Home > US asks court to drop ex-detainees’ torture suit
US asks court to drop ex-detainees’ torture suit
by Open-Publishing - Tuesday 7 March 20062 comments
Justice International Prison USA
33 minutes ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department asked a federal court on Monday to dismiss a lawsuit charging that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld bears responsibility for the torture of detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In its first substantive response to the lawsuit filed by two rights groups, the Justice Department said the suit against Rumsfeld should be dismissed based on the "absolute immunity" granted federal officials under 1988 legislation on civil lawsuits.
"That act bars suits against federal officials for conduct performed with the scope of their employment except for claims for violations of the Constitution or of federal statutes," the filing said.
The government also said that the court had no jurisdiction over cases seeking damages for alleged violations of international law.
The American Civil Liberties Union and Human Rights First filed suit on March 1, 2005 on behalf of nine men — five Iraqis and four Afghans — who said they were tortured by U.S. forces while in custody. None of the men were ever prosecuted. All were released.
The suit focuses on an order Rumsfeld signed in December 2002, that authorized new interrogation techniques for detainees in the "war on terror," including "stress positions," 20-hour interrogations, removal of clothing, the use of dogs and prolonged isolation and sensory deprivation.
The suit alleges that when evidence became overwhelming that prisoners were being tortured, Rumsfeld turned a blind eye.
"Secretary Rumsfeld takes the extraordinary position in his brief that ordering torture was ’within the scope of his employment’ as Secretary of Defense. Especially in light of recent finds that no one at senior levels has been held to account for gross acts of torture and abuse of detainees, this is a remarkable abdication of the responsibility of command," said Deborah Pearlstein, a representative of Human Rights First.
The plaintiffs want the court to declare Rumsfeld’s actions unconstitutional and a violation of U.S. and international law. They are also seeking monetary damages for their injuries.
The rights groups amended the original complaint in January to include similar suits against three other senior officers: Col. Thomas Pappas, Gen. Janis Karpinski and Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez.
original link http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060307... related links http://search.news.yahoo.com/search... http://search.news.yahoo.com/search... http://search.news.yahoo.com/search... mr bush we dont have to prove you did 911 anymore to hang you til death like the law calls 4 for treason during war, all your secrecy and war against the bill of rights is all we need
Forum posts
7 March 2006, 10:09
"... except for claims for violations of the Constitution or of federal statutes ..." But that is exactly what is the case here. Not only is he breaking the Constition, Bill of Rights and international laws and agreements (e.g., the Geneva Conventions, which by federal law are overriding) to which the USA is a signatory, but he is doing so in full knowledge of his actions. These people should be suing him for every penny that he has ever or will ever "earn" (the inverted commas are because I somehow doubt that he has actually earned it).
9 March 2006, 01:33
I know, I have never seen so many people that dont seem to care anymore, it must be something they spray or something, one day every one is all fired up ready to get these criminals and then its like they put a spell on or something, maybe bette midler was onto sumthin.I would leave but someone must resist. an urgent call is needed to mobilize now , before they have everything in place and we American people become another chapter in a history book . Take back DC now.