Home > How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

by Open-Publishing - Sunday 19 March 2006
8 comments

Trade-Exchange Rates International USA

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man:
How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

We speak with John Perkins, a former respected member of the international banking community. In his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man he describes how as a highly paid professional, he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then take over their economies. [includes rush transcript]

John Perkins describes himself as a former economic hit man - a highly paid professional who cheated countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. 20 years ago Perkins began writing a book with the working title, "Conscience of an Economic Hit Men."

Perkins writes, "The book was to be dedicated to the presidents of two countries, men who had been his clients whom I respected and thought of as kindred spirits - Jaime Roldós, president of Ecuador, and Omar Torrijos, president of Panama. Both had just died in fiery crashes. Their deaths were not accidental. They were assassinated because they opposed that fraternity of corporate, government, and banking heads whose goal is global empire. We Economic Hit Men failed to bring Roldós and Torrijos around, and the other type of hit men, the CIA-sanctioned jackals who were always right behind us, stepped in.

John Perkins goes on to write: "I was persuaded to stop writing that book. I started it four more times during the next twenty years. On each occasion, my decision to begin again was influenced by current world events: the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1980, the first Gulf War, Somalia, and the rise of Osama bin Laden. However, threats or bribes always convinced me to stop."

But now Perkins has finally published his story. The book is titled Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. John Perkins joins us now in our Firehouse studios.

John Perkins, from 1971 to 1981 he worked for the international consulting firm of Chas T. Main where he was a self-described "economic hit man." He is the author of the new book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.
RUSH TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is available free of charge, however donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...

AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins joins us now in our firehouse studio. Welcome to Democracy Now!

JOHN PERKINS: Thank you, Amy. It’s great to be here.

AMY GOODMAN: It’s good to have you with us. Okay, explain this term, “economic hit man,” e.h.m., as you call it.

JOHN PERKINS: Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring — to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we’ve been very successful. We’ve built the largest empire in the history of the world. It’s been done over the last 50 years since World War II with very little military might, actually. It’s only in rare instances like Iraq where the military comes in as a last resort. This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that.

AMY GOODMAN: How did you become one? Who did you work for?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, I was initially recruited while I was in business school back in the late sixties by the National Security Agency, the nation’s largest and least understood spy organization; but ultimately I worked for private corporations. The first real economic hit man was back in the early 1950’s, Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of Teddy, who overthrew of government of Iran, a democratically elected government, Mossadegh’s government who was Time’s magazine person of the year; and he was so successful at doing this without any bloodshed — well, there was a little bloodshed, but no military intervention, just spending millions of dollars and replaced Mossadegh with the Shah of Iran. At that point, we understood that this idea of economic hit man was an extremely good one. We didn’t have to worry about the threat of war with Russia when we did it this way. The problem with that was that Roosevelt was a C.I.A. agent. He was a government employee. Had he been caught, we would have been in a lot of trouble. It would have been very embarrassing. So, at that point, the decision was made to use organizations like the C.I.A. and the N.S.A. to recruit potential economic hit men like me and then send us to work for private consulting companies, engineering firms, construction companies, so that if we were caught, there would be no connection with the government.

Continue to read:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/09/1526251

Forum posts

  • ANYONE IN THE BANKING COMMUNITY, LIKE INVESTMENT BANKERS, CANNOT US THE WORD RESPECED. HIS HIT MAN STATUS PROVES THAT THESIS. YOU ARE ASKING PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THAT HE IS DOING THIS OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF HIS HEART. WAKE UP. FURTHER, AS LLONG AS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE WHAT THEY WANT AND ARE CONTENTED, THEY COULD CARE LESS ABUT HOW WHAT THEY BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE ENTITLED TO CAME ABOUT TO THEM. AMERICANS HAVE MORALS WHEN THEIR HIP POCKET THEIR HIP POCKET IS EMPTY. WAKE UP.

    • Please do two things:

      1. STOP SHOUTING!

      2. Construct complete sentences, with properly spellt words, and a grammatical structure.

      Maybe then, people will listen to you. At the moment, you appear to me to be a shouting idiot, who cannot keep his concentration for even a single sentence. This is not meant as an insult, but as a piece of friendly advice, because you seem to be trying to talk sense.

    • Most web blog issues seem to have 1% common-sense, 98% radicalism, and 1% who act above the other 99%. They prefer to correct spelling, syntax, and grammar and to offer advice. I sense either academic infiltration or right-wing disinformation, both of which tend to dilute or to minimize all responses. I suggest to those of you who do that you pay more attention to the Fourth Reich Amerika arising and less on fairyland academics.

    • Oh, yes. Never begin a sentence with: IT or MAYBE, and avoid "seem to be" and THEN. Perhaps your advice would be genuine.

    • SPELLT does not exist in the English language. Perhaps you meant SPELT, and follow your own advice before you attempt to correct me again.

    • Take note of the stricture of this web cite. Take care who you address or intimate as an idiot. Your reply seems to mirror the one from Ohio which has no credibility whatsoever. That reply personifies what the rest of the world and Canada confirm as the obvious about America. Ignorance and arrogance and little else pervades your society, much like that of your so called president.

    • Osama bin Amy Goodman!

      Watch your own "so called" ignorance and arrogance, friend.

  • John Perkins must have smoked too much dope in the 60’s and 70’s, because his book is mostly an hallucination. Spook behind every door, and an American too. If all the countries were cheated so badly the USA, why is it that the US has a national debt greater than most and and overwhelming trade imbalance today? Why are so many of the corporations he references bankrupt, extinct or consumed by other ones. Having been in many of the countries he references, seems they are all a lot better off than pre-american presence. Makes great reading, but a little too much balony.