Home > No Evidence WMDs Were Moved From Iraq: Officials

No Evidence WMDs Were Moved From Iraq: Officials

by Open-Publishing - Tuesday 18 January 2005
4 comments

Wars and conflicts International

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2...

No Evidence WMDs Were Moved From Iraq: Officials
January 17, 2005

WASHINGTON (AP) - As the hunt for weapons of mass destruction dragged on unsuccessfully in Iraq, top U.S. administration officials speculated publicly that the banned armaments may have been smuggled out of the country before the war started.

Whether Saddam Hussein moved deadly chemical, biological or radiological arms is one of the unresolved issues that the final U.S. intelligence report on Iraq’s programs is expected to address next month.

But intelligence and congressional officials say they have not seen any information indicating that banned weapons or significant amounts of components and equipment were transferred from Iraq to neighbouring Syria, Jordan or elsewhere.

The U.S. administration acknowledged last week that the search for banned weapons is largely over. The Iraq Survey Group’s chief, Charles Duelfer, is expected to submit the final instalments of his report in February. A small number of the organization’s experts will remain on the job in case new intelligence on such Iraqi weapons is unearthed.

But the officials familiar with the search say U.S. authorities have found no evidence that former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein transferred banned weapons or related equipment out of Iraq.

A special adviser to the CIA director, Duelfer declined an interview request through an agency spokesman. In his last public statements, he told a Senate panel last October that it remained unclear whether weapons of mass destruction, or WMD, could have been moved from Iraq.

"What I can tell you is that I believe we know a lot of materials left Iraq and went to Syria. There was certainly a lot of traffic across the border points," he said. "But whether in fact in any of these trucks there was WMD-related materials, I cannot say."

Last week, a congressional official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said suggestions that weapons or components were sent from Iraq were based on speculation stemming from uncorroborated information.

President George W. Bush and top-ranking officials in his administration used the existence of WMD in Iraq as the main justification for the March 2003 invasion, and throughout much of last year the White House continued to raise the possibility the weapons were transferred to another country.

For instance:

 Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said in early October he believed Saddam had WMD before the war. "He has either hidden them so well or moved them somewhere else, or decided to destroy them ... in event of a conflict but kept the capability of developing them rapidly," Rumsfeld said in a Fox News Channel interview.

Eight months earlier, he told senators "it’s possible that WMD did exist, but was transferred, in whole or in part, to one or more other countries. We see that theory put forward."

 Secretary of State Colin Powell expressed concern the WMD would be found. However, when asked in September if the WMD could have been hidden or moved to a country like Syria, he said, "I can’t exclude any of those possibilities."

 And, on MSNBC’s Hardball in June, Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said: "Everyone believed that his programs were more active than they appeared to be, but recognize, he had a lot of time to move stuff, a lot of time to hide stuff."

Since the October report from Duelfer, which said Saddam intended to obtain WMD but had no banned weapons, senior administration leaders have largely stopped discussing whether the weapons were moved.

Last week, the intelligence and congressional officials said evidence indicating somewhat common equipment with dual military and civilian uses, such as fermenters, was salvaged during post-invasion looting and sold for scrap in other countries. Syria was mentioned as one location.

However, the U.S. intelligence community’s 2002 estimate on Iraq indicated there were sizable weapons programs and stockpiles. The officials said weapons experts have not found a production capability in Iraq that would back up the size of the prewar estimates.

Among a series of key findings, that estimate said Iraq "has largely rebuilt missile and biological weapons facilities damaged" during a 1998 U.S.-British bombing campaign and "has expanded its chemical and biological infrastructure under the cover of civilian production."

Although the U.S. had little specific information, the estimate also said Saddam probably stockpiled at least 100 tonnes, possibly 500 tonnes, of chemical weapons agents, "much of it added in the last year."

Portfolio

Forum posts

  • Any arms, chemical weapons that they possessed could be audited from US or British accounts and receipts.
    Its fairly irrellevent whether the spurious accusations and affirmations that Iraq possessed or had intentions of possessing ’weapons of mass destruction’. The intention of the Washington regime was clear from the outset, and they were looking for reasons to spin to the public to justify the stealing of a sovereign nations resources along with the mass killing of men, women, children and babies -but then again this isn’t important as they ’don’t do body counts’.

  • This is hardly news. If Saddam Hussein had WMDs, wouldn’t he have used them against us when we invaded? What was he doing, saving them for a special occasion?

  • Number One: Think about what a Nuclear Deterrent is? If Sadam Hussein had had Nuclear weapons we would never have went to war with him. Public opinion around the world is so strongly set against Nukes and their possible use that the only thing Nukes effectively do is stabilize the borders against outside influence. Whenever there is a problem with another nation invading, all one need to do is rattle the nuclear saber and the influences silence. Look at the way Israel uses their Nukes, which we gave them: no one can attact them because they have them. Meanwhile they can attack anyone else in the Middleast they want because no one in the Middleast proper has them, and because we are backing them up 100%. If Sadam had actually had WMD’s, it would have changed this whole dynamic.

    Thus, our interests in Sadam were purely mercantile. We just wanted to carve up the oil fields for the betterment of the oil magnates, which Bush himself is part of. And we created—with the help of the Media as a loud fourth partner—a demon in order to go to War.