9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world

9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
By Nico Haupt
April 1, 2006

9/11 was April Fool’s Day.

As already proven here, it was a helicopter of either military or "journalistic" nature, equipped with a high-tech military camera system ("WESCAM"),
which provided us on Sep11th, 2001 with the only ’live’ available footage (*plus 4-7 sec. technical delay) of the second hit.
The helicopter was already pre-positioned, and allegedly filmed a commercial aircraft.

The original footage, unedited, was never provided to the public.
The name of the cameraman is unknown.

The hipothesis is, that the high tech multimedia system from WESCAM, filmed an empty landscape, and was upgraded in real time, with a pre-produced, vector-keyed CGI (Computer generated Imagery),
then broadcasted into the feed of W-ABC, as also synched in time to CNN, FOX and other channels.

The question is therefore, why did they fake it?

The answer is oppressed from alleged 9/11 activists, linked to the brainwash machinery of 911truth.org, associated projects and partners, but also related fake oppositions.

Are we naive enough to believe, that this high tech military camera system,
known as WESCAM, was not able to provide us with much better video quality?

As military contractor WESCAM Inc. (now L-3) revealed during 2001 (and since then improved), their quality and equipment was able to work with a "magnification 4-step zoom"!!

WESCAM did also do a much better job with their special effect for the ’hijack/remote control meme’ of the ’Lone Gunman’-tv version of 9/11.
This episode, supported by WESCAM operator Mark Hryma predicted the official "plotline"-version of 9/11 to confuse the forthcoming findings of the TV fakery for the "military operation" of 9/11.
This was an episode, which shows a much better commercial aircraft,
which is ’almost’ hitting the Twin Towers on March 4, 2001.
The camera system was provided by WESCAM Inc.

WESCAM did the same professional job for Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 (2000), The Truman Show (1998) or Star Trek (1996).

Why not on Sep11th?
Where was the quality? Where was the real gig?

Are we willing to believe, that a pre-positioned camera in a pre-positioned chopper was not able to zoom into the object and receive the same high tech details?

Again, what was the name of the camera operator and who was the pilot?

A professional WESCAM quality should indeed look like this:

– link-

(Pre-Sep11th picture of N612UA, also known as "UA175",
officially hitting the South Tower on 9/11)

Instead the "WESCAMmers" presented us this:

– link-

Following this media scam, 15 other CGIs (computer generated imagery), pre-produced by different "VR-terror drill teams", then uploaded by unknown high-tech perps, then forwarded to pre-selected TV channels.
(Obsessed with military number codes, the military ’9/11 media perps’ had possibly produced "19" CGIs, but then trashcanned their worst products, or put some on hold for later.
However the majority of all known ’CGI scams’ had not even been presented anyway in the first two hours after the second ’hit’ (8:45 AM -10:45 AM).

Many clips never arrived on the day of Sep11th at all, instead in the following weeks overpromoted on the internet....

More here:
9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html