Home > ... > Forum 29144

> THE INCOMPETENT CONSPIRACY

4 November 2005, 13:31

Who gives a shit what Michael Moore owns? Does he run the country? Is he in an elected public official with access to public revenues? Is he responsible for allocating huge Federal Government contracts? The answer to all these questions is an emphatic no.
This writer with the World Net Daily obviously agrees with the many neocon simps who believe Michael Moore is an icon of the ’loony left’ and by trashing him they believe that the momentum of this now ever growing anti-war movement will slow down or even cease.
The anti-war movement isn’t about celebrities, my mentally challenged necon Moon Bats. The anti-war movement is about ideals, ancient ideals, the ideals that created the American Revolution. Ideals are impossible to trash, but for the typical neocon simp it is much easier to smear people, even if they are irrelevant to the issues on hand. Trashing, smearing, coughing up irrelevancies, constantly using emotional appeals to buttress their weak arguments. That’s how most of these neocon simps think.

Most of the people I know [all of us are anti-war, most of us are military veterans] couldn’t care less who and what Michael Moore represents. We don’t hold him up on some kind of pedestal. I personally haven’t seen any of his movies. I personally think his intellectual equipment is deficient, on par with the necons. If I were to rely on Mr. Moore’s criticisms of this administration, I wouldn’t have aligned myself with the anti-war movement in the first place, for I find him likely to use very much the same sort of tactics, bullshit really, that the necons use when they ’debate’. The first article in this blog, written by Ms. Benderman is all about independent thinking, for crying out loud, a mindset which the typical reactionary Neanderthal cannot fathom. This second article’s main thrust denies the first article’s premise. I suppose Ms. Benderman is trying to show how objective she is, with these two articles; all she shows me is her schizophrenic tendencies, something I believe is afflicting the entire American journalistic profession. Let’s try to stay focused on the prize, Ms. Benderman. Either you believe that the majority of the American people can think independently, or you don’t. Without independent thought, a democracy becomes an amorphous mob, who bow down to any demogogue that comes down the pike. I suggest that whenever you see your shrink, tell him that ’Nardil’ be your required medication.

Reactionaries cannot think independently, they need icons to look up to. They need guidance, a central mind to give them direction, they are eternally 16 years old. The vast majority of the people who are against this war made up their minds without the use of the mass media, who are nothing but a Propaganda Ministry, who for years supported this war, and still do, despite this administration’s current unpopularity, waving the red, white and blue after every report coming out of the Middle East. Unike the reactionary, unthinking mob, we did our homework every night, we did our own research, we did not rely on celebrities, like Moore, to do it for us. So, get this straight, my little neocon simps:
We do not need icons. We do not need guidance. We are mature adults who can make up our own minds without anyone else’s help, thank you very much, and we would like to keep it that way. One way to keep our independence of thought, as well as our sanity, is to call out the horseshit, such as this last article by Ms. Benderman, when we see it. We approach reality with reason and logic, we don’t character assassinate, we don’t obfuscate life and death issues with utter bullshit, & we don’t attempt to use irrelevant celebrities to hide the obvious corruption of our political leaders.