Le site Bellaciao: coloré, multiple, ou le meilleur cotoie fort heureusement le pire, mélangé, bizarre, picabien et dadaîste, explorant toutes sortes de registres et de régimes rhétoriques, drole et polémiqueur, surréaliste: rencontre d'un parapluie et d'une machine à coudre sur une table de dissection, têtes de Lénine sur le clavier d'un piano Steinway ou Bosendorfer...
FR
ES
Senal en Vivo
VIDEO
RADIO
FRIENDS SITES
with Bellaciao
Bellaciao hosted by
To rebel is right, to disobey is a duty, to act is necessary !
Bellaciao  mobile version   |   Home  |   About us   |   Donation  |   Links  |   Contact  |   Search
The University That We Want in France

by : Paris-VIII university faculty and staff
Tuesday December 4, 2007 - 19:16

An appeal by teachers at the University of Paris-VIII Vincennes - Saint-Denis - a petition to halt the "Law for the Reform of the University"

We, teachers, researchers and members of the personnel of the University, state our categorical opposition to the Law for the Reform of the University (LRU), our total support for the student protest movement and our participation in that movement.

Under the misnomer of “autonomy” (autonomy of management, but neither intellectual nor scientific autonomy) and in order to favor the creation of “poles of excellence” that will be aimed at improving the ranking of French universities in the derisory “Shanghai top university list” (or in the race to attract the best “brains”), the management-inspired LRU reform aims to increase competition between public institutions of education and research. In the long term, this competition is likely to transform most of them into "university colleges” limited to bachelor’s degree programs. The LRU reform also aims to delegate to these institutions the problem of managing the progressive reduction of government financing.

Thus, and to meet an already-existing financial crisis, these institutions are strongly incited to follow the example – which apparently is unsurpassed – of the prestigious university-level business and political science institutions (the "grandes écoles") - with competitive entrance examinations and join in the race for private funding, which, thanks to tax deductions, is becoming one of the gateways to public resources. Similarly, the recruiting of non-permanent staff is highly encouraged.

Indeed, the LRU reform anticipates the financial difficulties with which the universities will necessarily be faced, when they are unable to drain private and public resources, by allowing them to recruit non-permanent teaching, research and administrative staff.

There can be no doubt that, with this new possibility to recruit staff under private contract, the number of civil servants at the universities will continually shrink.

Finally, the LRU reform will inevitably lead to a progressive increase in student tuition. Like local authorities, which today are forced to increase local taxes in order to have the means to conduct an independent policy, institutions which do not directly interest the private employment market will in the long term necessarily be led to select their students and/or solicit them financially through a generalized increase in tuition fees (there is talk of fees of 3000 to 4000 euros). This increase that has been officially denied for essentially tactical reasons, is moreover being demanded by the National Assembly deputies belonging to the conservative UMP party and by the Conference of University Presidents (CPU).

Under the misnomer of “good government,” future university presidents will exercise a particularly tight control over the way their “dear colleagues” are recruited. Although they are presented as a remedy to the “parochialism” that influences much recruitment today, the selection committees provided for by the LRU law will only reinforce the system of feudal-style cronyism. To this must be added the other instruments for the “taming” of staff, as for example the administrative council’s power to decide on how teacher-researchers’ teaching, research and administration duties are to be shared out, the president’s power to grant bonuses, the creation of “profit-sharing” schemes, the recruiting of teaching and administrative personnel under either a temporary or an open-ended job contract, etc.

Thus the LRU reform constitutes a threat to the civil service status of all university personnel. As concerns teacher-researchers, it is manifestly a prelude to the reform of their job category recommended by Bernard Belloc, who moreover is a councilor on university affairs to President Nicolas Sarkozy. This dissociation of teaching and research, which notably will allow the ministry of education to “do more with less,” to use an expression that is dear to business consultants, fits in with the division and increased hierarchical ranking of institutions mentioned above, and also represents an unprecedented scientific regression, because the specificity of university teaching is that it is done by teachers who are also researchers.

Far from resolving the present problems of French universities, the LRU reform will notably contribute to increasing social inequality in the area of higher education in the name of a philosophy which declares competition to be the best guarantee that a service is adapted to public “needs.” Thus the democratization of the university (which is partial and limited, but which nevertheless if far greater than what is to be found in those already very “autonomous” institutions, the prestigious university-level "grandes écoles"), will not be strengthened in the direction of a democratization of “results” (access of all to all disciplines, all institutions, and with the same level of rigor), but in the direction of access to greater accompaniment towards the job market, notably through a generalization of precipitate “professionalisation” and a policy of (rarely-paid) student internships. Moreover this professionalisation is often presented as a universal panacea which will supposedly cure the ills of the university and satisfy social demands. And yet, there has been no true reflection on the acquisition of generic knowledge of the kind that permits later changes of career or the pursuit of studies “throughout life.”

