or to other countries that left it alone.
It is almost as simple as this - the Anglo-American elite has done everything it could to provoke and demonise the people who inhabit the lands where the resources they covet are located. If Islam is making the classic error of a religion endorsing a political perspective, at least it is drawing its broad-base support from the natural spirit of self-defense that an invaded and threatened populace must be expected to show.
If several generations from now our descendants are able to look back on the age of the global corporate cancer from a world in which that mostrosity has been expunged, they will perhaps see the muslims of the early 21st century as having, in a manner not as gentlemanly as might
have been desired, been among the first to take up arms against a menace to life on this earth that would have been brought down long before, had humans been more prescient.
It obscures the reality to describe the growing willingness among muslims to kill and be killed as an impulse deriving from their religion, even if the mullahs endorse it. It arises from their desire
to do something for their People, not for their Religion. In contrast, it’s hard to imagine many of the armed youngsters in American and British uniforms as being impelled by any such deepseated motives, or seriously believing that their cause is just or noble, however reflexively they may mouth the cliches of televidiotic patriotism. Their ultimate defeat is implicit in the fact that they are coming to realise what immoral masters they are serving, and must choose between shame and
denial...
I note a considerable looseness of thinking in the way people flop back and forth between attributing terrorism to Islam, claiming it to be a religion that endorses atrocity, and attributing it to people upset about territorial issues which target people who happen mostly to be muslims. I recognise the greater sophistication with which Xtian theorists have distorted the teachings of the mystics claimed as their founders, which is perhaps how they managed to camouflage better their atrocities. If by their fruits ye shall know them, one must recognise that far more strange fruit has appeared on Xtian trees than muslim over the last few hundred years. Muslim fundamentalism is as much a danger to the cultures in which it is propagated as Xtian fundamentalism is to America
the only place where large numbers of people are easily persuaded of the righteousness of hi-tech genocide , but until it was adopted as an instrument of destabilisation by the NWO see the origins of the Taliban it was not a particularly serious threat to humanity at large or to other countries that left it alone.
It is almost as simple as this - the Anglo-American elite has done everything it could to provoke and demonise the people who inhabit the lands where the resources they covet are located. If Islam is making the classic error of a religion endorsing a political perspective, at least it is drawing its broad-base support from the natural spirit of self-defense that an invaded and threatened populace must be expected to show.
If several generations from now our descendants are able to look back on the age of the global corporate cancer from a world in which that mostrosity has been expunged, they will perhaps see the muslims of the early 21st century as having, in a manner not as gentlemanly as might
have been desired, been among the first to take up arms against a menace to life on this earth that would have been brought down long before, had humans been more prescient.
It obscures the reality to describe the growing willingness among muslims to kill and be killed as an impulse deriving from their religion, even if the mullahs endorse it. It arises from their desire
to do something for their People, not for their Religion. In contrast, it’s hard to imagine many of the armed youngsters in American and British uniforms as being impelled by any such deepseated motives, or seriously believing that their cause is just or noble, however reflexively they may mouth the cliches of televidiotic patriotism. Their ultimate defeat is implicit in the fact that they are coming to realise what immoral masters they are serving, and must choose between shame and
denial...