Home > More Proof that Bush is delusional re: Iraq’s "free" elections
More Proof that Bush is delusional re: Iraq’s "free" elections
by Open-Publishing - Friday 28 January 20051 comment
International Elections-Elected USA
My friend from Baquba visited me yesterday. He brought the usual giant lunch of home cooked food he always brings when he comes to see me. I’m still eating it, actually. I had it again for dinner tonight. Ah, the typical Iraqi meal.
He owns four large tents, and rents them to people in his city to use at funeral wakes, marriage parties, tribal negotiation meetings and to cover gardens, among other things.
During the Anglo-American invasion of his country back in the spring of 2003, when refugees from Baghdad sought shelter from the falling bombs, many of the families inundated his city. After his house was filled with refugees, he let others use his tents, for free of course.
Refugees from Fallujah are using them now.
At least 35 US soldiers have died in Iraq today. 31 of them died when a Chinook went down near the Jordanian border. At least four others died in clashes in the al-Anbar province. A patrol on the airport road was bombed, destroying at least one military vehicle. The military hasn’t released any casualty figures on that one yet.
“Bring ‘em on,” said George Bush quite some time ago, when the Iraqi resistance had begun to pick up the pace.
Today, during a press conference he spoke about the upcoming elections in Iraq.
“Clearly there are some who are intimidated,” he said, “I urge alls (not a typo) people to vote.”
Let me describe the scene on the ground here in “liberated” Iraq.
With the “elections” just three days away, people are terrified. Families are fleeing Baghdad much as they did prior to the invasion of the country. Seeking refuge from what everyone fears to be a massive onslaught of violence in the capital city, huge lines of cars are stacked up at checkpoints on the outer edges of the city.
Policemen and Iraqi soldiers are trying to convince people to stay in the city and vote.
Nobody is listening to them.
Whereas Baghdad is filled with Fallujah refugees, now villages and smaller cities on the outskirts of Baghdad are filling up with election refugees.
Yet these places aren’t safe either. In Baquba attacks on polling stations are a near daily occurrence. Mortar attacks are common on polling stations even as far south as Basra. A truck bomb struck a Kurdish political party headquarters in a small town near Mosul, killing 15 people, wounding twice that many. A string of car bombs detonated at polling stations in Kirkuk, which was already under an 8pm-5am curfew, killing 10 Iraqis.
Here in Baghdad, although the High Commission for Elections in Iraq has yet to announce their locations, schools which are being converted into polling stations are already being attacked.
Iraqis who live near these schools are terrorized at the prospect.
“They can block the whole city and people cannot move,” says a man speaking to me on condition of anonymity, “The city is dead, the people are dead. For what? For these forced elections!”
He is angry and frustrated because his street is now blocked as he lives near a small yellow middle school that is going to be used as a polling station.
Nearby some US soldiers are occupying a police station, as usual. One of them saw me taking photos and tried to confiscate my camera.
It didn’t matter that I showed him my press badge. After some talking he let me delete the photos and move on, camera in hand.
Sand barriers block the end of a street, the school where the insides are already in disrepair sits just behind them.
At least 90 streets in Baghdad are now closed down by huge sand and/or concrete barriers and razor wire. The number is growing daily.
“Now I’m afraid mortars will hit my home if the polling station is attacked,” he adds. He’ll be moving across town to stay at a relative’s house, which is not near one of the dreaded polling stations.
An owner of a small grocery shop nearby is just as concerned. He had to negotiate with soldiers to have them leave an opening on the end of the barrier so people could access his place of business.
“I’m already living off my food ration, and have little business,” he says while pointing at the deserted street, “Now who wants to come near my shop? All of us are afraid, and all of us are suffering now.”
A tired looking guard standing nearby named Salman chimes in on the conversation. “I would be crazy to vote, it’s so dangerous now,” he says with a cigarette dangling from his hand, “Besides, why vote? Of course Allawi will stay in. The Americans will make it so.”
A contact of mine just returned from spending a week in Fallujah. We shared some of the food brought from my friend in Baquba.
“I’d been in Fallujah for a week and all I’d seen was tough military tactics,” he tells me, “They are arresting people and putting them in these trucks, blindfolded and tied up. Everywhere I looked all I saw was utter devastation.”
He spoke with many families who told him one horror story after another, death after death after death.
“Then today, the military brings in a dozen Humvees and ground troops to basically seal off a small area near a market,” he continues, “In the middle of them is a CNN camera crew filming troops throwing candy to kids and these guys in orange vests start cleaning the streets around them.”
He laughs while holding up his arms and says, “I’d never seen those guys anywhere in the city before. I don’t know where they came from.”
After a pause to take a drink of soda he adds, “I’d never seen any boots on the ground at all, and all of the sudden there are all these marines standing around like everything was ok. It was the first time I’d seen any soldier not in a Humvee or a Bradley. I was really surprised.”
“All of it was 100% staged. Good PR before the election,” he says. Then in a reference to mainstream America he adds, “Fallujah is fine, now go back to sleep.”
Forum posts
2 February 2005, 03:22
THE BUSH administration and its media cheerleaders will declare the “dawning of democracy” in Iraq no matter what happens with the election result. They hope that enough Iraqis manage to cast ballots that the results lend legitimacy to the U.S. occupation of Iraq.
But the elections have nothing whatsoever to do with democracy.
U.S. generals claim that the residents of only four of Iraq’s 18 provinces were not able to “fully participate” in the voting. Good news, until you sit down with the population statistics and realize—as the generals all know—that those four provinces contain more than half of the population of Iraq.
No one who opposes the U.S. government’s war on the Iraqi people should accept that these elections are remotely legitimate. Observers didn’t even set foot in Iraq—but will remain safe in Amman, Jordan, apparently relying on reports from U.S. forces to determine if the vote was fair or corrupt.
But the truth is that the entire election process was corrupted—by U.S. occupiers determined that the vote should serve Washington’s interests. In return for allowing them to be held, the U.S. arranged for the elections to decide little. The main job of the 275-seat Transitional National Assembly elected on January 30 will be to draw up a new constitution that will lead to elections for yet another government in 10 months.
In all likelihood, Washington is not in immediate danger of being told to leave by a democratically elected Iraqi government.
The U.S. has an agenda in Iraq that rules out genuine expressions of democracy. For one, it wants to control Iraq’s vast oil reserves—the world’s second largest. Iraq is also central to the Bush administration’s vision of expanded American empire in the Middle East—the future home to a network of a dozen military bases, according to the plans of Pentagon hawks.
Washington oversaw in Vietnam in the 1960s and El Salvador in 1982.
The purpose of these elections—organized, financed and choreographed by the United States—was to persuade U.S. citizens and especially Congress that we were invading these countries and supporting a savage war against government opponents at the invitation of a legitimate, freely elected government, The main purpose of a demonstration election is to legitimize an invasion and occupation, not to choose a new government, or in the case of the US election to legitimize a crooked corporate puppet.