In opposition to this head-on challenge to teaching and research as a public service – a challenge that is moreover cynical, as it is often disguised by favoring the supposed interests of students and more particularly the interests of underprivileged students (with some “fairness” economists trying to convince them that, in the final analysis, it is in their interest that tuition fees should be much higher) – it is necessary to unceasingly repeat that the missions of the university are necessarily plural, notably as concerns the expansion and transmission of knowledge, the development of research and of a critical attitude, and the general raising of the educational level of the population. The missions of the university cannot be reduced – as the prevailing econmics-is-everything viewpoint would have one believe – to the production of a ready-to-use work force, under the pretext and taking advantage of the fact that this workforce of course needs to work. It is the vocation of each university to be a living cultural and scientific center, open to all and notably to the children coming from a democratizated schopol system, who are particularly numerous at our university, and who must continue to find here a place of intellectual emancipation and of upward social mobility.

As a consequence, we call on our colleagues to mobilize, not to penalize students at exam-time for having participated in the protest movement, and above all to participate actively themselves, notably by inviting students to reflect with them on the university’s mission, such as in the development of the upcoming curriculums as called for by the so-called "LMD2" program of ministry-vetting of universities. The university that we want is first and foremost a university for students, teacher-researchers, researchers and all the people who work at the university, and not the university dreamed up by private business.

First signers of the appeal:

Avril Christelle, sociology, Paris-VIII, Beaud Stéphane, sociology, ENS, Béliard Aude, sociology, Paris-VIII, Ben Hounet Yazid, anthropology, Paris-VIII, Coulmont Baptiste, sociology, Paris-VIII, Cusso Roser, sociology, Paris-VIII, Davault Corinne, sociology, Paris-VIII, Diener Ingolf, anthropology, Paris-VIII, Gaertner Laure, sociology, Paris VIII Jounin Nicolas, sociology, Paris-VIII, Laé Jean-François, sociology, Paris-VIII, Lafaye Claudette, sociology, Paris-VIII, Ménoret Marie, sociology, Paris-VIII, Molinéro Stéphanie, sociology, Paris-VIII, Riot-Sarcey Michèle, history, Paris-VIII, Soulié Charles, sociology, Paris-VIII, Terrolle Daniel, anthropology, Paris-VIII, Trat Josette, sociology, Paris-VIII.

This appeal can be viewed in whole at the following Internet sites :

http://www.universite-democratique....
http://solidarite-greves.over-blog....

To sign the appeal write to:
p8_contre_la_lru@yahoo.fr

ORIGINAL FRENCH ARTICLE : L’université que nous voulons…

Translated Sunday 2 December 2007, by Gene Zbikowski

http://www.humaniteinenglish.com/ar...



