Click here to Bellaciao V.3.0 !

Archives Bellaciao EN - 2003-2016 Archives : FR | IT | ES

Documenting a Lie by George Tenet Before the 9/11 Commission

Friday 27 January 2006

Michael Wright — Norman, Oklahoma, USA —

In this post I list five important lies, related to the 9/11 attack, which have
been told by officials. Then I give links to other posts which document
the fact that these are lies:

One of the five lies was by George Tenet. It is on video, and was told during a March 2005 speech at the University of Oklahoma, where his mentor David Boren is president. In response to a question from me he disputed a TIME magazine article reporting that in August 2001, when Minneapolis FBI agents were being obstructed in their request for a warrant to search Moussaoui’s laptop, the CIA told the FBI headquarters that Moussaoui was not an Al Qaeda member.

Tenet told another lie in his April 2004 testimony before the 9/11 Commission ( which also has lied). This lie was to deny that he had any meetings with George Bush in August 2001. See chapter of the 9/11 Commission report. It is on page 262:

It confirms meetings between Bush and Tenet in August 2001. Then it says that Tenet "does not recall any discussions with the President of the domestic threat during this period."

The Commission was lying to protect Tenet from a perjury charge. In fact, he did
have a recollection of the period. His memory was not impaired. The "do not recall"
defense is bogus. He lied under oath. Tenet denied any meetings with Bush about
ANYTHING in August 2001. See pages 42-43 of this transcript of his testimony:

Why was Tenet lying about this? Most likely he was trying to distance himself from responsibility for the August 6 CIA briefing to Bush. This memo incorporated the erroneous expectation that any hijacked airliners would be landed for negotiation over demands — not crashed into buildings. Here is that memo:

Forum posts

  • Michel I agree with the other poster that your story requires some thinking and investigating. Here is an idea for a simple story:

    Demolishioners are crooks!

    The collapse of the three WTC buildings shows that it is much easier to take down buildings than demolishioners make us believe. Three steel towers came down neatly by just weakening their structures in a few spots. In a normal controlled demolition people spend weeks to place charges on every junction of steel beams all over the building. This is now proven to be unnecessary. Towers 1&2 experienced damage to supporting structures in very different and few spots and still came down perfectly. It is not even clear were in building 7 supporting beams were weakened, still it came down as neatly as in a old fashioned controlled demolition. This proofs that by picking only a few spots in a smart way it must be possible to take down any steel building in a controlled fashion.

    I patent this idea and go in the demolition business!