Home > UN demands Israel scrap barrier
The UN General Assembly has adopted a resolution demanding that Israel comply with a world court ruling to dismantle its West Bank barrier.
The vote was passed with 150 in favour, 6 opposed and 10 abstentions.
All EU countries voted in support after agreeing changes to the text with Arab states, but the US opposed it.
The resolution, which is non-binding, was drafted after the International Court of Justice ruled the barrier illegally cut into Palestinian land.
’Perversion of justice’
The 191-nation General Assembly has no power to force countries to act on its recommendations, but the issue could then go to the Security Council which theoretically has the power to impose economic sanctions.
However, the US has spoken out against the ICJ’s advisory ruling and the new resolution, and wields a veto in the Security Council.
BBC UN correspondent Susannah Price says the resolution is an attempt to put moral pressure on Israel.
Israeli Ambassador Dan Gillerman described it as a "perversion of justice".
"It is simply outrageous to respond with such vigour to a measure that saves lives and responds with such casual indifference and apathy to the ongoing campaign of Palestinian terrorism that takes lives," he said.
But Palestinian representative Nasser al-Kidwa said it was time for Israel to comply - and for "additional measures" at a later stage, if it does not.
The Palestinian Authority has said it will delay pushing for a Security Council resolution until after the US presidential elections in November.
Barrier
Israel has insisted it needs the barrier to stop Palestinian suicide bombers.
Opponents say the barrier, which juts into the West Bank, is a ploy to seize land and complicates moves to create a Palestinian state.
Israel says it will comply with an Israeli Supreme Court ruling ordering the 640 km (400 mile) barrier to be re-routed around Jerusalem, but has vowed to continue to press on with construction.
US Deputy Ambassador James Cunningham said that the resolution was unbalanced.
"The United States remains convinced that the focus must remain on President Bush’s vision of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side," he said.
Israel, Australia, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau also opposed the resolution.
In a statement, the European Union underlined that Israel had the right to self-defence and that it was troubled by some sections of the world court ruling, which is also non-binding.
Forum posts
21 July 2004, 22:59
Doesn’t it seem strange to anyone that the PLO, an organization, not a state, acts within the UN as if it were atleast a super power? This tiny organization, representing 3 million people takes up an incredible percent of the resources, time, and energy of the UN. The result is that those who really need the UN’s help don’t get heard over there because of the palestinian shouts. When was the last time the UN did something for millions slaughtered in civil wars and racial massacres in Sudan, Rwanda, and so on? What did the UN do for the tenths of thousands killed in the Chechnian war? What does the UN do for millions dying in North Korea through torture and hunger? What does the UN do to help millions of children being reduced to prostitution and slavery in Asia and Africa?
There are so many millions of people in the world that need international help, but the truth is that they’re not backed by those with the money, power or oil, and that’s why nobody gives a shit about them. Stop giving so much attention to the palestinians, and start helping those who really need your help!!!
21 July 2004, 23:37
The UN is a joke. They never have had or will have the any clout with world affairs. Its window dressing! A room full of Ambassadors (which means they were not wanted in their own country) nodding for and against the problems of the world instead of fixing them.