Leave a comment
Print this article





Public Apology to Women of the World from The American Republic (Hypatia of Alex
Monday 31 - 15:21
by Willam Morgan
YES, THERE WILL BE ELECTION FRAUD, AND ON A GRAND SCALE
Sunday 23 - 18:32
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Hillary Clinton will be first female President 2017
Monday 10 - 17:21
by Willam Morgan
Police Shootings: Law, Policy, and Accountability
Thursday 6 - 14:22
by William John Cox
AMERICA DESERVES BETTER, BUT EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE WORLD DESERVES BETTER
Thursday 29 - 18:02
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Back to School for Fascist Dupont-Aignan
Thursday 15 - 11:32
by Nouveau Comité de Vigilance des Intellectuels Antifascistes
The Presidency: Character Matters
Friday 9 - 15:06
by William John Cox
WHY HILLARY IS THE PERFECT PERSON TO SECURE OBAMA’S LEGACY
Tuesday 30 - 18:08
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Remake of Ben Hur in 2020 planned by new motion picture studio
Friday 26 - 15:50
by Wallace
THE CASE FOR DONALD TRUMP
Monday 22 - 19:32
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES IS DEAD
Thursday 11 - 06:42
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
DONALD TRUMP AND THE GENIUS OF IDIOCY
Friday 5 - 00:47
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
FOOLING MOST OF THE PEOPLE MOST OF THE TIME IS WHAT AMERICAN POLITICS ARE ABOUT,
Friday 29 - 18:13
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
A message of your fellow striking workers from France
Tuesday 12 - 20:49
by Info’Com-CGT
The Right to Vote, Effectively
Friday 8 - 22:20
by William John Cox
Fourth of July Lies
Sunday 3 - 19:41
by June C. Terpstra
Who Should Make Political Policy, the People or the Politicians?
Friday 24 - 15:14
by William John Cox
Hollow Women of the Hegemon Part II: Atrocity Enabling Harpies
Tuesday 21 - 18:49
by Dr. June Terpstra
The American Republic Manifestum book is being made into a Movie
Saturday 11 - 15:54
by William Morgan
Write-in Voting and Political Protest
Wednesday 1 - 15:05
by William John Cox
Yves Bouvier art battle plays out in online and social media arena
Tuesday 31 - 21:12
by Dean Bagley
Damaged Candidate Clinton Can’t Call Out Trump
Friday 27 - 13:53
by Daniel Patrick Welch
PLEDGE OF THE NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY
Tuesday 24 - 21:53
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
LET TEXAS SECEDE
Thursday 19 - 00:53
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
LAS TRES ERRES A LA ENÉSIMA POTENCIA.-
Monday 16 - 15:35
by FREDDY SUBDIAGA
DEMAGOGIA POPULISTA...
Monday 16 - 15:26
by FREDDY SUBDIAGA
Oligarchs Won’t Let You Vote Their Wars Away
Wednesday 11 - 20:24
by Daniel Patrick Welch
AN AMERICAN ORIGINAL: JOHN KERRY - FROM HIS REMARKABLE RECENT COMMENCEMENT ADDR
Monday 9 - 20:40
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton support the American Republic Manifestum
Monday 9 - 16:37
by William Morgan
Transformation: A Student-Led Mass Political Movement
Monday 25 - 19:28
by William John Cox
Algerian Feminists react to ’Hijab Day’ in Paris 2016
Monday 25 - 01:13
THE ILLUSION OF RIGHTS
Friday 22 - 18:45
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
US is real superpredator pretending to be victim
Monday 18 - 22:23
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Gaiacomm International has accidently created a fusion reaction/ignition.
Sunday 17 - 17:01
by William Morgan
Clinton’s Campaign Continues to Highlight Horrible Hillary
Saturday 9 - 00:57
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Armoiries racistes à Harvard : Plaidoyer pour la réflexion socio-historique
Thursday 7 - 18:56
by Samuel Beaudoin Guzzo
THANK YOU MISSISSIPPI FOR YOUR HATE
Wednesday 6 - 02:02
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
The PKK in Iraq: “We are ready to fight ISIS everywhere in the world”
Monday 4 - 14:33
by InfoAut
Clinton Crashes and Burns, Sanders Will Win (But hold off on the applause)
Friday 1 - 22:33
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Confirming Supreme Court Justices and Electing Presidents
Friday 1 - 20:59
by William John Cox

