Home > Vote Fraud likely in both President and Senate Races

Vote Fraud likely in both President and Senate Races

by Open-Publishing - Thursday 11 November 2004
4 comments

Elections-Elected USA

Analysis of the Nation’s Senate races yield mores anomalies in favor of
the Republicans. Looking at Florida’s election results, I noticed the
Senate race was very close, with the Democrat Betty Castor losing in a
nail-biter 49-48%, only 78,221 votes short.

Then I noticed that the total number of votes for Senate was quite a
bit less than in the presidential race. 253,105 people voted for
president but failed to cast a ballot for senator. 
Interesting.... so I analyzed all of the Senate races and compared them
to each state’s Presidential totals- are there more states with a
significant number of voters skipping out on the Senate Race?
(hereafter referred to as ’missing votes’)

The results:

There were two races in the nation, Florida and Kentucky, where the
Republican Senator won by a hair, with more than enough missing votes
to change the result.

In South Dakota the numbers were different, but the republican still
won. The SD senatorial race was the closest in the nation with the
Republican winning by only 4,535 votes. Oddly enough, there were
no missing votes, in fact 9,323 more votes were cast for Senator than
for President.

In Alaska there were also more votes for Senator than president, not
enough to change the result, but perhaps close enough to warrant a
recount. Alaska uses Diebold central tabulators to count the
optical scan machine results, and if you’ve been following the election
fraud stories, you know how unreliable the optical scan counties were
in Florida.

http://www.rubberbug.com/temp/Florida2004chart.htm

Of course the Republicans are going to argue that ’missing votes’ are
typical. Of course a certain percentage of people are going to
vote for President and skip voting for Senator. Why? I’m not
sure, but ok- let’s look at the numbers.

There were 34 senate races, 29 of which had less votes for Senator than
President, 5 had More votes for Senator. This graph represents
percent of voters that didn’t vote for Senator, negative numbers
indicate the 5 oddball states with more votes for Senator than
President.

Idaho was an anomaly with the Dem Senator receiving only 1% of the
vote- he must have had a huge scandal or something- so 15% of the
people did not even bother to vote for Senator. NY and CT were
Democratic Senator blowouts represented by the top to blips on the
graph, clearly outside the standard deviation.

Looking at the other 31 races within the range the percentage of missing votes:
Average: 1.24%
Std. Dev: 1.40%

So the standard deviation, represented by the blue lines ranges from
 0.16% —> 2.64% and all 4 of these races, narrowly won by a
Republican, fall outside the standard deviation. Actually they
are 2 out of the most extreme three at each end of the spectrum.

To summarize: In election 2004, every time there was a tight race for a
Senate seat, the Republican won. And in each of those races there is a
significant difference in the number of votes cast for Senator and for
President.

Just another coincidence? Let’s list all of the coincidences, just for fun:


Florida optical scan counties show 2/3 of the county registered as
democrats, but the vote was reversed with Bush getting 2/3 of the vote-
ONLY in Florida op-scan counties. Other counties voted pretty much as
they were registered. See the chart (linked above) first.

http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm


Exit Polls correct in non-swing states, but way off in swing states.

http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=4175


Dozens of reported voting irregularities like:


 Machines counting backwards in Florida

 4000 votes for 600 voters in one Ohio County- both stories here- see pic at bottom

 New computer voting machines losing votes because they ’can only handle’ 3000 votes

 Of course the ubiquitous ’touch kerry but the machine chooses bush’ error
http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=4194

Of course, all of the computer glitches and malfunctions and lost votes
_always_ favor the ruling party. Colorado’s numbers sure look fishy

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/11/302852.shtml


We can’t exclude the voter suppression stories. Republicans proudly
acknowledge they were manning polling booths across the country to
intimidate voters, create long lines and encourage people to turn give
up and leave. 

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Nov2004/Fitrakis1108.htm


And now we can add to the list- all close senate races were won by republicans with very questionable results.

Toss in the incredible coincidence of 2 consecutive elections where a Democratic senator (Carnahan and Wellstone) dies in
a plane crash one month before the election... and one has to wonder, is
it really possible that these are all coincidences?

