contributions

As we label food to make informed choices we should also analyze and label programming so we can make informed choices. All programming that is aired should be verified for content, scope, and type, and verified factually and if it meets these criteria then it can be labeled and presented as "NEWS" or "INFORMATION" thus as fact. Today we have no labeling standards only for voilence or such things which is not a verification by an independent people controlled body to insure we as democractic (…)

It has happed before and it happened in the time of the founding of this country with the King of England who had become a tyrant unto his own people, and thus we as a group of individuals pressed forward and commited treason against such a force and penned the Declaration of Independence, and with in it are these sacred lines upon which we must act today, if we wish to preserve ours rights as men and women of honor, men and women of self respect, and men and women who love more than money (…)

And if I could then ask both of you to comment on the very well-publicized British memo that was leaked to the Times of London, or to the London Times. Madame Secretary —
SECRETARY RICE: Which one is that? Andrea, which one is that?
FOREIGN SECRETARY STRAW: Which one is that?
QUESTION: On Iraq. That came out about 10 days ago, 12 days ago. Are you not aware of this memo?
SECRETARY RICE: Well, a lot of them are, unfortunately, out. (Laughter.)
QUESTION: In particular, this memo — (…)

George Lakoff, guru of "reframing." Lakoff suggested relabeling the issue: "radioactive weaponry". The name "depleted uranium" was carefully selected to imply harmlessness. "Radioactive weaponry" raises a red flag.
(Oklahoma City, Red State of Delusion) The term "Depleted Uranium" is misleading, on purpose. So-called "Depleted uranium" results from making hydrogen bombs. The CIA tries to deceive us all, all the time. They have succeeded for 55 years. George Lakoff blows the lid off (…)

"Under international law, it is illegal, as Lord Goldsmith said, to attack a sovereign country for the purpose of toppling the government. It is illegal to even plan to do so. These crimes are known as conspiring to wage aggressive war and waging aggressive war. They were the two main offences for which Nazi leaders were tried at Nuremberg." Dan Gardner CanWest ’British Memo a Smoking Gun’
What will it take to finally awaken Americans to the illegal, cynically pre-mediated war?
American (…)

THE RAF and US aircraft doubled the rate at which they were dropping bombs on Iraq in 2002 in an attempt to provoke Saddam Hussein into giving the allies an excuse for war, new evidence has shown.
The attacks were intensified from May, six months before the United Nations resolution that Tony Blair and Lord Goldsmith, the attorney-general, argued gave the coalition the legal basis for war. By the end of August the raids had become a full air offensive.
The details follow the leak to The (…)

HOW DID BUSH GET US INTO THIS MESS?
By Peter Fredson
Several friends asked me this week about the divided nation, the War in Iraq, and how this recent mess evolved.
Before George W. Bush took office in January of 2001, he and a few neoconservatives had planned a preemptive attack on Iraq, supposedly to effect “regime change”
Plans to create a “global Pax Americana” were made by people like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, Lewis Libby (Chief of Staff for Cheney) (…)

I apologize, as George W. Bush would say, "I misspoke". What I meant to say was, "on vietnam". Does this sound familiar?
ECT "And as I ponder the madness of Vietnam and search within myself for ways to understand and respond in compassion, my mind goes constantly to the people of that peninsula. I speak not now of the soldiers of each side, not of military government in Saigon, but simply of the people who have been under the curse of war for almost three continuous decades now.
I think (…)

Does our President lie to the American public and allow other politicians to commonly exercise that option? Is our President a War monger that has allowed the use of banned chemical weapons, that even now are causing serious side effects and health related problems of our own military heros? Has he left America, its citizens and its borders unprotected?
Does he put his secret society’s causes before American causes (Skull & Bones)? Has he allowed pedophilia in Government to run (…)

On saturday 28th (sorry of my bad English-just at the top)
Here below is the article of Baudrillard published two weeks ago in "Liberation". This Saturday in Le monde 2-the weekly magazine of the daily Le monde-, photographic autoportrait of Baudrillard cover and long interview more explicative and more radicalized about the vote "No", on European referendum and on the question of Europe. He says that No it was as a silent local dissent at first BUT then it was a reflected dissent based on (…)