home | webmaster



Follow-up of the site's activity
RSS Bellaciao En


rss FR / rss IT / rss ES



Bellaciao hosted by DRI

Organize, agitate, educate, must be our war cry. Susan B. Anthony
Facebook Twitter Google+
DAZIBAO
I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name
Thursday 10 March
©Olivier Jobard/Myop I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM IS A RIGHT In the phrase « right to asylum », every word matters. Under the law, every person who is persecuted because of his or her political opinions or because of his or her identity, every person that is endangered by violence, war or misery has a RIGHT to seek asylum in another country The aim of this petition is to collect (...)
read more...
Neo-Nazis and far-right protesters in Ukraine 3 live-stream
Friday 24 January
2 comments
The far-right in Ukraine are acting as the vanguard of a protest movement that is being reported as pro-democracy. The situation on the ground is not as simple as pro-EU and trade versus pro-Putin and Russian hegemony in the region. When US Senator John McCain dined with Ukraine’s opposition leaders in December, he shared a table and later a stage with the leader of the extreme far-right Svoboda party Oleh Tyahnybok. This is Oleh Tyahnybok, he has claimed a "Moscow-Jewish mafia" (...)
read more...
Hugo Chavez is dead (video live)
Wednesday 6 March
by : Collective BELLACIAO
1 comment
President Hugo Chavez companeros venezueliano died after a long battle with cancer.
read more...
International initiative to stop the war in Syria Yes to democracy, no to foreign intervention!
Thursday 13 December
Your support here: http://www.peaceinsyria.org/support.php We, the undersigned, who are part of an international civil society increasingly worried about the awful bloodshed of the Syrian people, are supporting a political initiative based on the results of a fact-finding mission which some of our colleagues undertook to Beirut and Damascus in September 2012. This initiative consists in calling for a delegation of highranking personalities and public figures to go to Syria in order to (...)
read more...
THE KU KLUX KLAN ONCE AGAIN CONTROLS INDIANA
Monday 12 November
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
7 comments
At first glance, the results of America’s 2012 election appear to be a triumph for social, racial, and economic justice and progress in the United States: California voters passed a proposition requiring the rich to shoulder their fair share of the tax burden; Two states, Colorado and Washington, legalized the recreational use of marijuana, while Massachusetts approved the use of marijuana for medical purposes; Washington and two other states, Maine and Maryland, legalized same-sex (...)
read more...
I’VE DECIDED TO "WASTE" MY VOTE
Sunday 28 October
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
In a 2004 episode of Comedy Central’s animated series South Park, an election was held to determine whether the new mascot for the town’s elementary school would be a “giant douche” or a “turd sandwich.” Confronted with these two equally unpalatable choices, one child, Stan Marsh, refused to vote at all, which resulted in his ostracization and subsequent banishment from the town. Although this satirical vulgarity was intended as a commentary on the two (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART IV
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART III If there is one major inconsistency in life, it is that young people who know little more than family, friends and school are suddenly, at the age of eighteen, supposed to decide what they want to do for the rest of their lives. Unfortunately, because of their limited life experiences, the illusions they have about certain occupations do not always comport to the realities. I discovered this the first time I went to college. About a year into my studies, I (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART III
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART IV Disillusioned with the machinations of so-called “traditional” colleges, I became an adjunct instructor at several “for-profit” colleges. Thanks largely to the power and pervasiveness of the Internet, “for-profit” colleges (hereinafter for-profits) have become a growing phenomenon in America. They have also been the subject of much political debate and the focus of a Frontline special entitled College Inc. Unlike traditional (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART II
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART III PART IV Several years ago, a young lady came into the college where I was teaching to inquire about a full-time instructor’s position in the sociology department. She was advised that only adjunct positions were available. Her response was, “No thanks. Once an adjunct, always an adjunct.” Her words still echo in my mind. Even as colleges and universities raise their tuition costs, they are relying more and more on adjunct instructors. Adjuncts are (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART I
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART II PART III PART IV When The Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution over two hundred years ago, Americans were blessed with many rights considered to be “fundamental.” One conspicuously missing, however, was the right to an education. This was not surprising given the tenor of the times. America was primarily an agrarian culture, and education, especially higher education, was viewed as a privilege reserved for the children of the rich and (...)
read more...
ONE SOLITARY LIFE, PART TWO
Monday 30 July
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
3 comments
If there is one universal question that haunts all human beings at some point in their lives, it is, “Why do we die?” Death, after all, is the great illogic. It ultimately claims all, the rich and the poor, the mighty and the small, the good and the evil. Death also has the capability to make most human pursuits—such as the quest for wealth, fame and power—vacuous and fleeting. Given this reality, I have often wondered why so many people are still willing to (...)
read more...
HOW MUCH CORRUPTION CAN DEMOCRACY ENDURE?
Thursday 28 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
6 comments
How much corruption can a “democracy” endure before it ceases to be a democracy? If five venal, mendacious, duplicitous, amoral, biased and (dare I say it) satanic Supreme Court “justices”—John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy—have their way, America will soon find out. In several previous articles for Pravda.Ru, I have consistently warned how the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision is one of the (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS, PART TWO
Tuesday 12 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
1 comment
Imagine, if you will, that the United States government passes a law banning advertisers from sponsoring commercials on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show or Rupert Murdoch’s Fox (Faux) “News” Network. On one hand, there would be two decided advantages to this ban: The National IQ would undoubtedly increase several percentage points, and manipulative pseudo-journalists would no longer be able to appeal to the basest instincts in human nature for ratings and profit while (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS
Thursday 7 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Pravda.Ru Legal Editor
4 comments
LIVE, from the State that brought you Senator Joseph McCarthy, Wisconsin voters now proudly present, fresh from his recall election victory, Governor Scott Walker! At first glance, it is almost unfathomable that anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have voted to retain Scott Walker as Wisconsin’s governor. This, after all, is a man who openly declared he is trying to destroy the rights of workers through a “divide and conquer” strategy; who received 61% of the (...)
read more...
PEOPLE WITHOUT SOULS
Tuesday 13 March
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
2 comments
A question I’ve frequently been asked since I began writing for Pravda.Ru in 2003 is, “Why did you become disillusioned with the practice of law?” This question is understandable, particularly since, in most people’s minds, being an attorney is synonymous with wealth and political power. I’ve always been reluctant to answer this question for fear it will discourage conscientious and ethical people from pursuing careers in the legal profession—a (...)
read more...