Difficulty of our democracies vis-a-vis to terrorism.

It will certainly not be a question of legitimating terrorist acts but of locating this phenomenon which is not new since there exists in the various chapters of the history everywhere, especially and primarily where the force of the dominant political States, managers of the world to the considerable cultural powers sought and still seek to impose certain disciplines of expansionism limited by the slopes of missiles only ramparts on the economic invasion.

Where processes which uses the force for the opening of new markets - conscience made that a military power is always exposed to returns when its attitude exceeds the simple defensive to pass to offensives under pretext of ensure the economic advancement -, that cultural barriers are destroyed, of the weakened individuals, the burned books, pacifist exterminated, the moderate ones judged for lack of effectiveness; never, ô large never the great fatherlands of official nations will not have managed to maintain a peace total.

The economy, yes, they arrived at the globaliser but peace is in sacrifice of the multiplication of the hearths of conflicts Westerners-islamist or européano-américano-African "Poles" geared down with the four corners of the financial Empires in full evolution guarantors of our richnesses, it would seem that this dreaded phenomenon with the unhoped-for effectiveness that became terrorism since about thirty years that he threatens met to us the soldier on the public voice and the lack of receptiveness of mind the tops lieus in an economic simplification of more afflicting, of-it it to pass in addition to certain reserves vis-a-vis to the authorized horrors and a pronounced dislike, officially but not rationally, towards this manner of making go it how to make smart! Never as many civilizations were threatened and for its construction, Europe was not in remainder to sacrifice the VIII centuries of history which bound it to Islam. The keen combat that with obstinacy the intellectuals carried out could not alas maintain the machinery economic within limits bearable and acceptable for the unit; / Western, North-South, rich/poor, dominant/is dominated...

Those which Jean-Claude Charitat (low on the French site concerning terrorism) names the "starvers in power" should not be only put at the dock, nor only the capitalist system, but to begin again with zero certain concepts of education who lead gradually, at each age of the life, towards the conduits of any power or of the definable behaviors by terrorism then prone to all the possible and conceivable forms of authority. Wouldn’t the evolution of the secular political parties also going in forced uses to use all the forces available, particularly military, rather act to wonder which were the first terrorists? Colonizers or colonized?

In addition to the fact that De Gaulle was an excellent soldier but an inefficient policy repurchased by let us bar collaborationnists and with the fact of all the efforts made by the exactions of the OAS and resurgences of the extreme right-hand sides, we well how see certain policies close to the terrorism of State are played of the democracies in the name of the alleged interest of all. With us thus to perceive and to be vigilant vis-a-vis with the governments which interior already put the democracy at evil; by practice to have sown political terror they become kings and the deeply contemporary subject will not prevent the social claims and political engagement to yield with the secrecy of State! The democracy being well the attitude to make speak what is keep silent, to reveal hidden. The good conduits being the pivot of these silences it is not excluded that indiscipline and civic disobedience cause "released spoken" and want to come to end from the democracies from carnival...