And for the cherry on top we can all remember Bush ’won’ Florida in
2000 by 536 votes...

yet there was the infamous Palm Beach County
Butterfly ballot that gave Pat Buchanan 3000 votes that clearly were
meant for Gore, and I suggest you’d have to be willfully ignorant and
blind if you can’t see that we now have exactly what our Forefathers
freed us
from, a King named George.

Fool me once shame on you, Fool me twice, shame on me

Data Source:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/senate/full.list/

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/FL/P/00/

Here is the data in excel format if you’d like to analyze it yourself.

http://www.indybay.org/uploads/senate_races.rm

Note: This is not a realmedia file. Indybay wouldn’t let me upload it as xls- so i changed the extension to .rm - just change it back to .xls and it will open in your spreadsheet.

Forum posts

  • Great analysis! Thanks for perpetuating the truth!
    marsha in staten island

  • http://lnvb.westside.com/NewMexico/NewMexicoByCounty.html

    Just sent out by Black Box Voting. New voter results from NM. Check it out. Pass it on.
    Emit

  • You Democrats NEVER give up...KEEP DREAMING!

    Here’s some highlights of Troxler’s comprehensive analysis in today’s Times:
    CLAIM: Kerry really won Ohio.

    There are still 155,000 or so uncounted provisional and absentee ballots. If by some miracle Kerry got almost all of them, he would win. A miracle. [Bush’s Ohio margin of victory was 136,000 votes.]

    Furthermore, there also were 93,000 "spoiled" ballots in Ohio that, had they gone to Kerry by a miraculously large margin . . . uh, well, still wouldn’t have been enough. . . . .

    CLAIM: A machine in Franklin County, Ohio, recorded an extra 3,893 votes for Bush.

    This is perfectly true, and one of at least two serious machine mistakes around the country. When the results cartridge of an older-generation machine was plugged in to the counter, it reported almost 4,000 extra votes for Bush, when only 638 people had voted in the precinct.

    At the risk of being labeled part of the plot, I want to point out that they caught this obvious mistake. You can’t "stuff’ the ballot box. There is a signed, independent record of how many people voted. . . .

    CLAIM: Electronic voting machines in Carteret County, N.C., mysteriously "lost" more than 4,500 votes - most of the votes cast in the county election!

    This one is true, too, and disturbing. According to the Carteret County News-Times, the county’s machines counted only the first 3,005 votes and didn’t count the rest.

    The Carteret screwup didn’t change the presidential outcome, but a couple of state races were close enough to be affected. Besides, the standard of "no harm, no foul" is not good enough. But I would point out that even this mistake was obvious and immediately detected. . . .

    CLAIM: Voting patterns in some Florida counties were suspicious because Bush got many more votes than the number of registered Republicans.

    Several impressive-looking charts and graphs are flying around. MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann singled out five Florida counties for what he called a "sudden" outbreak of "irregularities:" Baker, Dixie, Holmes, Lafayette and Liberty.

    In those counties, Republicans make up only 7 to 24 percent of registered voters. But Bush won there with between 64 and 78 percent of the vote.

    How can this be? Easy. They are northern "Dixiecrat" counties where being a registered Democrat but voting Republican is an old habit. The same counties voted overwhelmingly for Bush in 2000, and his father in 1988 - when registered Republicans made up as little as 2 percent of the electorate!

    That’s just the tip of the iceberg of Troxler’s analysis. We trust that the folks in elite media will take some time chewing over his full report before they lend any more credence to the kookball complainers who want Kerry to "unconcede" the election.

    • Simple addition: "155,000 or so uncounted provisional and absentee ballots" + "there also were 93,000 "spoiled" ballots in Ohio"

      Gee, that makes 248,000 which could have easily gone to kerry 80-20% seeing that the provisional and spoiled ballots were all in democratic counties. Many precincts in cleveland voted 80 kerry anyway, so in all likelihood kerry got 200,000+ and wins the state- too bad he doesn’t want it.

      I am SO glad that kerry and edwards have exposed themselves and mere cogs in the machine- not really interested in turning the country around like they claimed. Whatever happened to "Wrong direction, wrong priorites for America" - now he’s all to ready to get in line and follow Bush.