Home > The Boston Bombings Swing in Israel’s and the NeoCon’s Favor
The Boston Bombings Swing in Israel’s and the NeoCon’s Favor
by Jonas E. Alexis - Open-Publishing - Wednesday 1 May 2013The Boston Bombings Swing in Israel’s and the NeoCon’s Favor
“The neo-con ideology promotes endless war, but neo-cons fight their battles with the blood of others. From the comfortable, subsidized offices of magazines like the Weekly Standard, the neo-conservatives urge the United States to engage in endless war – to be fought by the victims of the ‘poverty draft’ from states where there are few jobs.
Ironically, these young people cannot find more productive work because the Federal Reserve’s endless money printing to keep the war machine turning has destroyed our economy.”—U.S. Representative Ron Paul
…by Jonas E. Alexis
The Boston bombings have taught us many things, although we have yet to unravel all the details. My heart goes out to those who have been hurt and wounded from the incident.
If there is something that decent Americans have to reflect upon throughout this year would be this: America needs to seriously and collectively reconsider its unconditional allegiance to the Zionist regime in Israel. Decent Americans need to come to grip with what the neoconservative ideology is actually doing.
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev himself testified that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan “motivated him and his brother to carry out the attack…”[2] Elmirza Khozhugov, ex-brother-in-law of Boston bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev said the same thing, declaring, “He was looking for connections between the wars in the Middle East and oppression of Muslim population around the globe.”
Robert Spencer
Shortly after the attack, neoconservative Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch was quick to say that it was done in the name of Islam.[3]
What Spencer did not tell us was that one of the attackers made it clear that perpetual wars in the Middle East play a major role.
Spencer also could not tell us that the suspect’s uncle was married to C.I.A. officer’s daughter and shared a home with him.
Other neoconservatives such as Bruce Bawer of FrontPage magazine were quick to use this incident to popularize the neoconservative ideology through their powerful media outlets.
Neoconservative think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute were also on the move to use the incident as a conduit for their worldview.[4]
Bawer himself stated,
“All we need to know is that they [the attackers] were jihadists, and therefore our enemy. Period.”[5]
I full agree. All jihadists are by definition America’s enemies. But why are they our enemy? What prompted them to commit evil acts?